Yale Edeiken Disciplined by The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of The State

[Doktor Tavische]

On 29 Oct 2003 20:00:36 GMT, <[email protected]> Doktor
Tavische <[email protected]> wrote:

http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured) Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney InquiryAttorney ID Case County District40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98 ^^^^^^^^^<STOP>

New addition: A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attop...p?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPost...22DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)

You've really been quite a little ******* or should I say a real fat *******!!

Everyone read the above!! It will shock you all! If enough people will get on
the stick and report Shyster Edeiken to the Disciplinary Board with full
documentation then that criminal ******* will for sure lose his license to
practice law! He is unfit to practice law and no one should ever forget how that
******* abused the legal system for personal vendettas against many of us! Now
is the time to have justice served!

Here is the address:

From: Xxxxx Xxxxx <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Information Request On How to Report a Lawyer's Abuse of
The Legal System

You can contact the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court at
Two Lemoyne Dr., 2nd Floor
Lemoyne Pa 17043
(717) 731-7073 atty registration
(717) 731-7083 complaints

http://www.pabar.org/
Pennsylvania State Bar Association
100 South Street
P.O. Box 186
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0186
1.717.238.6715 Phone
1.717.238.1204 Fax

David Michael should also let the Disciplinary Board know about 1999-C-3048 and
how Edeiken threatened to give him the same treatment he was giving "Brad****."

We owe it to the legal community and to justice that Yale F. Edeiken lose his
ability to practice law. Let that ******* get bottles and cans from ditches like
he has threatened others. His wife has already lost her Shaklee account and most
likely because of the consumer fraud complaints filed. Now is the time to give
the slob the old one two!

BTW Yale if you don't like my efforts to have justice served then sue me again
you waddling fat ******* BUT do so in my county and see what happens to you!

Tavish

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&s...4ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: David Michael Came Very Close to Getting The "TREATMENT" Shyster Yale
F. Edeiken Gave Me! aka Re: Bradbury Misses The Point (Again)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 24 May 2003 07:09:57 GMT



__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Eb Dawson]

Scott Bradbury does not engage in personal attack.

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 13:30:49 -0700,
<[email protected]> Sara Salzman
<[email protected]> wrote:

Subject: Scott Bradbury does not engage in personal attack.

I don't and the one sided out of context quotes you keep parroting aren't
proofs! You are dishonest when you refuse to also post what I responded to!

Even Jesus when he had enough verbal abuse form your evil forefathers would call
them serpents and vipers and he also told them they were the Children of the
Devil which you are Sara!

Tavish

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe....com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Jesus Christ & Deceased Christians- Their Condition According to TALMUD
(Boiling Semen & Excrement) S_0127
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 28 Jan 2004 05:36:04 GMT

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Ken Lewis]

Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why! aka PING David Michael

On 2 Feb 2004 14:58:40 GMT, Eb Dawson <[email protected]>
wrote:

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 22:28:20 GMT, <[email protected]>Gord McFee <[email protected]> wrote:
On 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT, Eb Dawson wrote:
I forged nothing!!!!
INTRODUCTION
"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of myposts prove so! You can't discern the difference."
Very true!! My posts are replied to with continual verbal abuse and then I willoccasionally answer the filth in a manner they deserve BUT the bulk of my postsare not name calling and personal attacks. I stand by what I state too!

LOL. If it weren't for your slander, name-calling, and personal
attacks you'd never have anything to post, Lardass.

[Patrick Keenan]

Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why! aka PING David Michael

"Eb Dawson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 22:28:20 GMT,

<[email protected]>

Gord McFee <[email protected]> wrote:

On 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT, Eb Dawson wrote:

I forged nothing!!!!

INTRODUCTION"I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of

my

posts prove so! You can't discern the difference." Very true!! My posts are replied to with continual verbal abuse and then I

will

occasionally answer the filth in a manner they deserve BUT the bulk of my

posts

are not name calling and personal attacks. I stand by what I state

too!<snip>

Unless, of course, you're asked to stand by your statement of offer of a
"$10,000 Challenge". Then, you won't verify that you have sufficient funds
to make such an offer, and indeed, you'll deny making the offer (in the same
post as you offer it).

You stand by your statements to the point where you won't even acknowledge
that your "challenge" *has been accepted*.

So, how about it? Yes or no. Do you have the money to back up your
"$10,000 Challenge"?

-pk