Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Maryland Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-08-2005, 04:53 PM
smith7483 smith7483 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
Default only person laid off during downsizing

supposedly i was laid off due to downsizing on 6/6/05 my boss never cared for me and she made this known i was supposed to be fired (she didnt know that i knew) during my probationary period but one of my co workers quit so she needed me then she hired 5 more people and everything settled down she still made it known she didnt like me she said i draw to much attention i was a dispatcher for direct t.v so alot of males came in the office and i befriended many of them which she didnt agree with however she would never negotiate with me on my sched since i was her only employee who was unmarried and without children she stated that my schedule is flexible which is untrue i do and did still have a life even if i dont have children and i believe that is a personal issue which has nothing to due with job performance i was told i was being laid off due to downsizing however nobody else was let go i was given no paperwork to sign and as far as i knew my job operated on seniority there were 5 people hired well after me a few still on probation but they all have children i contacted my regional manager who said it was at my bosses discretion who to let go but she still has to inform me why she chose me i have yet to recieve that phone call with my explantation i want to know if this would be worth taking to court if this is even legal to lay me off due to her believing that i would be less affected due to not having any responsiblities as far as children or a husband etc
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-08-2005, 04:58 PM
LConnell LConnell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,056
Default Only Person Laid Off During Downsizing

Your employer doesn't have to explain why you were selected. However, laying off a person because they are less flexible in being able to work additional hours or to accommodate changes in schedules than others is a legitimate business reason.

Of course, I don't have the details of your situation so it would be impossible for me to say whether there is discrimination or not. You may wish to look at the definition of discrimination at www.eeoc.gov.
__________________
Lillian Connell

Forum Moderator
www.laborlawtalk.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-08-2005, 05:08 PM
smith7483 smith7483 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
Default accepted every schedule change

thats my point i accepted every sched change given to me no matter how unfair my boss wanted me to quit because she knew that i didnt have a car so she put me on last shift which made me pay a total of 80.00 per day in a cab 40 to get there 40 to get home and she knew this but thats how much i enjoyed my job i was pass probation so she couldnt just fire me there had to be sufficient reason i called my regional manager and verified that we were downsizing but he stated that being that we operate by seniority she needs to supply me with a reason for choosing to lay me off instead of the last hire and i feel that she hasnt contacted me due to not having a sufficient reason for choosing me besides she doesnt care for me i dont want her to get away with this i can find another job but i want her to suffer some consequences for being immature and unprofessional i have had many people supervisors included come and tell me that she was waiting for the first chance she had to get rid of me, if she can call me and justify her reasons then i will walk quietly but until then i will make there lives hell
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-08-2005, 05:22 PM
LConnell LConnell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,056
Default Retribution

While I understand your frustration, I do strongly recommend that you file a claim with the Maryland Commission on Human Relations. http://www.mchr.state.md.us/

The MCHR will be able to walk you through a decision as to whether you are a victom of discrimination. If they agree that you are, they will work with you in pursuing resolution with your former employer. If they don't agree with you, they will issue you a "right to sue" letter with a ruling that they could not find evidence of discrimination. With that letter, you can file a lawsuit against your former employer. However, keep in mind that without a "cause" determination (where the agency says that there is cause to believe that discrimination exists), you will be hard-pressed to find an attorney who is willing to work with you without you putting out a considerable amount of money. Even with that money, most attorneys will not work with you without that determination.

If you find yourself in that situation, you may wish to consider the mental cost of continuing to think about the employer. Most people find it better to move on at that point.
__________________
Lillian Connell

Forum Moderator
www.laborlawtalk.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A good example of a brainwashed taxslave... StaR General Tax Law 2 12-14-2006 04:14 AM
Sec. 6109. Identifying numbers Dale Eastman Federal and State Tax Law 56 05-12-2005 04:39 AM
A reply to a sock puppet's second hand posting of stuff from DanEvan's web page. Dale Eastman Federal and State Tax Law 33 05-06-2005 12:07 PM
Supreme Court of Canada agrees with StaR StaR General Tax Law 0 03-27-2005 03:08 AM
Tax Protestor David Lindsay Loses In Court Again StaR Federal and State Tax Law 0 03-25-2005 03:03 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming