In article <070720030948422060%[email protected]>, Tim May wrote:
In article <[email protected] >, Ignoramus9242 <[email protected]> wrote: ...
You need to get your story straight. In an early post you say the tree was destroyed, now you say "only a strip of bark was blown away."
In article <[email protected] >, [email protected]lid says...>The tree destroyed was a huge 200 year old oak.> No. The tree is intact, only a strip of bark was blown away.
not survivable. Now it appears that perhaps it is actually survivable.
i
Leave a comment: