Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Missouri Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2005, 10:09 AM
cjohanningmeier cjohanningmeier is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
Question Missouri wage question

Can an employer hold an employees check due to no identification on the employee?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-22-2005, 11:14 AM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,709
Default

Probably not, but a definite answer will require more detail.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2005, 11:45 AM
cjohanningmeier cjohanningmeier is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbg
Probably not, but a definite answer will require more detail.
The employer requires a form of identification to pick up the paycheck. If they do not have identification they are not allowed to pick up the paycheck until they bring their identification in then they are allowed to pick up the check
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2005, 01:01 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,709
Default

I can't find anything in the MO laws that makes that practice illegal. Patty might have additional information.

A simple solution to the problem would be for the employee to have their identification when they go to collect their check.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-22-2005, 01:06 PM
Pattymd Pattymd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,685
Default

The employer is not "holding" the check. The employer is requiring the employee to produce the identification he requires to release it. This is also known as a "physical payout" in the payroll world. This is only smart. How would you like it if someone else went up to the holder of the paychecks, said they were you, and proceeded to receive your paycheck?

cbg is right. Just bring the identification and there is no issue.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-22-2005, 01:23 PM
cjohanningmeier cjohanningmeier is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjohanningmeier
Can an employer hold an employees check due to no identification on the employee?
Thank you so very much for your information cbg and Patty. I appreciate the input. Have a wonderful day.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question for Quebec immegration interview AMIT PURI Canada Immigration Law 8 06-05-2009 09:03 AM
Nebraska Minimum Wage Labor Law Poster laborlaw Nebraska Labor Laws 0 05-25-2005 12:21 PM
Michigan Wage Hour Division, Wage Deviation Labor Law Poster laborlaw Michigan Labor Laws 0 05-25-2005 09:44 AM
Pennsylvania MINIMUM WAGE LAW Labor Law Poster laborlaw legal discussion 0 05-24-2005 02:04 PM
Iowa Your Rights Under The Iowa Minimum Wage Labor Law Poster laborlaw Iowa Labor Laws 0 05-24-2005 09:15 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming