Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Iowa Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2006, 12:17 PM
cvc42 cvc42 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11
Default Iowa Case Law

I just quit a job that I held for 5 months. I was asked to apply for a position in the Telecom Dept at a Hospital. I was for 5 years a Vendor employed phone tech at this same hospital. I had an excellent reputation form my employer and the hospital. I was asked to apply for a recently vacated Administrative position in the Telecom Dept and did so at the request of the head of Telecom for the hospital. With in weeks it became a nightmare. The individual turned out to be very controlling and horrid person to work with. We shared the same cubicle togother. This person was to train me and teach me the processes of the dept. The training stopped within a few weeks. Finally on Dec 6th I forced a conversation about what the problem was. This person said I quote(I just thought you knew what what we did in this dept. I asked the question Do you want me gone? The answer was yes. I got an e-mail later telling me I should move on. The VP of the dept said he does what ever he is told by her as it relates to Telecom as he has no background in it. This is the boss! I asked if I had her support to go back to my old employer. I was told by everyone involved that I had there support to do so. But My old emplyer refused to hire me back. I could not take the stress any longer. I even called in on a Compliance hotline to try and get the matter rectfied. They invertigate problems that can't be handled in the normal channels. That was a week ago, I have heard nothing. There are some other things as well but don't bare repeating here. Do I have a case??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2006, 12:22 PM
Marketeer Marketeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,028
Default

A case for what? Unless the supervisor is singling you for this behavior on the basis of your race, religion, national origin, etc., the behavior you've described is not illegal. Unfortunately, it sounds like you're working for a micromanaging jerk whose behavior is tolerated by the organization.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-19-2006, 12:23 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

A case for what? Sorry, but your question is not clear. I don't know if you're asking about a case for wrongful termination, unemployment benefits, to get your old job back, or what. Please clarify and I'll try to help.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2006, 01:36 PM
cvc42 cvc42 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11
Default

Sorry didn't make myself clear. I was basically set up to fail. The training and communication had stopped. She was responsible for my training, I would literally sit and stare at my computer. My phone quit ringing and all request's for work from people at the hospital stopped. Since I quit, I can't sue I guess but would I be able to have a case for unemployment while I look for work?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-19-2006, 03:39 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

You wouldn't be able to sue in any case, since nothing illegal transpired.

It is next to impossible get unemployment benefits if you quit. By all means apply, but on the basis of what you have posted it's extremely unlikely that you will qualify. Not getting along with your manager is not considered a valid reason to quit and still get benefits.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-19-2006, 03:42 PM
cvc42 cvc42 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11
Default

Thanks I figured as much just have to chalk it as a learning experience. Thanks and great site!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-24-2006, 05:48 AM
cvc42 cvc42 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11
Default

I have a question about unemployment. Since I only worked at my last job for 5 months don't you have to be employed for 6 months before you can claim benifits? And if thats true, would they go back on my previous emplyer who I worked for for 5.5 years. I think I have a case for unemplyment. So I am trying to get the facts on how it works in IOWA. Who would the calim go against?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-24-2006, 05:55 AM
cvc42 cvc42 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11
Default

One more question, can I use e-mails from from old job in my unemployment case?? Is it legal or could I get in trouble for doing so.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-24-2006, 05:10 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

I'm sorry, but my charts do not provide the information you are asking for. You'll need to call the state UI commission if it matters to you which employer would be charged.

There could be factors that you have not mentioned, but on the basis of what you have included in your post I do not believe that you will qualify for unemployment. My charts do include information on who can quit and still get UI, and I can't find any reason listed for Iowa except illness in the family.

There is nothing in the law that I am aware of that prohibits you from using e-mails in your appeal, but again I do not believe that you qualify under Iowa law.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-24-2006, 05:26 PM
cvc42 cvc42 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11
Default

I was continually harrassed at work by my coworker who was to train me, on one incident she tossed a book at me and swore. Here is an exert from an e-mail she sent me.

You need to decide what you are going to do with your job at BLANK Although you are on-call, I have fielded helpdesk calls for you all week because you have not been at your desk to answer them. You have been at your desk less than three hours these last two days. This is why I paged you that I will take call. Since there is basically no communication between us regarding work, and you are not here to support our users, I felt it was best that I take it over immediately.

It's a shame that this has turned out this way. I need a co-worker that is willing to put forth the effort to work in this position. If that is not your intention, then you need to move on.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-24-2006, 05:33 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

My opinion has not changed. I will be very surprised if the Iowa UI commission determines that this was egregarious enough to allow you to quit and still receive benefits.

I'm not telling you not to try, but you said you wanted to know how it worked in Iowa, and I can find nothing in Iowa law to suggest that this would be sufficent "good cause" to quit and get benefits. In fact, I can't think of a state in which this would be sufficient to quit and get benefits.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iowa Your Rights Under The Iowa Minimum Wage Labor Law Poster laborlaw Iowa Labor Laws 0 05-24-2005 09:15 AM
Iowa Safety And Health Protection On The Job Labor Law Poster laborlaw Iowa Labor Laws 0 05-24-2005 09:03 AM
An analytical look at detaxcanada.org StaR Federal and State Tax Law 4 04-21-2005 08:28 AM
Supreme Court of Canada agrees with StaR StaR General Tax Law 0 03-27-2005 03:08 AM
Tax Protestor David Lindsay Loses In Court Again StaR Federal and State Tax Law 0 03-25-2005 03:03 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming