Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Nebraska Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2009, 12:41 AM
Notaboss Notaboss is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4
Default Overnight Shift Nebraska

Hoping someone can help as I'm finding very little under labor laws.
Ok, work is 10 hours (11 total if you count the one hour lunch shift) at a retail establishment as a night stocker.
The stores is closed to customers by 9 pm, when we come in. Just recently, they "locked" us in, with no ability to go outside and smoke (yes I am a smoker) and we have to stay in the building for the full one hour lunch break. I would rather work and leave an hour earlier then sit stuck in a building for a full hour. Does anyone know if this is legal?
Also, is it legal to not allow smokers the ability to smoke, but then still allow people that dip/chew to have their form of tobacco?
Thank you for your assistance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-12-2009, 01:00 AM
Betty3 Betty3 is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Il.(near STL,Mo.)
Posts: 6,515
Default

Yes, it's legal. If your employer requires you to take a one hour lunch break, then you must take it. You can be required to remain on the premises (in the building).

It's also legal to not allow smokers of cigarettes to smoke but allow others to use other forms of tobacco.
__________________
What do we live for if not to make the world less difficult for each other? George Eliot
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-15-2009, 12:51 PM
Notaboss Notaboss is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4
Default

Thank you so much for clearing it up, Betty. Just wanted to know where I stand.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-10-2009, 07:44 AM
FLHT FLHT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Default

I think Betty3 may be off a bit

48-212. Lunch hour; requirements; applicability. Any person, firm, or corporation owning or operating an assembling plant, workshop, or mechanical establishment employing one or more persons shall allow all of their employees not less than thirty consecutive minutes for lunch in each eight-hour shift, and during such time it shall be unlawful for any such employer to require such employee or employees to remain in buildings or on the premises where their labor is performed. This section does not apply to employment that is covered by a valid collective-bargaining agreement or other written agreement between an employer and employee.
Source: Laws 1931, c. 96, §1, p. 265; C.S.Supp.,1941, §48-215; R.S.1943, §48-212; Laws 1955, c. 188, §1, p. 536; Laws 2004, LB 382, §1.
Effective date July 16, 2004.
48-213. Lunch hour; violation; penalty. Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of section 48-212 shall be guilty of a Class III misdemeanor.
Source: Laws 1931, c. 96, § 2, p. 266; C.S.Supp.,1941, § 48-216; R.S.1943, § 48-213; Laws 1977, LB 40, § 275.

I would also talk to the fire marshall about them locking you in a building with no way to get out.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-10-2009, 07:50 AM
Eng&SafetyMGR Eng&SafetyMGR is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Philadelphia / South Jersey
Posts: 725
Default

Quote:
Any person, firm, or corporation owning or operating an assembling plant, workshop, or mechanical establishment
I don't see retail mentioned there, is there a clarifications and/or defintions page applicable to your source?
__________________
"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate'' - Sir William of Ockham, a.k.a. Ockham's Razor
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-10-2009, 08:19 AM
FLHT FLHT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Default

This is all I had found while searching for an answer to another question I have. However myself I wouldnt be as concerned with the lunch break thing as I would about being locked in a building if a fire or other such disaster broke out.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-10-2009, 08:23 AM
Eng&SafetyMGR Eng&SafetyMGR is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Philadelphia / South Jersey
Posts: 725
Default

Hopefully the OP comes back to clarify, but since he said "locked" in quotes I'm assuming that this is more of a policy lock in vs. a physical one.

I would think that retail doors would have panic bars that overide the physical lock from the inside as well.
__________________
"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate'' - Sir William of Ockham, a.k.a. Ockham's Razor
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-10-2009, 08:26 AM
FLHT FLHT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Default

One would hope so.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NYS Shift Premium for Overnight Work New York doogs Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 1 07-22-2008 12:02 PM
MANDATORY MEETING 6 HOURS AFTER END OF OVERNIGHT SHIFT California Becci Labor Laws 3 02-11-2007 08:24 PM
Working the overnight shift in South Carolina Boiywo Overtime Laws 1 12-31-2005 08:11 AM
Nebraska Labor Law Posters laborlaw Nebraska Labor Laws 2 07-27-2005 07:22 AM
State of Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission Labor Law Poster laborlaw Hiring and Firing 0 05-25-2005 12:23 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming