Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Minnesota Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2006, 10:46 AM
AMiller AMiller is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2
Default Paying out unused accrued PTO to current employees in MN

I work for a small company in Minnesota. In the past, our employer stated that "I am changing my company policy to state that any unused PTO time on December 31 will be paid to you at your normal hourly rate." Since making that statement in 2004, my employer read somewhere that if an employer does that, they have to pay the time at an overtime rate. Is that true? I've spent a lot of time searching online trying to find a statute or information about paying current (not terminated) employees accrued unused PTO. Can anyone shed some light on this one?

Thanks,
Anne
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2006, 11:11 AM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

I have never heard of such a law and find it very difficult to believe that it is true. Patty?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2006, 11:50 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,687
Default

That's a bunch of hooey.

But hey, if we wants to spend his money that way, it's his business. There just isn't any law that says he must.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-2006, 12:46 PM
AMiller AMiller is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2
Default

Actually, she (my employer) verbally got rid of that policy once she read that OT would have to be paid. (We are in the process of making a written handbook.) One of the employees is asking about it again. Thanks for the information - she will be pleased to know that there is no law that substantiates this. Anne
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-2006, 03:18 PM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,687
Default

I don't know where she could have read that. Maybe a fairy tale book.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-09-2006, 03:33 PM
robb71 robb71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,721
Default

I think Pattymd has the case of the funnies today! But I agree. I've never heard of such a law either.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-09-2006, 03:41 PM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,687
Default



Seriously, though, every time I've had an employee come to me and say "The law says you must..............", I've said, "Please bring me a copy of the law or provide a link to it so I can look it up. After I've read it, I would be more than happy to discuss it with you."

They've NEVER been able to do it yet.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reporting Pay/Min Hours Worked LLayman Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 19 03-21-2007 11:44 PM
The big lie and the truth about Right-to-Work futureoftheunion Consumer Law and Fraud 4 02-21-2006 06:12 AM
Question on Illinois and exempt employees taking time out of PTO balance.. mar915 Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 1 03-30-2005 11:33 PM
Illinois exempt employees deducting from PTO balance mar915 Labor Laws 1 03-30-2005 11:28 PM
Asked to be on-call during unpaid lunch hour without pay Nancy Raut Wage & Hour Laws - Minimum Wage Laws 2 12-06-2004 08:46 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming