Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements


No announcement yet.


  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts


    Andy, aglow with stupidity and hatred posted:

    On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:33:08 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
    "The most ludicrous interpretation of this is that for "the security of a
    free State" someone must belong to a government organization in order to
    "keep and bear Arms." Of course, that's what the JERK thinks."

    On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:02:31 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
    "No Paul - it was based on what you posted some time ago. But you probably
    can't remember it. But that's OK. We understand."

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:06:01 GMT "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
    "Thomas - and you did make a post suggesting that
    to keep personal fire arms in the home, one needed
    to be part of the National Guard."

    Yet, in three and a half months he has yet to prove one word of it.

    And oh yes, he is angry, nay, mad as hell, that I won't let this pass from

    How does Andy justify his lies?

    "Just because I can't "prove" it, doesn't mean that it never happened"
    Andrew Kilpatrick Sun, 10 Apr 2005

    Fortunately Andy, when something can be proven, it means it did happen.

    "For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not,
    none will suffice." - Joseph Dunniger

    Paul A. Thomas, CPA
    Athens, Georgia
    taxman at

  • #2
    &quot;Goo goo&quot; Paul

    Paul - little baby Paul - there are numerous tax professionals and even some
    of the protester bunch (whom I don't agree with, but don't see them as
    automatically deserving the abuse you and a few of your fellow jerks toss
    out at them on a regular basis) that I respect and have no problem with -
    even if I don't buy everything they say. But they are not out there
    constantly asserting themselves - whether they know something about the
    subject or not. The real professionals comment when they have something to
    say that usually is based on knowledge or experience. But Thomas always has
    something to say, whether it's a biased opinion or just a cross and vulgar
    remark. Have you EVER tried keeping your mouth and your computer quiet when
    you had nothing useful to say, Thomas? Apparently not, based on your too
    many posts! You don't own this newsgroup, Thomas. And you are a very small
    minded JERK. Why don't you stop making a public fool of yourself?

    " Income within the meaning of IRC 61a carries
    with it a general requirement of 'realization' ''.
    (Helvering v. Horst, 311 US 112,115-16)



    • #3
      Andy continues to avoid the truth

      All you have to do Andy, is prove you told the truth.

      Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.
      Paul A. Thomas, CPA
      Athens, Georgia
      taxman at


      The forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation.