![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/arti...al/235ef59068d
ff7f586256e6a001cf8dc.txt Mother failed to take advantage of SD, Iowa safe haven laws By Bret Hayworth Journal staff writer The Sioux City Journal It's supposed to work this way. A mother who finds herself in circumstances where she feels it best to give up her newborn brings the baby to a hospital. The infant is left, the mother walks out, few questions asked. That option is available in both Iowa and South Dakota hospitals, yet a young woman living in Union County, S.D., reportedly gave birth to a male baby on Feb. 2, and placed the boy -- whether alive or dead hasn't been determined -- on Feb. 3 into a trash receptacle. Since March 12 searchers have scoured a rural Jackson, Neb., landfill to find the body. Over the last half decade states have increasingly added "safe haven" laws under the rationale that keeping the baby alive trumps hectoring parents about reasons for giving up the baby. A parent who takes advantage of safe haven laws is abandoning the baby and terminating parental rights. "It certainly was heartbreaking, that the mother may not have been aware of the safe haven law," St. Luke's Regional Medical Center social case work manager Judi Wiskus said of the local case. Forty-five states now have safe haven options, generally specifying from three to 30 days as the time allowed to hand over the baby. About half the states, including Iowa and South Dakota, will not prosecute parents who relinquish unharmed infants, the National Conference of State Legislatures reports. Nebraska is one of the five states without a safe haven law. Iowa became a safe haven state in July 2001. St. Luke's explained the new measure in a December 2001 newsletter and Wiskus said employees there are well acquainted with how to respond to a drop-off situation. In the few weeks since the Union County incident, St. Luke's employees have had a refresher course. There have been "no drop-offs at this hospital," Wiskus said and she is not aware of any at other area safe havens. Since the Iowa law was enacted, four babies have been given up by parents, reported Iowa Department of Human Services spokesman Roger Munns. He said two were given up in Des Moines, with the other two in towns smaller than Des Moines. To indicate those locations more precisely, Munns said, could harm future safe haven drop-offs from parents. In South Dakota, no babies have been reported from safe havens to Child Protection Services of the Department of Social Services. However, CPS administrator Virgena Weiseler said, word was received in February of an unwanted child who was delivered to a private adoption agency. Iowa law states that infants may be relinquished at hospitals, clinics, residential care facilities and intermediate care facilities. But, said Wiskus, "I would think, knowing Sioux City, that if a baby were dropped anywhere, it would be brought to a hospital." If a mother brought her newborn to St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, explained Wiskus, the first step would be an examination of the baby by an emergency room physician. Then hospital workers would "keep the baby safe" until officials of the Iowa Department of Human Services arrive, which she said would be only a matter of hours. Wiskus explained hospital employees don't get into the reasons for the abandonment. They will ask personal history of the baby, but if the parent declines, hospital workers won't push the point. Nor will the parent be asked to identify themselves, all in line with the goal to make it a nonjudgmental situation. "We will not harass them in any way," she said. Custody is given to the Bureau of Child Protective Services of the Iowa Department of Human Services and a court hearing is held to terminate both parents' rights and to place the child for adoption. Munns said none of the parents in the four cases have changed their minds and fought to keep the babies, all of whom have been "adopted into happy families." Munns said Iowa's safe haven law is working. After the law was passed in 2001, the first safe haven drop-off came in March 2003, with the most recent Jan. 14 of this year. Since the law went into effect, the only case Munns can recall of the questionable disposal of a baby came in Buena Vista County, when body parts were found by a recycling plant worker in 2002. "If you are having a troubled pregnancy, if you don't know what to do, at least cause no harm to the child," Munns said. "And this is a way to do it." ------------------------- A good friend will come and bail you out of jail . . . but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn . . . that was fun!" -----Unknown |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FL - A SAFE HAVEN Abandoned Baby Law Saves Some, But Others Still Die | BabySafeHaven | Nebraska Family Law | 2 | 01-25-2004 11:53 AM |
| The sun never sets on Baby Safe Haven laws - Michigan eliminates sunset | BabySafeHaven | Michigan Family Law | 18 | 01-07-2004 05:03 PM |
| MA - LEGISLATORS TO PUSH FOR SAFE HAVEN - Pt 2 Herald News | BabySafeHaven | Adoption Law | 0 | 11-13-2003 03:22 PM |
| MA - Town's state reps support safe haven | BabySafeHaven | Nebraska Family Law | 0 | 11-12-2003 10:50 AM |
| States with SH laws | KL | Wyoming Family Law | 4 | 10-23-2003 09:55 AM |