Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > Missouri Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-16-2006, 07:53 PM
jmpdk3 jmpdk3 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Default Scheduling Issues Missouri

Hi, I would like to know how many days/weeks in advance employers are required to post work schedules? (My 17 yr old dau works at a restaurant who posts work schedules the day before that schedule starts. Her work week runs Wed to Tues and schedules that start the next day-Wed-are posted on Tues-the day before.) I've heard that employers are required to post schedules 2 weeks in advance, thus the reason for giving two weeks notice. Is this true?

Also, are employers allowed to change employee's schedules once it has been posted on the employee bulletine board w/o the employee's conscent or notification? If the employer changes an employee's schedule, is the employer required to notify the employee of such change? Would the employee be required to work the 'unscheduled' shift if they weren't notified or had knowledge of the change? (Again, my dau's work place changes their posted schedule at will w/o notification or conscent of their employees.)

Thanks for your help.

Last edited by jmpdk3; 06-16-2006 at 07:58 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-16-2006, 08:40 PM
Marketeer Marketeer is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,028
Post

There are no laws that specify how far in advance an employer must post employee schedules. There are no laws that govern employee schedules AT ALL, except for some well-regulated professions such as airline pilots and long haul truckers. The employer does not have to ask the employee's permission to change schedule, nor does the employer have to notify the employee (although it would certainly be helpful). If the employee cannot or does not work the new schedule, the employee can be terminated.

Is it fair? Not really. It is, however, perfectly legal.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-17-2006, 02:18 PM
jmpdk3 jmpdk3 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks for the prompt answer. I appreciate your help.
I know I read two weeks notice for posting schedules somewhere but I didn't document where. I may have read it in my dau's restaurant handbook-it may be a company policy rather than a law (I hope-which means the company is breaking its own rule).
As far as I read and from the tone of this site, besides receiving pay and a few benefits, employees don't seem to have many rights. Its unfair that employers & law makers keep it this way. This needs reform. Big brother needs to watch everyone's back not just the (deleted by moderator) in charge. Employees deserve to have more rights than just pay and some benefits (if they even get any). They deserve to be treated like human beings who have a life...a family outside of their job. They deserve respect. That's my two cents.
Thanks again. I'm still going to look into this. I dislike my dau's employer (who used to be my employer) screwing over their employees like they are w/o a slap on the wrist or even a bad nights sleep.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-17-2006, 05:18 PM
Marketeer Marketeer is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,028
Post

I suspect that the two weeks you read about is a company policy as outlined in the employee handbook. Very few employee handbooks rise to the level of an enforceable contract, and almost all that I've seen include a disclaimer that states that the employer can change the policies contained therein as business needs dictate.

I disagree with your premise that employees have no rights in the workplace. All of the following laws grant employees considerable protections:

The Fair Labor Standards Act -- wages and hours, child labor. Being paid for work done.
The Equal Pay Act -- wages based on sex.
Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) -- employees over the age of 40.
Americans with Disabilities Act
The Older Worker Benefit Protection Act
Plant Closure Laws
Civil Rights Acts -- discrimination based on race, sex, religion, or national origin.
OSHA -- Basic safety issues including protection from hazardous substances and environment, and now, on a state level, even smoking and violence.
Family and Medical Leave Act -- job-protected leave for serious illnesses and bonding with newborn child.
ERISA -- retirement plans.

If your daughter wants a schedule that will be the same week in and week out, I'd suggest that she look somewhere else besides the restaurant industry. Without knowing why the schedule changes, I would point out that if your daughter calls in sick, that likely means someone else's schedule gets changed to cover her hours. That's the nature of the industry in which your daughter has chosen to work.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Missouri Division Of Workers’ Compensation Labor Law Poster laborlaw Missouri Labor Laws 2 06-10-2005 10:36 AM
Missouri Labor Law Posters laborlaw Missouri Labor Laws 0 04-30-2005 12:26 AM
Tax credit misses mark in adoptions within Missouri KL Missouri Family Law 0 08-28-2004 03:18 PM
Gantt, Framer Of 1875 Missouri BOR: "This Shall Not Justify The Wearing Of Conce The Lone Weasel Small Claim Court 33 10-29-2003 04:27 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming