![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I work for a company in Virginia. We have run into a problem, we give 2 (15 min breaks paid and 1/2 lunch break unpaid. We have let people that do not take 15 minute breaks to use it towards their lunch, so they will take a 1 hour lunch but be paid for 1/2 for it. Is this the right way? Should it be that you take the break or lose it. We want to make sure we are fair to the people taking breaks and non break people.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Personally, I would not allow that. Since you are already offering more than the law requires, you can specify when breaks are used. If they choose not to take a break, that's fine, but you're not going to give them an extra 30 minutes for lunch (paid or unpaid) because of it.
Just my $.02, but I think you'll find others agreeing here as well. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Breaks, Lunch, Overtime question | sallizar | South Carolina Labor Laws | 13 | 01-25-2007 01:36 PM |
| Question about lunch breaks in Missouri | Razzy | Missouri Labor Laws | 1 | 08-02-2005 08:19 AM |
| Lunch Breaks | budzette | Labor Laws | 1 | 02-19-2005 05:09 PM |
| Are salaried non-exempt employees in South Carolina required to take lunch breaks? | momonimosimus | Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws | 1 | 01-12-2005 12:55 AM |
| Are salaried non-exempt employees in South Carolina required to take lunch breaks? | momonimosimus | Labor Laws | 1 | 01-12-2005 12:54 AM |