Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Arizona Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-17-2005, 04:23 PM
hockeylord hockeylord is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Default Wrongful accusation, termination lead to withholding last check in AZ

I was a bar manager for a small hotel for 8 months. I was wrongfully dismissed when I was accused of stealing money from the register. When 72 hours had passed (I believe AZ law states, "when an employee is terminated they are to receive all wages owed within 72 hours.") I left a message for the accountant inquiring when I would be receiving my last check. The next day a message was left for me by the owner saying, "authorities have been contacted, an investigation is underway and they are under no obligation to give me my final check until said investigation has concluded." Tomorrow will be 4 weeks to the day of my ceasing to work there.

So my obvious questions are:

(a)Is this withholding truly a legal process?

(b)If it is legal, how long must I wait 'til this alleged investigation has run
its course? Aside from the owner's message I have heard nothing
since from my previous employer or any "authorities."

Any advice or answers on this topic would be most appreciated.

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-17-2005, 04:55 PM
Pattymd Pattymd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,685
Default

No, that is not legal. There is no provision in the law for that, or any other, exception.
http://www.ica.state.az.us/Labor/lalawfaq.htm#Q5

BTW, that was not, legally a wrongful termination. May not have been fair (often, employers merely suspend employee's during such investigations) but it doesn't rise to the level of a "wrongful termination" under the law.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18-2005, 05:54 AM
hockeylord hockeylord is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Default reply

Thank you for your timely response, I appreciate the help. I thought it probably wasn't a wrongful termination, but figured no harm in asking a pro. It was morally incorrect, but legally fine. My query was more directed at the last check issue than at my being dishonestly discharged.

Just one more follow-up if I may...what would your advice (or if there is a proper legal channel) be regarding how I approach this with my former employer? Obviously due to the fact that I was maliciously lied to about the status of my check I anticipate some animosity when I bring that fact to their attention. Any thoughts in this matter would also be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

hl
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18-2005, 10:00 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,685
Default

"Are you aware that state law required you to give me my final paycheck on my last day worked? Here's a copy of a reference stating that requirement. I'd hate to have to file a complaint with the state Dept. of Labor, but if the check is not ready by the end of the day, I will have to do that."

How about that?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-18-2005, 02:12 PM
hockeylord hockeylord is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Default just one more thought...

Thank you again for the advice, just one more question so I can be sure I'm throughly prepared for any counter-argument they may have. After reading the Q&A site you gave me a link to I just wonder if this portion "An employer may only withhold an employee’s wages when the employer has a good faith dispute as to the amount of wages due, including the amount of any counterclaim, reimbursement, recoupment or set-off asserted by the employer." Their "alleged investigation" wouldn't or doesn't fall under those parameters, that is what you're telling me, correct? If so, looking at it from their warped perspective, what would their recourse be if indeed this was a proper allegation? They positively have no right to withhold my check under these circumstances is what I'm looking to be able to say definitively. It seems to be a bit of a gray area there or perhaps I'm just not reading it properly. Please pardon my meticulousness (did I just invent that word?), but I know they're gonna be difficult about this and I just wanna make sure the law is indeed on my side.

Thank you again for your help and tolerance,

hl
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-19-2005, 04:39 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,685
Default

Personally, I wouldn't buy that. It's not his wages that are in dispute. I would go ahead and file immediately. There's no way we can know what the state will say if the employer uses that as a defense, but you have nothing to lose by filing.

Last edited by Pattymd; 11-19-2005 at 04:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wrongful Termination rendonrea Wrongful Termination Laws 12 09-05-2006 09:05 AM
Wrongful termination? snickers2004 Wrongful Termination Laws 2 04-02-2005 05:30 PM
wrongful termination? bkw Discrimination Laws 2 03-27-2005 01:30 AM
Wrongful Termination 01jib Wrongful Termination Laws 1 03-24-2005 10:35 AM
Is this considered Harassment or Wrongful Termination? azieg Wrongful Termination Laws 3 02-28-2005 07:24 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming