Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > Maternity Leave - Pregnancy Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2005, 07:28 PM
lou lou is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Default Discrimination against workers who AREN'T preganant and DON'T have children???

(CO) The company I work for allows new mothers to return from maternity leave to a 4-day work week (32 hours) with their previous full time salary and benefits for an indefinate period of time. (some of the babies are a year old) I thought this was a great idea for non-mothers also and recently asked to join the 'parenting program.' I was told this was not an option as it would cause all employees to want the same thing. I was also told that they were on a reduced salary (I did not disclose that I know this is not true) and that they are given this benefit because a mothers time with her new child is valuable. I do not disagree, but time with a dying parent, time with grandchildren, or even time with a dog may be as valuable to an employee as time with a new baby is to a new mother. I am happy for the mothers but feel discriminated against for not being one. I appreciate all comments.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-06-2005, 07:55 PM
LConnell LConnell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,056
Default Discrimination

I understand your frustration. However, this is a legal practice. Further, I feel it is commendable.

The workplace has come a long way since the days when a woman was terminated at the time it became known that she was pregnant or, if allowed to remain employed, was not given time off to be with her child.

My personal belief is that any help we can give to any person facing a challenge, whether a new addition to a family or the death of a close family member deserves consideration. While I love dogs (as I have four of them sitting at my feet right now), I would not put spending time with a new-born child in the same category as spending time with a dog. Studies have shown that the better the relationship between a child and his/her mother, the better the long-term benefits to society.

It is sad but true that if people complain about this benefit, the employer will have no choice but to eliminate it for all persons. Instead of complaining about it, you may wish to appreciate your employer for being socially responsible. If your employer receives positive feedback, it may be more willing to consider expansion of this program or others from which you may benefit in the future.
__________________
Lillian Connell

Forum Moderator
www.laborlawtalk.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2005, 08:41 PM
lou lou is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Default

Thank you for your response. Perhaps it will help me to adjust my attitude about the situation. I have had children and was fortunate to not have to work when they were babies. I wish that all new mothers could have that opportunity. I realize and support the need for a mothers time with her children. I have recently remarried and my new husband is faced with an illness that could cut his life short. I am now feeling that time with loved ones is valuable at any time in life. I did commend my employer for the program and for being socially responsible. I told him that the program worked well and that the employees participating were happy, productive, and grateful for the opportunity given to them. I was simply asking for the same opportunity.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2005, 06:10 AM
LConnell LConnell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,056
Default Feedback

Thanks for your comments. I am sorry if I came across as harsh. My best to you to you and your family.
__________________
Lillian Connell

Forum Moderator
www.laborlawtalk.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming