Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Tennessee Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2006, 01:59 PM
NewtoTN NewtoTN is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2
Default Company refused 2-week notice Tennessee

I am writing on behalf of my girlfriend, trying to get some idea as to whether her former employer has broken the law. She had been a salaried employee at a major Tennesee furniture manufacturer, working as a computer programmer/analyst in their I.T. Dept. from Oct. 1, 2005 until today, Aug. 25, 2006. She had become increasingly dissatisfied with her job and recently found a new job. She tried to follow standard corporate practice, and in good faith, tendered her written 2-weeks notice of resignation, the 2 weeks to end Sept. 8. She was immediately informed that she was no longer needed, told that she would not be paid for the two weeks nor for her 4 days of leftover vacation pay, told that her insurance coverage was terminated immediately, was told to clean out her desk, and was escorted from the building. She had been (to the best of her knowledge) a good employee, and had never been disiplined or written up for anything.

Can they do this? Does she have any legal recourse? If so, who should we contact in Tennesee? Is there a State Employment Commission to handle things like this, like there was in Virginia, where we had been living? Please help us come to terms with this affront to good faith and sensibility.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2006, 02:50 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

It is neither illegal nor particularly uncommon for an employee who has given their notice to be told they need not work the notice and not to return. The employer is under no legal obligation to pay them for the unworked notice time, regardless of who decided that she would not work it. They are free to terminate her insurance immediately if that is provided for in the insurance plan, and in my experience (which is considerable) about 50% of the time, it is.

IF the vacation time has ALREADY accrued, then under TN law they must pay that out, but that is the only thing you have listed that provides her with any legal recourse, and that's only a maybe (dependent on how her company accrues vacation time). She would contact the TN DOL if that is still owed her.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2006, 02:56 PM
turbowray turbowray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,362
Default just another question

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbg
It is neither illegal nor particularly uncommon for an employee who has given their notice to be told they need not work the notice and not to return. The employer is under no legal obligation to pay them for the unworked notice time, regardless of who decided that she would not work it. They are free to terminate her insurance immediately if that is provided for in the insurance plan, and in my experience (which is considerable) about 50% of the time, it is.

IF the vacation time has ALREADY accrued, then under TN law they must pay that out, but that is the only thing you have listed that provides her with any legal recourse, and that's only a maybe (dependent on how her company accrues vacation time). She would contact the TN DOL if that is still owed her.
Does the insurance company offer cobra every time? Should they be allowed to pay the cobra and at least continue the insurance? (spendy it is though).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2006, 03:08 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

COBRA is a continuation of the already-existing coverage. It is the responsibility of the employer, not the insurance company, to provide the information, although they have up to 44 days after the last day of coverage to do so. Assuming the employer qualifies (he does if there are 20 or more employees) then unless the employee was fired for gross misconduct or was not on the insurance plan in the first place, it is required by law.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2006, 03:16 PM
turbowray turbowray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,362
Default Thank you!

Your the best CBG!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2006, 05:13 PM
NewtoTN NewtoTN is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2
Default Wow...quick response

Thank you, CBG, for your quick response. It was quite informative. The company, which shall remain nameless, apparently hasn't broken the law, but certainly did not respond with good faith, or with good business ethics. We will check into the vacation time payment. Since this is not the first questionable act they have committed during her employment, as short as it was, we will also be informing every I.T. headhunter we know about the way they treat employees who have tried to act in good faith, and have done nothing wrong except try to improve their station in life.

Once again, thanks, and have a nice day.

NewtoTN
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Company refused to pay owed commissions after I quit Jim Holtz Labor Laws 4 05-01-2006 09:48 AM
Iraq body count: my model's predictions Ignoramus13725 Marriage Law 14 09-10-2004 02:28 AM
Arch Capital Group Ltd. Reports 2004 First Quarter Results Ct Healthmarket via BizWire General Insurance 0 04-28-2004 02:20 PM
A simple model (revenge) Ignoramus20984 Marriage Law 16 09-19-2003 01:06 AM
21st Century Holding Company Reports Record Q2 Earnings of $0.69 Per Share Ct Healthmarket via BizWire Personal Debt 0 08-04-2003 04:20 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming