Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Income taxes are needed?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Income taxes are needed?

    > StaR) Jimmy, the rights entitled and duties imposed upon "persons" are
    completely mandated by the corporate body and are ruled and regulated by the roman municipal law of the land as so adopted. PERIOD. As a matter of FACT, the rights entitled by a PERSON are completely DEPENDENT on a RANK held within the BODY CORPORATE. To suggest that the rights of "persons" come from God is an indication of a criminally insane SOB.
    Q) If that is the case and the application of the protections of the
    Bill of Rights is solely dependent upon the status persons hold as a
    result their place in the U.S. corporation, you will need to explain
    how it is that individuals who have no status at all in this so called
    corporation are also protected by the Bill of Rights.

    Specifically you will need to explain how the due process protections
    of the Bill of Rights can be afforded foreigners in the U.S.

    How can your theory hold water in light of the fact that should you
    ride your bike over the bridge at Detroit and commit a crime you will
    enjoy the same due process rights as an American?

  • #2
    Income taxes are needed?

    [email protected] (Quantrell) wrote in message news:<[email protected] om>...
    StaR) Jimmy, the rights entitled and duties imposed upon "persons" are completely mandated by the corporate body and are ruled and regulated by the roman municipal law of the land as so adopted. PERIOD. As a matter of FACT, the rights entitled by a PERSON are completely DEPENDENT on a RANK held within the BODY CORPORATE. To suggest that the rights of "persons" come from God is an indication of a criminally insane SOB. Q) If that is the case and the application of the protections of the Bill of Rights is solely dependent upon the status persons hold as a result their place in the U.S. corporation, you will need to explain how it is that individuals who have no status at all in this so called corporation are also protected by the Bill of Rights. Specifically you will need to explain how the due process protections of the Bill of Rights can be afforded foreigners in the U.S. How can your theory hold water in light of the fact that should you ride your bike over the bridge at Detroit and commit a crime you will enjoy the same due process rights as an American?
    Q 2) Are you stumped again, StaR?

    Again, according to your theory how can it be that you, with no rank
    or membership at all in the so called U.S. corporation, could enjoy
    the the due process protections of the Bill of Rights?

    Your silence reminds the reader of your inability to explain how
    sovereign nations had authority over those living in it borders in a
    time before drivers licenses, birth certificates or any of the other
    things you say trick us into citizenship.

    Comment


    • #3
      Income taxes are needed?

      On 15 Sep 2003 02:58:17 -0700, [email protected] (Quantrell)
      wrote:
      [email protected] (Quantrell) wrote in message news:<[email protected] om>...
      StaR) Jimmy, the rights entitled and duties imposed upon "persons" are completely mandated by the corporate body and are ruled and regulated by the roman municipal law of the land as so adopted. PERIOD. As a matter of FACT, the rights entitled by a PERSON are completely DEPENDENT on a RANK held within the BODY CORPORATE. To suggest that the rights of "persons" come from God is an indication of a criminally insane SOB. Q) If that is the case and the application of the protections of the Bill of Rights is solely dependent upon the status persons hold as a result their place in the U.S. corporation, you will need to explain how it is that individuals who have no status at all in this so called corporation are also protected by the Bill of Rights. Specifically you will need to explain how the due process protections of the Bill of Rights can be afforded foreigners in the U.S. How can your theory hold water in light of the fact that should you ride your bike over the bridge at Detroit and commit a crime you will enjoy the same due process rights as an American?
      Q 2) Are you stumped again, StaR?Again, according to your theory how can it be that you, with no rankor membership at all in the so called U.S. corporation, could enjoythe the due process protections of the Bill of Rights?
      Hahaha my how desperate one can get. No rank or membership? WRONG
      again simpleton. The CORPORATION determines that in such a case, the
      word person will be applied to the man to establish the rank of ALIEN
      on the presumptive evidence of a temporary local allegiance. In other
      words, it is a TRESPASS on the man's UNALIENABLE RIGHT to CONSENT to
      be governed by such an ORGANIZATION. Having said that however, if he
      commits a CRIME in that he trespasses on another man's UNALIENABLE
      RIGHTS, he is answerable to his crime whether in or out of that
      "society".
      Your silence reminds the reader of your inability to explain howsovereign nations had authority over those living in it borders in atime before drivers licenses, birth certificates or any of the otherthings you say trick us into citizenship.
      If a man gives evidence of PERSON in any way shape or form, he is
      bound to the laws of PERSONS. Driver licenses, birth certificates,
      voter registration, or any OTHER UNDERstanding to the rights entitled
      or duties imposed to a PERSON fall into the jurisdiction of its laws.
      However, NO PERSON = NO JURISDICTION = NO CASE and a man remains
      intact with his UNALIENABLE RIGHTS. Any further actions against him is
      a criminal act by a criminal organization if he DOES NOT CONSENT to be
      GOVERNED by said organization.

      StaR.


      Comment


      • #4
        Income taxes are needed?

        On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:41:30 GMT, StaR <[email protected]> wrote:
        On 15 Sep 2003 02:58:17 -0700, [email protected] (Quantrell)wrote:
        [email protected] (Quantrell) wrote in message news:<[email protected] om>...
        > StaR) Jimmy, the rights entitled and duties imposed upon "persons" are > completely mandated by the corporate body and are ruled and regulated > by the roman municipal law of the land as so adopted. PERIOD. As a > matter of FACT, the rights entitled by a PERSON are completely > DEPENDENT on a RANK held within the BODY CORPORATE. To suggest that > the rights of "persons" come from God is an indication of a criminally > insane SOB. Q) If that is the case and the application of the protections of the Bill of Rights is solely dependent upon the status persons hold as a result their place in the U.S. corporation, you will need to explain how it is that individuals who have no status at all in this so called corporation are also protected by the Bill of Rights. Specifically you will need to explain how the due process protections of the Bill of Rights can be afforded foreigners in the U.S. How can your theory hold water in light of the fact that should you ride your bike over the bridge at Detroit and commit a crime you will enjoy the same due process rights as an American?
        Q 2) Are you stumped again, StaR?Again, according to your theory how can it be that you, with no rankor membership at all in the so called U.S. corporation, could enjoythe the due process protections of the Bill of Rights?
        Hahaha my how desperate one can get. No rank or membership? WRONGagain simpleton. The CORPORATION determines that in such a case, theword person will be applied to the man to establish the rank of ALIENon the presumptive evidence of a temporary local allegiance. In otherwords, it is a TRESPASS on the man's UNALIENABLE RIGHT to CONSENT tobe governed by such an ORGANIZATION. Having said that however, if hecommits a CRIME in that he trespasses on another man's UNALIENABLERIGHTS, he is answerable to his crime whether in or out of that"society".
        Your silence reminds the reader of your inability to explain howsovereign nations had authority over those living in it borders in atime before drivers licenses, birth certificates or any of the otherthings you say trick us into citizenship.
        If a man gives evidence of PERSON in any way shape or form, he isbound to the laws of PERSONS. Driver licenses, birth certificates,voter registration, or any OTHER UNDERstanding to the rights entitledor duties imposed to a PERSON fall into the jurisdiction of its laws.However, NO PERSON = NO JURISDICTION = NO CASE and a man remainsintact with his UNALIENABLE RIGHTS. Any further actions against him isa criminal act by a criminal organization if he DOES NOT CONSENT to beGOVERNED by said organization.StaR.
        Now that I've answered your question, answer me this.... What was the
        basis of law behind the "Declaration of Independence"???

        StaR

        Comment

        The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation.
        Working...
        X