was reading a bit on the legal groups and cam across many threads
regarding the legality of using a dictaphone to record a conversation
without the other persons consent.
In some places it is legal. In some it is not.
What I havent found is an explanation of the logic behind such laws.
To my limited legal knowledge it seems that the end result of these
laws is that they protect the liars and bullies of society, people who
would not want to repeat what they said in court. People who in court
would,given the chance, would lie and give a different version of what
they actually said.
Am i undertanding this wrongly?