Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nothing like the Paul Thomas hissy fit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Thomas the sot



    You must be a wet brain to lie so much, Thomas.
    ----------------------------------------------
    " Income within the meaning of IRC 61a carries
    with it a general requirement of 'realization' ''.
    (Helvering v. Horst, 311 US 112,115-16)

    ak


    Comment


    • #17
      Thomas the sot



      You must be a wet brain to lie so much, Thomas.
      ----------------------------------------------
      " Income within the meaning of IRC 61a carries
      with it a general requirement of 'realization' ''.
      (Helvering v. Horst, 311 US 112,115-16)

      ak


      Comment


      • #18
        Andy, the perpetual liar


        "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
        You must be a wet brain to lie so much,

        These are your words Andy:

        On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:03:32 GMT
        "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
        Don't forget the importance of the 2nd Amendment in generating governmental restraint. I don't believe everyone should have a right to an AK-47 or a rocket launcher, but one good 12-gauge will keep most government operatives thinking about how really necessary it is when resorting to knocking down doors or grabbing assets without due diligence

        Not the lies you told about me:

        On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:33:08 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
        "The most ludicrous interpretation of this is that for "the security of a
        free State" someone must belong to a government organization in order to
        "keep and bear Arms." Of course, that's what the JERK thinks."


        On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:02:31 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
        "No Paul - it was based on what you posted some time ago. But you probably
        can't remember it. But that's OK. We understand."


        On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:06:01 GMT "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
        "Thomas - and you did make a post suggesting that
        to keep personal fire arms in the home, one needed
        to be part of the National Guard."


        Give it up Andy, you lied. You know it. I know it. And nothing you can do
        will prove otherwise. Ya know why? Because you lied.


        --
        "For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not,
        none will suffice." - Joseph Dunniger

        Paul A. Thomas, CPA
        Athens, Georgia
        taxman at negia.net


        Comment


        • #19
          Andy, the perpetual liar


          "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
          You must be a wet brain to lie so much,

          These are your words Andy:

          On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:03:32 GMT
          "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
          Don't forget the importance of the 2nd Amendment in generating governmental restraint. I don't believe everyone should have a right to an AK-47 or a rocket launcher, but one good 12-gauge will keep most government operatives thinking about how really necessary it is when resorting to knocking down doors or grabbing assets without due diligence

          Not the lies you told about me:

          On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:33:08 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
          "The most ludicrous interpretation of this is that for "the security of a
          free State" someone must belong to a government organization in order to
          "keep and bear Arms." Of course, that's what the JERK thinks."


          On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:02:31 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
          "No Paul - it was based on what you posted some time ago. But you probably
          can't remember it. But that's OK. We understand."


          On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:06:01 GMT "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
          "Thomas - and you did make a post suggesting that
          to keep personal fire arms in the home, one needed
          to be part of the National Guard."


          Give it up Andy, you lied. You know it. I know it. And nothing you can do
          will prove otherwise. Ya know why? Because you lied.


          --
          "For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not,
          none will suffice." - Joseph Dunniger

          Paul A. Thomas, CPA
          Athens, Georgia
          taxman at negia.net


          Comment

          The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation.
          Working...
          X