Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > OHSA, State, & Federal Labor Laws Posting Requirements > New York Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2009, 05:27 PM
deardiary deardiary is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
Default What are my options. New York

So, our company has it rough times. It's on the verge of going under. A few weeks ago, I was told I was getting laid off... only never actually was.

However, things are still getting worse and worse. It was requested on Friday that we 'sit' on our paychecks for a few days, as there was currently no money to pay us. It's looking like we'll be asked to hold this weeks checks as well.

A few of us also had our hours cut. From 40 to 30, for me. However, now I'm being told by others that they intend to do this for several weeks. I'm beginning to think they are trying to force us to quit, so we won't be eligible for unemployment.

There are a number of reasons why I won't just quit. I had decided post-layoff talk to just do my best while I was there and let whatever happen, happen. I do have a back-up plan, but can't really see it through without unemployment benefits.

I know there is absolutely nothing I can do about having my hours cut, but if I quit on account of their failure to pay for time actually worked, would I be still be eligible for unemployment benefits?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-28-2009, 06:10 PM
DAW DAW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,179
Default

I am not a UI expert, particular not a NY UI expert, but quitting always reduces your chances of qetting UI. Not eliminates the possibility but reduces the possibilities. At the end of the day, you tell your story, the employer tells their story (or not) and the state then gets to decide what the state wants to do. If the state wants to turn you down, and it saves them money if they do, then they can just stop listening to you once you say "quit". Assuming this happens, you can and should appeal, but there are no sure things here, other then quitting reduces your chances of getting UI.

Your best bet, is to not quit, but to start looking for a new job now. What is your worst case? That your soon-to-be-former employer fires you for looking for a new job? The worst case if you are fired for looking for another job looks better then the best case if you quit. The state UI people are much more likely to qualify you for UI if you are fired because you are looking for a new job then if you quit for any reason.
__________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away".
Philip K. Dick (1928-1982)

If I do not answer a publicly posted question, it is because I do not know the answer. Sending me a PM does not change that. And California is the only state whose laws I am reasonably familiar with. Sending me a PM does not change that either.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:15 AM
James Stewart James Stewart is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
Default Yes, you would be eligible

You would be eligible for unemployment if you leave for "good cause".

Since your employer is flagrantly violating the law here (and in a major way), you really shouldn't have to worry.

If you want to cover your bases, report them to the Department of Labor. That will then give you protection from retaliation if they fire you, or if they try to claim you quit for some other reason.

Your employer has to pay you on a frequent and established basis. They have to pay you either every two weeks, or twice a month. If they fail to do this they are BREAKING THE LAW.

You are being taken advantage of. It sounds like you're on a sinking ship, as well.

It's a judgment call. If you can find another job, do so immediately. If you find it necessary to get onto unemployment you need to look for work anyway in order to keep your benefits.

Your company going under is no excuse to not continue to try to find work, either.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:40 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

First off, this post is over a month old and the likelihood is that the situation has been resolved.

Secondly, unless you yourself work for the NY UI division, you cannot say with absolute certainty what will happen. There could easily be factors of which we are unaware.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:08 PM
mcarson87 mcarson87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 237
Default

If the employee is not getting paid, it is quite likely that they will be granted UI upon quitting. By the way even a unemployment agency employee could not (and likely wouldn't) say for certain who will and will not be eligible for UI, despite what cbg might say.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2009, 11:49 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,716
Default

Well, no, not if someone calls and asks the question over the phone, or in an e-mail.

But ultimately, they are the ones who will make the final decision.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Motion to disqualify Alexander Karam, Dorchen Leidholdt and Sanctuary for Families fr Sam Sloan Small Claim Court 4 03-23-2007 09:23 PM
I Lost in the New York Court of Appeals Sam Sloan Consumer Law and Fraud 2 08-30-2004 08:03 AM
Petition for Leave to Appeal to New York Court of Appeals Sam Sloan Consumer Law and Fraud 0 08-23-2004 05:45 PM
Appellant's Brief in Sloan vs. Independence Party, Chaeles E. Knapp et al Sam Sloan Registration and Title 1 08-18-2004 06:38 AM
Status of proceeds from stock options fully vested before marriage but exercised dur Dave Solslang Legal Lounge 0 09-09-2003 06:24 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming