Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Missouri Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2006, 03:12 PM
IWC IWC is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1
Default Exempt employees, how many hours can we be forced to work? Missouri

I was just curious, is there any set amount of "overtime" an employer can require an exempt employee to work? Say 50 hours? Example, I am a warehouse manager and was hired in by our Area Manager. At the time of the private interview with him I was told that 45 hours are what is required. Fine, I had no issue with that as I generally work 45-60 hours a week anyway.
Several weeks later, that Area Manager was terminated. We have an "acting" Site Manager now that is telling me I left early a few days the previous week and has used this to write me up for corrective action. I put in my hours and work my job to the best of my ability, one of the days in question I had come in at 5 am to unload a truck that had equipment we needed badly on it. I left around 2 pm. The following day I worked 8 hours and left to pick up my son, one of the reasons I took this job was that I was told during the interview that I would work Mon-Fri. I understand that the employer can change their staffing hours.
My base question is this, how MANY hours can they force me to work as an exempt employee?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-22-2006, 05:46 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,687
Default

As many as they like.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2006, 11:04 AM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

The maximum number of hours either an exempt or non-exempt employee can be required to work in a single week is 168.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-07-2008, 12:02 PM
marck marck is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2
Default California Requirements

I've been told that California law prohibits working for periods longer than six consecutive days. Even here you need to rest for one day.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-07-2008, 12:28 PM
DAW DAW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,179
Default

That is sort of true. You are talking about CLC 551-554. There is a one day in seven rule, but there is a rule that says "Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent an accumulation of days of rest when the nature of the employment reasonably requires that the employee work seven or more consecutive days, if in each calendar month the employee receives days of rest equivalent to one day's rest in seven." Arguably the rule is more like a cannot work more then 24 of every 28 days if you look at the entire set of CA labor code.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/di...0&file=500-558
__________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away".
Philip K. Dick (1928-1982)

If I do not answer a publicly posted question, it is because I do not know the answer. Sending me a PM does not change that. And California is the only state whose laws I am reasonably familiar with. Sending me a PM does not change that either.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-07-2008, 12:58 PM
ScottB ScottB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,327
Default

Misssouri has no caps on work hours. California has some (72 hours in a week, but only for some jobs, not all). Maine won't allow anyone to work more than 80 hours of overtime in any two consecutive work weeks. That could be 40 hours this week, 120 hours next week and 40 hours the following week.

There are some industry specific limitations, some federal (truck drivers, pilots), some state specific (nurses in Maine).

And then there are the one day in seven states (few).

Unless your job is specifically laid out in law or a contract with a cap on time worked, you get to work all the time that the employer demands.
__________________
Senior Professional in Human Resources and Certified Staffing Professional with over 30 years experience. Any advice provided is based upon experience and education, but does not constitute legal advice.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-07-2008, 01:01 PM
marck marck is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2
Default 72 hours in California

Where can I find the reference for the 72 hour limit in California?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-07-2008, 01:04 PM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,687
Default

It's probably in the applicable Wage Order.
http://www.dir.ca.gov/iwc/wageorderindustries.htm
__________________
I don't respond to Private Messages unless the moderator specifically refers you to me for that purpose. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mentor Hid Defects ... stashed defective parts ... repost 22Ted Consumer Law and Fraud 0 02-15-2006 03:44 PM
Reporting for Work dm102270 Labor Laws 6 02-12-2006 02:06 AM
North Dakota MINIMUM WAGE Labor Law Poster laborlaw Small Claim Court 0 05-25-2005 02:30 PM
Tennessee CHILD LABOR LAWS Labor Law Poster laborlaw Tennessee Labor Laws 0 05-24-2005 01:35 PM
Connecticut Department Of Labor Wage And Workplace Labor Law Poster laborlaw Connecticut Labor Laws 0 05-20-2005 02:06 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming