Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > New Hampshire Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:18 PM
OH_NO OH_NO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
Default Exempt employee status New Hampshire

I work for a company where the manager has decided to force his exempt employees log in and out this was not the case for the past 5 3/4 years. Even within the same department other groups do not have this policy. And nothing in the company states exempt employee clock in and out.

The Manager watches the time clock since we are reminded of the clocking in and out policy.

We all received offer letters from the company clearly stating the hours of the day we are to be at work and the amount of hours per week for the pay. Now the manager wants the employee to work OT.

With forcing the exempt employee being forced to clock in and out are they no longer exempt?

Is an offer letter an agreement between you and the company subject to change by a manager?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:28 PM
Marketeer Marketeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,028
Post

Despite a widely held belief to the contrary, there is no law that say that exempt employees are exempt from clocking in or filling out a timesheet daily or doing anything else that tracks their hours. There are many good reasons to have all employees track their hours: safety (knowing whose in the building), benefits (knowing how many hours an employee has accrued toward earning a benefit), and so forth.

Tracking an exempt employee's hours does not make that person non-exempt.

Unless the offer letter rises to the level of a bona fide employment contract (and very, very few offer letters do), the terms it spells out can be changed by the employer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:38 PM
OH_NO OH_NO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
Default

what would language would an offer letter have to have in it to make it a bona fide employment contract?

Also what abought the same department with different policies?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:49 PM
ElleMD ElleMD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 12,080
Default

What constitutes a contract varies by state and is very specific. You really need to consult with a lawyer to see if what you have constitutes a contract. Chances are very good that it does not.

Yes, there can be different policies.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:29 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,714
Default

I'd be very careful about trying to turn an offer letter into a contract. Since it won't have spelled out any other changes either, you won't be eligible for raises, or increases in vacation, or any additional benefits that are not listed. You can't have the offer letter be a contract when it's something you don't want to do, but then have it not be a contract when it would benefit you not to be. If the offer letter is a contract, then as well as not being able to be required to sign in and out, the salary and other benefits mentioned in the letter are also carved in stone and can never be changed. Do you really want that to be the case?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Salaried overtime in California espresso Overtime Laws 16 03-15-2008 04:54 PM
Suspended Florida rnb123 Florida Labor Laws 14 10-15-2007 01:12 PM
Is this legal Connecticut scottb908 Connecticut Labor Laws 6 09-13-2006 05:16 PM
=> Definitive Proof GW Bu$h DESERTED his military service ! <= ** Bu$h's Porch Monkey ** Consumer Law and Fraud 0 08-12-2004 08:31 AM
U.S. V. Melekh, 190 F.Supp. 67 (S.D.N.Y. 1960) (USSR espionagecase, diplomatic immuni Tam Registration and Title 0 12-06-2003 07:36 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming