Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Arizona Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2005, 08:13 AM
markiewilliams markiewilliams is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1
Default Vacation Pay: Not paid

I was terminated on Dec 22. I have been with company for 18 years. I earned 3 weeks vacation and after the 1st of the next year I could use it. But when I was terminated I was 8 days from recieving my accumulated vacation pay. Is there any laws that will allow me to get this vacation even if I was terminated 8 days before the new allocation.
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2005, 08:15 AM
Beth3 Beth3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,615
Default

No. Arizona leaves the payment of vacation upon separation up to each employer. If your employer's policy is not to pay out vacation that is not fully earned, it's legal.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2006, 08:48 AM
Ernie Ernie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rio Rico, Arizona
Posts: 1
Default PTO hours

I have been working for the company for almost 9 years & i have accumalated more than 200 hours... I gave my employer a 2 week notice on 02/06/06 and on 02/10/06 we received a new handbook saying that employee will only get payed 59% of the hours.. Does this aplly to me even if i gave my 2 weeks notice before new handbook was given? The hand book i signed before does not say anything about us only getting payed 59%... Also handbbok has a revised date of Sept 2005 and it was given to us last week... I had a friend of mine leave to company 3 weeks ago & he got payed 100% of his hours.... Are my hours retroactive ??
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-14-2006, 09:22 AM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

You are subject to the company policies that exist AT THE TIME. The fact that a previous handbook said something different is irrelevant.

Under the law, they don't HAVE to pay you anything at all.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-01-2006, 04:19 PM
azxraytech azxraytech is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1
Default please help

i was recentliy fired from my job after being there 1 year and 1 month! they did not pay me for the vacation time of 2 weeks that i had earned when just two weeks prior to my termination we had meetings stating i was getting enrolled in profit sharing, medical, and that i had earned my two weeks vacation.
is it legal for them to not pay me since i earned this vacation time!?? and if it is who should i contact about it??
thanks in advance
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-01-2006, 05:36 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

Yes, it is legal for them NOT to pay it. AZ law does not require the payout of unused vacation time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Advice on Final Pay and Vacation Pay in CA Rezzerected Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 10 02-03-2006 03:10 PM
vacation pay and overtime pay in california katemarie California Labor Laws 2 10-17-2005 10:12 AM
Holiday Pay - Kentucky reefland Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 5 09-09-2005 05:18 AM
Resignation Notice + Vacation Pay + relo payback jglenn Labor Laws 3 07-06-2005 02:29 PM
Paid for Vacation Time? JustWondering Virginia Labor Laws 1 06-18-2005 01:10 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming