Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Utah Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2007, 08:26 PM
from_mars from_mars is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Default My choice for less than 40 affects overall overtime? Utah

I've already replied to a posting, and I appreciate the prompt respnse. I have another clarifying question that is a result of my conversation with my boss today. I've been told from this forum that with 35 hours one week and 48.75 hours the next on a bi-weekly pay period I should receive 8.75 hours OT on my paycheck. My company's accountant told my boss that since it was my choice to only get 35 hours the first week the 8.75 hours OT from the second week roll over to the first to give me a full 40 for both weeks and 3.75 hours OT for the pay period. I did choose to take a day off the first week. Does my decision for a day off affect the amount of OT I'm entitled to?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2007, 09:47 PM
DAW DAW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,179
Default

Not really. There are any number of possible exceptions to the overtime rules, but nothing you have said stands out as very likely, and the legal burden of proof is on the employer to show that an exception exists.

http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/whdfs23.htm

Unless specifically exempted, employees covered by the Act must receive overtime pay for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than time and one-half their regular rates of pay. ... Averaging of hours over two or more weeks is not permitted.
__________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away".
Philip K. Dick (1928-1982)

If I do not answer a publicly posted question, it is because I do not know the answer. Sending me a PM does not change that. And California is the only state whose laws I am reasonably familiar with. Sending me a PM does not change that either.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2007, 10:06 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

And for future reference, your employer is NOT obligated to allow you to work overtime. So if in some future pay period they decide to send you home early so that you don't go into overtime status, that is completely legal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-13-2007, 05:44 PM
from_mars from_mars is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Default thank you

Hey thank you for the info...very much appreciated.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
overtime after 8 hrs. or 40 hrs? Sandy Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 5 07-19-2005 01:01 PM
Required Overtime momof2 Overtime Laws 3 03-16-2005 09:11 AM
no overtime for more than 40 hrs? mcgriff01 Overtime Laws 4 01-18-2005 07:47 PM
Actuarial Study Shows CHOICE Medical Management Services Reduces Total Loss Costs for Ct Healthmarket via BizWire General Insurance 0 02-24-2004 07:21 AM
Lenders First Choice Occupies 26,000 Square Foot Office Space in Frisco Ct Healthmarket via BizWire Debt and Loans 0 06-23-2003 06:20 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming