Andy, these are YOUR posts, yet you are scared to address them in an ethical
and moral manner.

You'd rather divert the topic away from your lies and threats.

Lies from Andy:

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:33:08 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
"The most ludicrous interpretation of this is that for "the security of a
free State" someone must belong to a government organization in order to
"keep and bear Arms." Of course, that's what the JERK thinks."

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:02:31 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
"No Paul - it was based on what you posted some time ago. But you probably
can't remember it. But that's OK. We understand."

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:06:01 GMT "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
"Thomas - and you did make a post suggesting that
to keep personal fire arms in the home, one needed
to be part of the National Guard."

Threats from Andy:

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:03:32 GMT "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
Don't forget the importance of the 2nd Amendment in generating governmental restraint. I don't believe everyone should have a right to an AK-47 or a rocket launcher, but one good 12-gauge will keep most government operatives thinking about how really necessary it is when resorting to knocking down doors or grabbing assets without due diligence

You mentioned "governmental restraint" and "government operatives" for a
reason. You mentioned "criminal" as an afterthought. You never
mentioned your home.

It's obvious where your priorities are.


--
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992), Salvor Hardin in "Foundation"

Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia
taxman at negia.net