Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Iowa Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-16-2007, 09:48 PM
parleer parleer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Default Education Reimbursement Iowa

I am wanting to offer Education Reimbursement to a specific candiate in order to match what they are currenty receiving from the company they are levaing. I cannot afford to offer such benefit to other employees at this time. Is it legal to offer this type of benefit to one employee but not others?

Thanks, Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-16-2007, 10:40 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

Yes, it is legal for one employee to negotiate a benefit that is not available to all employees. I would make sure that you specify in writing precisely what you will and will not pay for and under what circumstances, including any paybacks you may require, and make it clear in the offer letter that this is a negotiated benefit not available under most circumstances.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-16-2007, 10:50 PM
parleer parleer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks for the quick response! Can you point me to some website or other resource where I can read up this and related matters. I found the dol.gov website but am unsure where to start. I guess what I want to know is "How could I have found this answer myself without having to ask on this forum?" Is there some legislation that discusses the freedom an employer has when offering benefits to employees?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-16-2007, 11:32 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

What it boils down to is, benefits cannot be based on a characteristic protected by law (race, religion, national origin, etc.).

For ERISA-based benefits (health insurance is an example) you can set up eligible classes of employees (ex. full time but not part time; office but not shop; corporate but not field offices; managers and up but not below, etc.) but having done so, all employees in the eligible class or classes must be offered the benefit.

In this case you are not offering an ERISA-based benefit (it could be, but in this case is not) so you can offer it to anyone you like as long as you are not basing it on a protected characteristic, which you are not.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-17-2007, 09:36 AM
parleer parleer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks so much for the information! That really clears things up.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Never rcvd 'Promised' Education reimbursement benefits from the interview process johnnyandkate Hiring and Firing 4 08-26-2006 06:08 AM
Who has to do continuing education and are there any exemptions? Massachusetts qacrawler Massachusetts Real Estate Law 0 07-04-2006 12:00 AM
Employer education reimbursement surfgeo Personal Debt 11 01-18-2006 06:13 PM
Workplace Financial Education Expands at American Express Ct Healthmarket via BizWire General Insurance 0 02-25-2004 08:11 AM
Magellan Behavioral Care of Iowa Promotes Expansion of Evidence-Based Programs Throug Ct Healthmarket via BizWire General Insurance 0 09-18-2003 11:31 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming