>Subject: Re: REUNION SPARKS ANGER
Quote:
From: Jackie jdajda@newsguy.comDate: 6/25/03 5:16 AM Pacific Daylight TimeMessage-id: <fi4jfvkp5b5vi97uttsnhom05gcjudgcts@4ax.com>On 24 Jun 2003 16:20:02 GMT, reneekarynracine@aol.comhomesafe (KathyT) wrote:
Quote:
|
So far, nobody has said she should be bypassed. I can only speak for
|
myself.
Quote:
|
I said the level of emotions that goes into a reunion with siblings, and
|
other
Quote:
|
bfamily members is not the same as it is with the bmother. I've been
|
through a
Quote:
|
series of reunions, and can say that the one with my bmom, while it is the
|
one
Quote:
|
that means the most to me, was the most emotional. I would not have been
|
ready
Quote:
|
at 16. I would not have felt ready, and even if I'd have thought about it (Ihad not) I wouldn't have followed through with it at that time.
|
Do you think it okay that the woman has to hear about her relinquishedson or daughter through her other son or daughter?Do you ever wonder if that is painful for the woman?Do you care?Or is she guilty no matter what.Jackie
|
Geeesh, after all these years, you are still so clueless.
Kathy
"To err is human; to forgive, divine."
06-25-2003, 09:58 AM
REUNION SPARKS ANGER
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
