Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Missouri Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2007, 06:43 PM
Evangeline Evangeline is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
Red face Missouri

I have been a salaried employee (average of 43 hours a week) for 12 years. My company is changing how we are paid--trying to bring us up to code I guess... My job was re-classified to an hourly position. One problem is I have 2 busy seasons that I'll work 50 hours a week, but then on the off seasons I work only 38-40 hours. Over the course of a year it all balances out to an average of 43 hours and I was very happy with a consistent paycheck. Now that I'm hourly, I'm going to have a paycheck that is like a roller coaster through the year. The weeks I'm not busy, my paycheck will be lower than I'm used to and then when I'm busy it will be higher. I've read the law and I completely understand the reasoning behind it, but it is causing hardship on me and my co-workers. Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2007, 12:40 AM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

Only that if you need a job with that pays exactly the same amount every week you'll have to look elsewhere. There are no "convenience" provisions in the law. The employer MUST pay you for the number of hours you work in the paycheck for the week that you worked them. There is no provision to allow them to "average" your hours and pay that instead.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2007, 03:03 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,688
Default

Well, there is salaried nonexempt with a fluctuating workweek pay method, but it's very hard to administer and I don't think we want to go there.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-13-2007, 03:28 PM
Evangeline Evangeline is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
Smile

Thanks for your replies. I looked up some info on the fluctuating work week theory. I forwarded it to our HR dept. (brand spanking new dept) I'm sure they're smart and know what they're doing. I just wanted to doing some checking on my own. Thank you for your help!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2007, 05:39 PM
ScottB ScottB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangeline View Post
I forwarded it to our HR dept. (brand spanking new dept) I'm sure they're smart and know what they're doing.
That is wonderful that you are confident in them.

I have seen too many folks who should know better do wrong, either out of ignorance or design. There is no way I would trust someone new to HR, even if they are smart. Now if the department is new, but the folks in it experienced, it would be different.

Now, figure out how the fluctuating work week will work for you. Odds are, your pay will be less, over the course of a year, than it would otherwise.
__________________
Senior Professional in Human Resources and Certified Staffing Professional with over 30 years experience. Any advice provided is based upon experience and education, but does not constitute legal advice.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who is affiliated with BRIDG? Missouri qacrawler Missouri Business Law 0 07-06-2006 03:03 AM
Miscellaneous Telephone Numbers: Missouri qacrawler Minnesota Court Law 0 06-27-2006 10:48 PM
Missouri Division Of Workers’ Compensation Labor Law Poster laborlaw Missouri Labor Laws 2 06-10-2005 10:36 AM
Missouri Labor Law Posters laborlaw Missouri Labor Laws 0 04-30-2005 12:26 AM
Gantt, Framer Of 1875 Missouri BOR: "This Shall Not Justify The Wearing Of Conce The Lone Weasel Small Claim Court 33 10-29-2003 04:27 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming