Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Texas Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2005, 12:31 PM
acmagician acmagician is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1
Default on call travel pay

I work for a service oriented business in Texas. We are required to be "on call" every third week including Sat. and Sun. We are subject to being called out 24 hours a day. We drive a company vehicle to and from the customers job site. Are we entitled to be paid from the time we leave home till the time we return?

Last edited by acmagician; 07-05-2005 at 12:43 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2005, 08:34 AM
trademan trademan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3
Default

The below is from the Texas Workforce site

H. Travel Time

The easiest way to think of the travel time regulations is to remember that basically, any travel on company business that cuts across the normal workday is compensable time worked, regardless of whether such travel occurs on a day the employee is normally scheduled for work.


The wage and hour regulation at 29 C.F.R. 785.33 states that whether time spent in travel must be considered working time depends upon the kind of travel involved. The general rule is found in 29 C.F.R. 785.35, which provides that "normal travel from home to work is not worktime". That means that the normal commute from home to work and vice-versa is not compensable. However, 29 C.F.R. 785.36 states that home to work travel and back again that falls outside of the regular hours may be compensable hours worked. For example, if the worker is called back to work somewhere on an emergency basis for one of the employer's customers and must travel a "substantial" distance, the travel time would be compensable. The regulation does not provide that all such travel time is compensable; the decision would presumably be made on a case-by-case basis. Similarly, a special temporary assignment in another city would involve compensable travel time, according to 29 C.F.R. 785.37, but the employer could disregard the time corresponding to the normal home-to-work commute and the time spent on meals.

Time spent traveling between worksites during a workday is compensable under 29 C.F.R. 785.38. For example, if a worker reports to the main office to start the day and is then told to report to another job site, all time spent traveling to that worksite and back again to the main office will be paid. Some workers normally report to a number of jobsites each day as part of their duties; all such time is compensable. If the worker does not have to report back to the main office after finishing at the last jobsite, but instead returns directly home, the time spent returning home is not compensable.

Many questions arise concerning travel to other locations involving overnight stays. 29 C.F.R. 785.39 states that "travel away from home is clearly worktime when it cuts across the employee's workday. The employee is simply substituting travel for other duties." However, if the employee travels as a passenger outside normal working hours, the time is not compensable. An employee who serves as a driver or a pilot for other employees would be paid for the entire travel time. This same rule applies even in the case of travel on days not normally worked. For instance, if the normal hours are 8 am to 5 pm from Monday through Friday, and the employee must perform job-related travel on Sunday from 3 pm to 7 pm, the employer would need to pay only for the time from 3 to 5 pm. Similarly, work performed while traveling must be counted as hours worked under 29 C.F.R. 785.41.

The travel time should be paid at the employee's regular rate of pay; if travel time is paid by agreement at a rate less than the employee's normal pay rate for non-travel duties, exact records of non-travel time and travel time would have to be maintained, and the regular rate of pay would be calculated using the "weighted average" method – see 29 C.F.R. 778.115 and 778.318(b). This lower rate of pay for travel is mentioned in an administrative opinion from DOL dated January 22, 1999 (BNA, WHM 99:8211), which basically states that paying a lower rate of pay for travel time is allowed under the FLSA as long as the rate is at least minimum wage, and that the regular rate for overtime purposes would be the weighted average of the two rates (29 C.F.R. 778.115).


Strategic tip: paying employees a different rate of pay for travel time is generally inadvisable due to the complexity of the overtime calculation method necessary and the recordkeeping involved; in addition, any company attempting this should do so only on the basis of a clear written agreement prepared with the assistance of an attorney experienced in this area of the law.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reporting Pay/Min Hours Worked LLayman Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 19 03-21-2007 11:44 PM
Overtime - How to Calculate - GA dchamby Overtime Laws 3 10-09-2005 11:09 AM
On Call quaint002 Labor Laws 6 06-22-2005 06:26 AM
on call, orientation, training class pay in MD kellyb Labor Laws 1 05-23-2005 02:44 PM
Requiring Travel Beaderbabe Labor Laws 1 05-03-2005 06:58 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming