Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements


No announcement yet.

A 52% Mandate? You Tell Me

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A 52% Mandate? You Tell Me

    I knew this would happen, but it still makes me sick......... Why is anyone
    surprised? The "flat earthers" , Bushes biggest fan club, still don't believe
    in global warming, or evolution.

    Bush sets out plan to dismantle 30 years of environmental laws
    By Geoffrey Lean in Washington
    05 December 2004

    George Bush's new administration, and its supporters controlling Congress, are
    setting out to dismantle three decades of US environmental protection.

    In little over a month since his re-election, they have announced that they
    will comprehensively rewrite three of the country's most important
    environmental laws, open up vast new areas for oil and gas drilling, and
    reshape the official Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    They say that the election gave them a mandate for the measures - which,
    ironically, will overturn a legislative system originally established by the
    Republican Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford - even though Mr Bush went
    out of his way to avoid emphasising his environmental plans during his

    "The election was a validation of the philosophy and the agenda," said Mike
    Leavitt, the Bush-appointed head of the EPA. He points out that over a third of
    the agency's staff will become eligible for retirement over the President's
    four-year term, enabling him to fill it with people lenient to polluters.

    The administration's first priority is the controversial plan to open up the
    Arctic Wildlife Refuge for oil drilling. Two years ago the Senate defeated
    plans to exploit the refuge - home to caribou, polar bears , musk oxen and
    millions of migratory birds - by 52 votes to 48.

    But with the election of four Republican senators in favour of the drilling,
    and the disappearance of one who opposed it, the administration now has the
    votes forvictory.

    It plans to follow with an energy bill - also defeated in the last Congress -
    which would investigate vast new tracts for exploitation for oil and gas. It
    will also encourage the building of nuclear power stations, halted since the
    1979 Three Mile Island accident.

    Far more radical measures are also under way. Joe Barton, the Texas Republican
    chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who is to help push
    through the energy bill, has also announced a comprehensive review of the Clean
    Air Act, one of the world's most successful environmental laws.

    Environmentalists predict the emasculation of the Act, which has cut air
    pollution across the country by more than half over the last 30 years. Not to
    be outdone, the Republican chairman of the House Resources Committee, Richard
    Pombo, has announced a review of the Endangered Species Act, for the protection
    of wildlife. The law has been the main obstacle to the felling of much of the
    US's remaining endangered rain forest. And in a third assault, Congressional
    leaders have also announced an attack on the National Environmental Policy Act,
    which requires details of the environmental effects of major developments
    before they proceed.

    Philip Clapp, president of the National Environmental Trust, said last week
    that the previous Bush administration had largely contented itself with
    weakening environmental legislation, but the new one intended to go much
    further. He added: "We will now see an assault on the law which will set the US
    in the direction of becoming a Third World country in terms of environmental

    The environmentalists point out that almost every local referendum on
    environmental issues carried out on election day achieved a green majority.

    They recall the fate of the assault on environmental law - headed by the former
    Congressional Speaker, Newt Gingrich, in the mid 1990s - which caused such
    opposition that Congress enacted tough new green legislation.

The forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation.