Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Nebraska Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-18-2006, 10:50 AM
Marilyn Kruger Marilyn Kruger is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2
Default Wrongfull termination?

My husband was working for a state agency here in Nebraska. On the last day of the probationary period he was told that they were letting him go. He was given no reason, nor was he given any warming that this would happen. He was told that because he was still in the probationary period he could not file a grievance. Is it possible that this could be a case of age discrimination. There really seems to be no other explaination. Do we have any recourse?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-18-2006, 10:56 AM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

On the basis of what you have posted, no, this was not a wrongful termination. You have provided no reason whatsoever to assume that it is age discrimination.

They are not required to give him a reason; they may fire him for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason, as long as it is not a reason prohibited by law. Unless a specific law prohibits an employer from firing the employee for the reason they did, it is not a wrongful termination.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-18-2006, 11:10 AM
Marilyn Kruger Marilyn Kruger is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2
Default

Shouldn't you be given some indication that you might be let go? Is it appropreate to wait until the very last day? Or are you telling me that a person should expect that they might be terminated even if they feel that empolyer is satisfied with their preformance?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-18-2006, 11:13 AM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

I didn't say it was good managment. But bad management is not illegal.

The law does not require that he have been given prior warning that his job performance is unsatisfactory. I personally believe that it is good management to do so. But their failure to do so is not illegal and does not turn this into a wrongful term.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-18-2006, 11:15 AM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

BTW, on the age discrimination issue;

If they were planning to discriminate against him based on his age, it would have been easier and cheaper for them not to hire him in the first place. You still have provided no information explaining why you believe it is, but he will have a very hard time making such a claim since the company's defense will be that he was the same age when they hired him.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2008, 09:52 AM
CBSAngie CBSAngie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marilyn Kruger View Post
Shouldn't you be given some indication that you might be let go? Is it appropreate to wait until the very last day? Or are you telling me that a person should expect that they might be terminated even if they feel that empolyer is satisfied with their preformance?
from what i know any empolyer in nebraska can fire an employee without warning and without any reason why. it is poor managment, however not illegal.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-29-2008, 10:54 AM
cyjeff cyjeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,208
Default

Again.

At the top left of each post is the date.

Please reserve your "Yeah, me too" comments for posts generated within the last month or so... okay?

We get it, you live in Nebraska. You don't have to answer every Nebraska or adultery related posting.
__________________
Not everything that makes you mad, sad or uncomfortable is legally actionable.

I am not now nor ever was an attorney.

Any statements I make are based purely upon my personal experiences and research which may or may not be accurate in a court of law.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-29-2008, 12:07 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

Jeff, I could have lived without the last comment, okay?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2008, 08:18 PM
CBSAngie CBSAngie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyjeff View Post
Again.

At the top left of each post is the date.

Please reserve your "Yeah, me too" comments for posts generated within the last month or so... okay?

We get it, you live in Nebraska. You don't have to answer every Nebraska or adultery related posting.
i apologize cyjeff, i did not relaize these we older posts. i just assumed if they we no longer active people would not be able to respond.
again im sorry
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wrongfull Termination Question in Illinois dcomer Wrongful Termination Laws 3 02-06-2006 11:26 AM
OR: Delay in notification of termination. leigha Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 3 11-01-2005 04:15 PM
wrongfull termination aimie Wrongful Termination Laws 5 09-16-2005 12:54 PM
wrongfull termination partnerscomp legal discussion 11 02-21-2005 05:32 PM
Wrongfull Termination AMORYDEE Wrongful Termination Laws 1 09-29-2004 03:52 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming