Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Missouri Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-01-2007, 12:28 AM
gail924 gail924 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Red face On call and compensation Missouri

I work for an in-home health agency. Each month, for a week, I have to take the after hours on-call phone (cell) from 5pm to 8am during the week and from 5pm on Friday to Monday 8am (if not a holiday).
I am on hourly pay, not a salary. I, and the other's who take the phone during the other week's of the month, do NOT get paid for this. We are told we get to take comp time equal to the time we have the after hours phone, but it never happens. We are nurses and there isnt anyone to take our place if we are gone. Is this legal?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-01-2007, 07:50 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,688
Default

On-call time is only compensable if your personal activities are severely restricted. However, you must be paid for the time you are actually on the phone or called to a site to work (I was a little confused as to whether you just provide assistance via phone or whether you actually have to go to a work site).

Private employers are not allowed to offer "comp time" in lieu of paying overtime wages to nonexempt employees. For this, you can file a claim for unpaid overtime with your state Dept. of Labor.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-01-2007, 10:22 AM
ScottB ScottB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pattymd View Post
Private employers are not allowed to offer "comp time" in lieu of paying overtime wages to nonexempt employees. For this, you can file a claim for unpaid overtime with your state Dept. of Labor.
I read it as the comp time being offered as a way of making up for the burden of having the cell phone, aside from hours actually worked. So the employer is saying that the employee can take some time off with pay at some future date, but not doing so to avoid overtime. (even though the employer is not making good on its promises). Personally, I would avoid using the term "comp time," as that would certainly be misunderstood.
__________________
Senior Professional in Human Resources and Certified Staffing Professional with over 30 years experience. Any advice provided is based upon experience and education, but does not constitute legal advice.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-02-2007, 04:12 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottB View Post
I read it as the comp time being offered as a way of making up for the burden of having the cell phone, aside from hours actually worked. So the employer is saying that the employee can take some time off with pay at some future date, but not doing so to avoid overtime. (even though the employer is not making good on its promises). Personally, I would avoid using the term "comp time," as that would certainly be misunderstood.
Could be. I was not clear about the circumstances here. If so, as long as the on-call time is not restrictive enough to be compensable, adding to your paid time off balance (which is, in effect, what would be occuring) is perfectly legal and more than the law would require.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2007, 03:31 PM
gail924 gail924 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Red face Posting reply to ScottB and Pattymd

You are right Scott. It is was suppose to be used as a way of making up for the burden of having the cell phone, aside from hours actually worked.
How it works is that we have the on-call phone so that if an attendant cannot, for some reason, take care of a scheduled client, we have to call through the list to find another attendant who can cover the shift time. If another attendant cannot fill the time at the client's, then the nurse has to go out as the attendant.
It also is used for if a client is not going to be home, has entered the hospital, etc. they or a family member can call the on-call phone to let us know that a client wont be home and we in turn notify the attendant, so that they dont make a wasted trip to the clients home.
As far as having a 'time off' bank. We dont have PTO as part of our employment.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2007, 04:09 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,688
Default

Then, I stand corrected and I also stand with ScottB.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-05-2007, 03:11 PM
gail924 gail924 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Thumbs up Thank you Scott and Patty.

I appreciate your taking the time to help me with my questions and you both have been most helpful. Thank you Scott and Patty, very much!
Sincerely,
Gail
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alabama Unemployment Compensation Labor Law Poster laborlaw Alabama Labor Laws 7 12-23-2008 09:01 AM
On Call Compensation rammagen Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 0 12-30-2006 05:42 AM
Missouri Division Of Workers’ Compensation Labor Law Poster laborlaw Missouri Labor Laws 2 06-10-2005 10:36 AM
ESIS Announces Top Ten Ways to Reduce Workers Compensation Fraud: What Every Risk Man Ct Healthmarket via BizWire General Insurance 0 02-26-2004 10:10 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming