Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Virginia Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2006, 09:18 AM
akcoop akcoop is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3
Default is this wrongful termination and discrimation

STATE OF VIRGINIA

Recently I was terminated by my employer for violating the companies conflict of interest policy. I recently married an employee of one of their vendors. The company policy states the following; Conflict of interest: All employees must conduct their affairs in a matter that does not conflict with the companies interest, you should not enter into any transactions acquire any interest in or take any action contrary to the company or incompatible with the loyalties an obligations inherent in your employment. This policy applies equally to member of an employee’s immediate family or other relatives living in the employee’s household. For example you may not directly or indirectly (as a director, officer, partner , member, manager, employee, or agent with the company or furnish any services to the company as a independent contractor). You may not use the company’s name to further any interest, if you have nonpublic information that the company is about to buy property or expand an existing site, you may not invest in land or in any businesses near the proposed new site. If you are uncertain about entering into any transaction or taking any action that may not be in the interest of the company or compatible with the loyalty and the obligations given inherent in you employment you must first contact the chairman, president or cfo of the company. If you find that you are in a situation contrary to company policy, you must promptly take remdial steps in consultation with either the chairman, president or cfo. The company claimed that my husband was owner of the company, which he brought after my termination. They have insisted that I funished this contract to his company even though they have the previous owners tax records along with the contract. In addition, there is another female employee of a different race than I who is dating a vendor. This gentleman is the owner of the company and they have not terminated her.

My question is this did my marrying a vendors employee violate the conflict outlined above and two. Why have I been treated differently than my counterpart.

thanks so much for your assistance.

Last edited by akcoop; 03-24-2006 at 09:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-24-2006, 09:33 AM
mlane58 mlane58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas or where the wind blows
Posts: 1,145
Default

Quote:
This policy applies equally to member of an employee’s immediate family or other relatives living in the employee’s household.
Quote:
In addition, there is another female employee of a different race than I who is dating a vendor.
The policy that you posted doesn't infer anything about dating, just relatives. Based on the post it doesn't appear that anything illegal was done by your employer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2006, 09:38 AM
akcoop akcoop is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3
Default wrongful

Does it matter if the company already had a contract with this vendor before I married him. Also the policy refers to vendors which my husband is not.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-24-2006, 09:49 AM
mlane58 mlane58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas or where the wind blows
Posts: 1,145
Default

Quote:
Does it matter if the company already had a contract with this vendor before I married him. Also the policy refers to vendors which my husband is not.
Now I am confused, you made it sound as if your husband was part of this company prior to him purchasing it. Would that be correct? If I am wrong on that assumption, I apoligize.

If your husband was not part of the company before than the company still did not perform any lillegal action even though you percieve they did because the employee is a different race and you would have a hard time trying to convince anyone of that.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-24-2006, 01:21 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

Well, for one thing, you married the employee and your co-working is only dating one. That's a sufficient difference right there.

A wrongful termination means that you were fired for a reason that is prohibited by law. Unless you are able to point to a law that says you can't be fired for marrying someone that the employer perceives as a conflict of interest, this is a legal termination.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming