Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Utah Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2008, 02:49 PM
hhm002 hhm002 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Exclamation Threatening to terminate if you get a 2nd job!?

I recently hired an assistant for my home business. She would work four hours per week to do clerical work (data entry, filing, etc.) She called me upset the day before she was to start because her current employer told her that having a second job would jeopardize her work at her day job and they forbid her to work for anyone else. She said she needed her full time income, so she had to quit her second job. I know her company has a noncompete agreement, but the two companies are in no way remotely related to each other.

Can employers terminate employees for having a second job?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-22-2008, 03:34 PM
Pattymd Pattymd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,688
Default

It is perfectly legal for an employer to have a policy against moonlighting. The employer with the full-time primary job may be concerned that she will not be able to work overtime, for example, if she needs to "go to her other job". Your employee obviously decided that it wasn't worth the chance of discharge (which would be a perfectly legal termination).

Maybe you can find someone who wants ONLY part-time and has a more flexible schedule. Perhaps an older worker or a parent with school-age children who wants a few hours out of the house?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-22-2008, 03:42 PM
ScottB ScottB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hhm002 View Post
Can employers terminate employees for having a second job?
Yes, that is legal. Sometimes it makes sense. Sometimes it does not, but it is still legal.

I don't prohibit employees from having another job, but there are problems when they call off from work for me because the other employer wants them to work outside their usual schedule. I then have to scramble to replace them at work.

I don't mind if we agree on your regular schedule and you absolutely refuse to work anything but that (don't ask me for any favors, though). I do mind if you take time off from your regular schedule to work elsewhere.
__________________
Senior Professional in Human Resources and Certified Staffing Professional with over 30 years experience. Any advice provided is based upon experience and education, but does not constitute legal advice.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-22-2008, 08:56 PM
hhm002 hhm002 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Default That's surpising

Wow, I am shocked that is legal. I was the flexible job and she got to choose how much and when she worked.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-22-2008, 11:13 PM
Betty3 Betty3 is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Il.(near STL,Mo.)
Posts: 6,518
Default

Yes, it's legal - it's the full-time employers call no matter how flexible her second job hrs. would be. They don't have to allow it & can terminate employees for having a second job.
__________________
What do we live for if not to make the world less difficult for each other? George Eliot
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-23-2008, 07:58 AM
DAW DAW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,179
Default

More to the point, if you have two employers, both employers can demand that they have first choice on where and when the employee works and both employers can legally terminate the employee for refusing to comply. And both employers can legally say that as their needs change, they can legally change their requirements on the employee. We can talk about which employer is the 1st and which is the 2nd but legally both employers have the same legal ability to dictate hours and conditions of employment.
__________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away".
Philip K. Dick (1928-1982)

If I do not answer a publicly posted question, it is because I do not know the answer. Sending me a PM does not change that. And California is the only state whose laws I am reasonably familiar with. Sending me a PM does not change that either.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-23-2008, 07:34 PM
Betty3 Betty3 is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Il.(near STL,Mo.)
Posts: 6,518
Default

You're right - that's true technically. However, we were just considering *in this case* that she would be more concerned about her full-time job & how that employer felt about her working another job as opposed to her being concerned about the part-time job. Most people would consider the full-time job the primary/main job & the part-time job as a 2nd/secondary job.
__________________
What do we live for if not to make the world less difficult for each other? George Eliot
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
denied unemployment for quiting 2nd job but worked fulltime trigger07 Workers Compensation Laws 7 04-18-2007 09:44 PM
Cut my pay, gave me a second job, then fired me California FirstFire Wrongful Termination Laws 3 04-15-2007 12:37 AM
First Job - A few questions Jasmine85 New York Labor Laws 5 10-19-2005 08:04 AM
Is this job discrimination? The Guy Legal Lounge 4 04-11-2005 06:35 PM
2nd job joeyb Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 1 09-03-2004 03:10 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming