Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Nebraska Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-03-2006, 10:36 AM
sissb1 sissb1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Default Relaxed dress code to new one if I don't change

The company I work for has had a relaxed dress code for the office. They keep the office very warm in the summer and I dress in Skorts and short sleave tops. There is one lady in the office that doesn't like what I wear. My office manager said that if I keep wearing the skorts (that come to mid thigh length) the entire office will have to go to a dress code. 1st of all my office manager wore the same skorts last 2 yrs and on Fridays we were told that we could wear shorts. The Skorts are longer and dressy compared to the shorts or jeans that everyone wears. My question if I should choose to continue wearing my skorts this year and they impliment a dress do I have any legal rights? If they make me change my dress am I entitled to a clothing allowance? The business is in Nebraska
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2006, 10:50 AM
Marketeer Marketeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,028
Post

The employer has every right to change the dress code as they see fit. They do not have to subsidize this change financially. Unless your entire wardrobe consists of skorts and nothing else, I would think that you'd have clothing that would workd.

The only time that an employer generally must pay for employee work wear is if they require a uniform that cannot be worn elsewhere. For example, if a restaurant requires employees to wear black bottoms (skirt or slacks) and white top, it doesn't have to pay employees for those pieces. If it requires a specific uniform with the name of the restaurant all over it, then the employer must provide the uniforms to the employees.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-04-2006, 06:00 AM
Beth3 Beth3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,615
Default

My question if I should choose to continue wearing my skorts this year and they impliment a dress do I have any legal rights? Nope.

If they make me change my dress am I entitled to a clothing allowance? Nope.

In my opinion, any garment that's only mid-thigh length is too short to be appropriate for office wear but your employer gets to exercise their own judgment. If they don't like your skorts, then you have the choice of changing your attire to adhere to their requirements, refusing to do so and being fired, or looking for a new job elsewhere where you can dress as you please.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2006, 10:24 AM
sissb1 sissb1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Default Dress Code question # 2

Is it ok for them to only give me the dress code when others wear shorts and jeans and t-shirts to work? Shouldn't everyone have the same code in the office? I don't have a problem changing as long as everyone is included. Otherwise I feel like that is a form of discrimination. Does it need to be a written policy? Thank you for your responses.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-04-2006, 10:28 AM
Marketeer Marketeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,028
Post

No, the dress code does not have to take the form of a written policy. Unless you are being singled out because of a protected characteristic (on the basis of your age, sex, national origin, etc.) it's not discrmination.

There could be reasons to have different standards of dress for different classes of employees.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2006, 10:36 AM
sissb1 sissb1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Default reply

I am talking about the other office ladies. We are all the same in everything else, just various parts of the office work on the computer.

Last edited by sissb1; 04-04-2006 at 10:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-04-2006, 10:39 AM
Marketeer Marketeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,028
Default

Again, unless you are being singled out because of a protected characteristic (on the basis of your age, sex, national origin, etc.) it's not illegal discrmination. There are lots of things in life that aren't fair, but that doesn't make it illegal. Plus, your original post says that "entire office will have to go to a dress code" which sounds like it will affect everyone. You may be the most affected because your current mode of dress is not what the dress code will include, but that does not mean that you're being discriminated against.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-04-2006, 10:50 AM
sissb1 sissb1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Default Reply

No, my original post said that if I didn't change what I was wearing they would write a dress code for the whole office. Again, I don't have a problem changing but the more I thought about the more I felt they should include the whole office. Unfortuntely, A small number of people that is vocal, makes it hard on the masses. The reason I even wanted to know about dress code law is because I don't want to be one of those that ruin things for the whole. But I did want to know my rights. Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-04-2006, 11:07 AM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

So, if you continue to wear what you want they'll write a dress code that affects everyone? Nothing illegal about that.

You do not, repeat, do not, have the right to wear whatever you want to work. If they don't want you to wear skorts, you don't wear skorts.

It would seem that for some reason they have a problem with skorts but not shorts. That is their right.

As far as providing you with a clothing allowance, my first thought on reading that was that this has GOT to be a joke post.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-08-2006, 06:22 AM
kevlor kevlor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
Default

Curious here, what if an employer (restaurant) requires you to buy your shoes from a specific retailer? Would that not qualify for a clothing allowance?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-09-2006, 06:24 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

Not necessarily. It would depend on the shoes; also state law.

Off the top of my head, I am not aware of any circumstances in any state where a clothing allowance is required, though there are some circumstances in which the employer would be required to pay for the uniform.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-10-2006, 06:13 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,688
Default

I don't know of any either, cbg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Terminated for inability to wear dress code Dragonfire Personal Debt 7 10-15-2005 07:46 PM
US v Schiff JJ Federal and State Tax Law 3 07-24-2005 01:36 PM
The 861 Argument Dale Eastman Federal and State Tax Law 25 06-15-2005 04:27 AM
For a Chuckle Dale Eastman Federal and State Tax Law 31 06-13-2005 04:56 AM
Hot Deals Starting 12/12 zoomer US Immigration Law 7 12-13-2003 04:29 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming