Tweet
On 9 Oct 2003 15:01:39 GMT, [email protected] (Andre Lieven) wrote:
->20/03/00
->Why Should a Man Bear Responsibility for a Woman who Decides to
->have a Baby?
->
->http://www.angryharry.com/esWhyShoul...onsibility.htm
->
->It never seems to dawn on this feminist-indoctrinated society
->that such women have total responsibility for having children.
That's true.
->
->No-one can make them have them.
->
Also true. It's alswya a choice.
->No wonder, therefore, that the numbers of single-mother families
->continue to grow together with their armies of dysfunctional
->progeny.
->
See below.
->Here's how the political editor of the Spectator, Bruce Anderson,
->started his response to the issue. "The fact that this boy got
->this seventeen year old pregnant ..."
->
->Do you see? It's embedded in the language.
It's also true that the Popmedia is ****ed bad.
http://cato.org/testimony/ct-wc67.html
....[welfare causes crime snipped...]
At the same time, the evidence of a link between the availability
of welfare and out-of-wedlock births is overwhelming. There have
been 13 major studies of the relationship between the availability
of welfare benefits and out-of-wedlock birth. Of these, 11 found
a statistically significant correlation. Among the best of these
studies is the work done by June O'Neill for the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services. Holding constant a wide range of
variables, including income, education, and urban vs. suburban
setting, the study found that a 50 percent increase in the value
of AFDC and foodstamp payments led to a 43 percent increase in
the number of out-of-wedlock births.(7) Likewise, research by
Shelley Lundberg and Robert Plotnick of the University of
Washington showed that an increase in welfare benefits of $200
per month per family increased the rate of out-of-wedlock births
among teenagers by 150 percent.(8)
....
->20/03/00
->Why Should a Man Bear Responsibility for a Woman who Decides to
->have a Baby?
->
->http://www.angryharry.com/esWhyShoul...onsibility.htm
->
->It never seems to dawn on this feminist-indoctrinated society
->that such women have total responsibility for having children.
That's true.
->
->No-one can make them have them.
->
Also true. It's alswya a choice.
->No wonder, therefore, that the numbers of single-mother families
->continue to grow together with their armies of dysfunctional
->progeny.
->
See below.
->Here's how the political editor of the Spectator, Bruce Anderson,
->started his response to the issue. "The fact that this boy got
->this seventeen year old pregnant ..."
->
->Do you see? It's embedded in the language.
It's also true that the Popmedia is ****ed bad.
http://cato.org/testimony/ct-wc67.html
....[welfare causes crime snipped...]
At the same time, the evidence of a link between the availability
of welfare and out-of-wedlock births is overwhelming. There have
been 13 major studies of the relationship between the availability
of welfare benefits and out-of-wedlock birth. Of these, 11 found
a statistically significant correlation. Among the best of these
studies is the work done by June O'Neill for the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services. Holding constant a wide range of
variables, including income, education, and urban vs. suburban
setting, the study found that a 50 percent increase in the value
of AFDC and foodstamp payments led to a 43 percent increase in
the number of out-of-wedlock births.(7) Likewise, research by
Shelley Lundberg and Robert Plotnick of the University of
Washington showed that an increase in welfare benefits of $200
per month per family increased the rate of out-of-wedlock births
among teenagers by 150 percent.(8)
....