Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > Maternity Leave - Pregnancy Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-01-2004, 05:38 PM
dakrtgrl dakrtgrl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2
Exclamation New job and pregnancy

Hello,
My husband and I live in AZ and we want to try and start our family. I am graduating from college in December but I would like to start trying to get pregnant now. Most of the job offers I have received out of college will start in January and February. If I get pregnant before starting one of their positions will their insurance have to cover my maternity care or is it considered a pre-existing condition? Keep in mind that the benefits for the jobs start on day 1. How about the FMLA and short term disability? Will I still be able to get short term disability? I dont want to start trying to get pregnant, my future employer wont cover my maternity care, and then I am stuck at the same job I have now. Thanks for your help!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2004, 06:49 AM
LConnell LConnell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,056
Default Pregnancy

Hi, Arizona person. I'm in Ahwatukee. In any case, are you covered by insurance now? Under HIPAA, if you have insurance now through a company-sponsored plan and you go to new insurance without any break in coverage, your conditions that existed under the previous plan will continue to be covered.

To be covered under FMLA, you must work at least 1250 hours over a one year period in order to be eligible for leave AND your employer must have at least 50 employees in a 75 mile radius. So, under FMLA, you will not be eligible for a leave until January 2006 at the earliest (assuming you start work in January 2005).

Eligiblity for short-term disability is dependent upon the plan that you participate in. Many employers do not have short-term disability plans.

Congrats on your marriage. Let me know if you have any other questions.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2004, 10:12 AM
dakrtgrl dakrtgrl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2
Default Thanks

Hello,
Thank you for your help! So does that mean that they do not have to give me the six weeks off after a pregnancy? Could they just let me go?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2004, 04:52 PM
LConnell LConnell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,056
Default Leave

They could let you go if that's what they do with others who are not pregnant and who need to take six or more weeks off. The reason that they can't treat you any differently is that pregnancy is protected by federal discrimination laws.

Also, be aware that federal discrimination laws only apply to employers who have at least 15 employees.

Let me know if you have any other questions.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2005, 09:04 PM
Noelle102005 Noelle102005 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2
Default

My company provided insurance and sold the property I now mange to a new company that advised me to take Cobra instead of taking their new insurance and they would pay for it, since I was already pregnant. Now they do not want to pay the Cobra after a few months. Am I still eligible to get the benefits of the new insurance for the new company? All other nonpregnant employees were eligible on day one of the transition. Would my pregnancy be considered a pre-existing condition and not cover me on the new insurance?

Last edited by Noelle102005; 09-29-2005 at 09:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-01-2005, 08:47 AM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,714
Default

By law, pregnancy cannot be considered a pre-existing condition on a employer sponsored group health plan. But without reading the policy we cannot know if you are still eligible to join the new plan or if you will have to wait for the next open enrollment period. There is nothing stopping you from continuing to pay your COBRA yourself.

But if all non-pregnant employees were eligible on day one of their employment, you may have case to put before the EEOC.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming