Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Claim paid, but not through w/c carrier Arkansas

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ElleMD
    replied
    Ditto. Sounds like a WC. It needs to be reported to the carrier. For one, there is a better than average chance the medical carrier will reject the claim down the line as it was the result of an injury that should be covered by another policy. Happens constantly.

    This shouldn't be a hassle. It is a straightforward claim as you described it and shouldn't cause any problems with the WC carrier.

    Not what you asked but the other reason the CEO needs to report it is that whole example setting bit. If he demonstrates he is beyond the rules and there is no need to follow the proper channels, good luck getting the rank and file to comply. Those at the rally see that the "proper" thing to do is to just run it through the medical carrier and get the company to pay any difference. I hope I don't have to tell you how that has the potential to implode. Unringing that bell is a royal pain.

    Leave a comment:


  • CAIW
    replied
    Get the medical reports, a statement from the CEO, and file a claim with your comp carrier.
    They will review, and make the determination of liability.
    If necessary, the GHP/Group Health Plan will be reimbursed, as well as your ER for their contribution of copay/deductibles.

    It was definately a bad decision.
    Contact your corp atty, or the comp atty for additional info.

    Leave a comment:


  • arkansasscribe
    replied
    We market the city in which we live. One of our campaigns involves the use of a hot air balloon that features our city logo and web address. While at a balloon rally (he is part of the team that operates the balloon), prepping the balloon for the competition, another team member let a part of the equipment fly loose and it whacked him in the face, knocking him down and nearly out. Blacked his eyes, and cut his face in several places. They went to the ER, but luckily nothing was broken. He then returned to the rally and continued in the competition.

    Trust me, the CEO is not shifty. He might have made a bad decision here, but I've worked for him for 15 years and highly respect him.

    Leave a comment:


  • CAIW
    replied
    There's no question that it would have been a legitimate w/c claim ...
    Whether or not this is a work injury would be determined by the treating physician medical evidence...not opinion of the CEO, CFO or you.

    If the CEO/IW did not want to file a claim because of difficulties, or in an attempt to keep the WC premiums from escalating... doesn't matter, but could be fraud against your WC carrier.

    Need more info here...on the injury itself as well as if your company is legally self insured.

    Sounds like this CEO is being a tad bit shifty...

    Leave a comment:


  • Morgana
    replied
    What are the circumstance of the injury? Just because he was out of work at a work function, does not mean that the injury is automatically covered by workers comp.

    Leave a comment:


  • cactus jack
    replied
    Proper channels are called proper channels for a reason. There is a process for everything. Including WC. If he wasn't at work when injured, how is it WC? I don't understand, and I bet the CFO and auditors won't either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Claim paid, but not through w/c carrier Arkansas

    My boss (CEO) was out of town at a work function and was injured. He used our group medical to pay for most of the claim. When he received the balance billing due, he told me to pay it since it was a workers comp injury in actuality. He basically didn't want to go through all the paperwork of w/c. I paid the remainder, but our CFO is not happy about it.

    There's no question that it would have been a legitimate w/c claim ... my question is this -- other than the auditors shaking their fingers at us, is there a legal reason why this should have been handled in proper channels? I want to be prepared if this should happen in the future. Thanks.
The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation.
Working...
X