Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pitiful Paul Thomas

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Paul Thomas - what a guy!!!


    "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
    Maybe you have in mind throwing your Second Amendment rights at them (it won't hurt much, as it's just one small line) when they come in to audit you, or maybe you'll mention your Second Amendment rights when your bank acount is levied, but that isn't what you meant. "and that the 2nd Amendment was written to assure that government power never circumvented due process" Really? Do you know what the Second Amendment says Andy? There isn't anything in there about "protection from extreme IRS abuse" or to "assure that government power never circumvented due process". Nope. That is something you made up. Another fabrication. Another of your lies You must be the one who makes all those "interpretations" of IRC for IRS, Paul Thomas - jerk CPA. You lie, and then claim others said what you made up. You are a real sicko Thomas. ak "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." (Richard Henry Lee, Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights.)

    I see nothing in that statement that allows you the right to shoot an IRS
    employee who is doing their job in a manner you don't agree with.


    "The great object is that every man be armed . . . Everyone who is able may have a gun." (Patrick Henry, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution.)


    I see nothing in that statement that allows you the right to shoot an IRS
    employee who is doing their job in a manner you don't agree with.

    "The advantage of being armed . . . the Americans possess over the people of all other nations . . . Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several Kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." (James Madison, author of the Bill of Rights, in his Federalist Paper No. 46.) http://www.constitution.org/mil/rkba1982.htm
    I see nothing in that statement that allows you the right to shoot an IRS
    employee who is doing their job in a manner you don't agree with.


    And isn't that what you said you wanted to do with the Second Amendment?
    Shoot IRS employees.

    "me for mentioning the 2nd amendment as the last resort protection from
    extreme IRS abuse"

    Yes. It is obvious that you have intentions not parallel with the framers
    of the Constitution. Their intent was not for Andy to shoot IRS employees
    because Andy doesn't like the manner in which they are performing their job.

    It's obvious now why you were never drafted in the military. Mental
    disabilities.



    --
    "Under certain circumstances profanity provides a relief denied by prayer"
    Mark Twain
    ---------------------------------------------
    Paul A. Thomas, CPA
    Athens, Georgia
    taxman at negia dot net




    Comment


    • #17
      Paul Thoms - hung one on last night


      Who is this "Paul Thoms" guy anyway?

      What? You say "typo"? Maybe the person who typed that list of contributors
      to "Doug McMillan" made a typo.

      That's it you see. You live a "typo" life.



      --
      If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?
      ----------------
      Paul A. Thomas, CPA
      Athens, Georgia


      Comment


      • #18
        Paul Thomas - what a JERK! Is he/it really a CPA? Only in Georgia!


        "Paul A Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
        news:[email protected]
        "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
        Maybe you have in mind throwing your Second Amendment rights at them
        (it
        won't hurt much, as it's just one small line) when they come in to
        audit
        you, or maybe you'll mention your Second Amendment rights when your
        bank
        acount is levied, but that isn't what you meant. "and that the 2nd Amendment was written to assure that government
        power
        never circumvented due process" Really? Do you know what the Second Amendment says Andy? There isn't anything in there about "protection from extreme IRS abuse" or to
        "assure
        that government power never circumvented due process". Nope. That is something you made up. Another fabrication. Another of your lies You must be the one who makes all those "interpretations" of IRC for
        IRS,
        Paul Thomas - jerk CPA. You lie, and then claim others said what you
        made
        up. You are a real sicko Thomas. ak "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." (Richard Henry Lee, Virginia delegate to the Continental
        Congress,
        initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights.) I see nothing in that statement that allows you the right to shoot an IRS employee who is doing their job in a manner you don't agree with.
        Neither do I, you JERK!

        ak


        Comment


        • #19
          Paul Thoms - hung one on last night


          "Paul A Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:[email protected]
          Who is this "Paul Thoms" guy anyway?
          He/it is a real dumb JERK. ak


          Comment


          • #20
            Paul Thomas - what a great guy


            "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
            I see nothing in that statement that allows you the right to shoot an IRS employee who is doing their job in a manner you don't agree with. Neither do I, you JERK!

            But Andy, you said that you believe the Second Amendment is......oh, what
            were those infamous words.........yes, "as the last resort protection from
            extreme IRS abuse". Just how did you intend to use the Second Amendment
            from IRS "abuses" (extreme or otherwise), except to shoot someone who is
            just doing their job in a manner in which you don't agree with?

            Because from your posts, you don't like many of the policies and procedures
            the IRS has, nor do you believe in the law as Congress has written it. It's
            clear from your posts that you are the arbitrator as to what an "abuse" is,
            and what is not. Clearly, from your posts, making pension contributions in
            excess of the legal limits isn't an abuse, but attempts to rectify the
            excess amount is an "abuse", at least according to the historical posts.




            --
            Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
            Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992), Salvor Hardin in "Foundation"

            Paul A. Thomas, CPA
            Athens, Georgia
            taxman at negia.net



            Comment


            • #21
              Paul Thoms - hung one on last night


              "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
              "Paul A Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote
              Who is this "Paul Thoms" guy anyway? He/it is a real dumb JERK. ak

              Yeah, not nearly as smart as the guy who types for you, ehe?


              Maybe he's the guy who contributed to Doug McMillan's campaign fund. Maybe
              he's the guy who claims that the Second Amendment is limited to those in the
              National Guard. Maybe he's that guy who made all those late night (or was
              it early morning) calls to your house.



              --
              "For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not,
              none will suffice." - Joseph Dunniger

              Paul A. Thomas, CPA
              Athens, Georgia
              taxman at negia.net


              Comment


              • #22
                Paul Thomas - what a great guy


                "Paul A Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
                news:[email protected]
                "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
                I see nothing in that statement that allows you the right to shoot an
                IRS
                employee who is doing their job in a manner you don't agree with. Neither do I, you JERK! But Andy, you said that you believe the Second Amendment is......oh, what were those infamous words.........yes, "as the last resort protection from extreme IRS abuse". Just how did you intend to use the Second Amendment from IRS "abuses" (extreme or otherwise), except to shoot someone who is just doing their job in a manner in which you don't agree with?
                Speak for yourself, JERK.

                Because from your posts, you don't like many of the policies and
                procedures
                the IRS has, nor do you believe in the law as Congress has written it.
                Again - the JERK of all jerks, making up his own interpretations as if they
                are fact. What a creep you are, Thomas! Indeed, IRS does a lousy job of
                implementing the complex and sometimes contradictory laws of Congress. And
                indeed, sometimes the courts decided that -despite all the attorneys and
                those who couldn't pass the bar exam but graduated with law degrees that
                infest our Congress - the tax laws Congress comes up with are not legal,
                even though they are attempting to write law. None of which allows IRS to
                operate without due process or with violence when no violence has been
                threatened our used against them. Of course a jerk like you, Thomas, would
                "interpret" whatever they wanted into justifying criminal assaults by IRS -
                now wouldn't you? Sure, and you would believe your own lies. And it's jerks
                like you that should be kept as far away as possible from IRS and our
                government in general, if IRS is ever going to improve its image and its
                conduct. (The spending of huge sums for PR blitzes is NOT what IRS should be
                doing to attempt to improve their image; we need real changes in their
                approach - and true outside oversight to help IRS see the way.) One of the
                big problems is that there is not enough down-side for IRS when they ignore
                due process and responsible conduct. That needs changing.
                It's clear from your posts that you are the arbitrator as to what an "abuse"
                is,
                and what is not. Clearly, from your posts, making pension contributions
                in
                excess of the legal limits isn't an abuse, but attempts to rectify the excess amount is an "abuse", at least according to the historical posts.
                You wouldn't recognize what "clear" is if it bit you, Jerk Paul Thomas!

                Really Thomas - GET SOME HELP!

                ak


                Comment


                • #23
                  Paul Thomas - what a great guy


                  "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
                  Speak for yourself, JERK.
                  Why should I bother doing that, when you do such a fine job making up words
                  that you claim are mine?

                  Like these:
                  On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:33:08 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
                  "The most ludicrous interpretation of this is that for "the security of a
                  free State" someone must belong to a government organization in order to
                  "keep and bear Arms." Of course, that's what the JERK thinks."

                  On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:02:31 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
                  "No Paul - it was based on what you posted some time ago. But you probably
                  can't remember it. But that's OK. We understand."

                  On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:06:01 GMT "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
                  "Thomas - and you did make a post suggesting that
                  to keep personal fire arms in the home, one needed
                  to be part of the National Guard."

                  the tax laws Congress comes up with are not legal,
                  Careful now Andy, the "tax laws.....are not legal"? You are dangerously
                  close to being on the IRS list of tax wacks (if you don't already top it).


                  None of which allows IRS to operate without due process or with violence when no violence has been threatened our used against them.
                  So, you just threatened violence against them, which under Andyism means
                  they can use violence against you?


                  One of the big problems is that there is not enough down-side for IRS when they ignore due process and responsible conduct. That needs changing.

                  Indeed. Whooping out your Second Amendment right as "protection", that'll
                  change 'em.


                  Really Thomas - GET SOME HELP!

                  Indeed. You can help by proving your statements to be true.

                  On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:33:08 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
                  "The most ludicrous interpretation of this is that for "the security of a
                  free State" someone must belong to a government organization in order to
                  "keep and bear Arms." Of course, that's what the JERK thinks."

                  On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:02:31 GMT - "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
                  "No Paul - it was based on what you posted some time ago. But you probably
                  can't remember it. But that's OK. We understand."

                  On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:06:01 GMT "AK" <[email protected]> wrote
                  "Thomas - and you did make a post suggesting that
                  to keep personal fire arms in the home, one needed
                  to be part of the National Guard."


                  Otherwise, really, who can believe anything you post?



                  --
                  Paul A. Thomas, CPA
                  Athens, Georgia




                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Pitiful Andy, pitiful Mrs Kilpatrick.


                    Why?



                    --
                    Paul A. Thomas, CPA
                    Athens, Georgia


                    Comment

                    The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation.
                    Working...
                    X