Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > HR Forum for Employers, Managers, & Human Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-05-2009, 04:11 AM
hrchance hrchance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 63
Default SIMPLE PLAN Maryland

The employer 3% match for a SIMPLE plan is 3% of the employees compensation (annual pay) not 3% of the employees contribution to the simple plan correct? Thanks i.e. the employer can match the employees contribution dollar for dollar up to 3% of the employees annual pay not 3% of the employee's contribution to the plan.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-05-2009, 04:55 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,691
Default

It's whatever the plan says it is. I'm not sure how you would expect us to know. Are you asking if there is a law regarding this question?
__________________
I don't respond to Private Messages unless the moderator specifically refers you to me for that purpose. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:02 AM
hrchance hrchance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 63
Default

Yes, the IRS regs state "in addition to the ee's salary reduction contributions, the employer is generally required to match each employee's salary reduction contribution on a dolar-for-dollar basis up to 3% bais up to 3% of the employee's compensation" which I take to mean annual salary - our agent says we can only match 3% of their contribution (we are drafting a SPD) which makes me think we need a new agent or I am not interpreting the regs properly.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:18 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,691
Default

Ah, gotcha. Sorry to assume.

If nobody else gets back to you today, I'll try to do some research on this tonight; I was out sick yesterday and I just won't have time during the work day today to do the research.
__________________
I don't respond to Private Messages unless the moderator specifically refers you to me for that purpose. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:21 AM
hrchance hrchance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 63
Default

Thanks much.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:22 AM
Cheery Cheery is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2
Default

The IRS offers these 2 options to choose from in a SIMPLE plan.

*
If you decide to make a 2% nonelective contribution, then each eligible employee must receive a contribution equal to 2% of their compensation regardless of whether the employee makes elective deferrals.

*
However, if you decide to do the dollar-for-dollar match up to 3% of pay, then only the eligible employees who have elected to make contributions will receive an employer contribution, i.e., the matching contribution.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-05-2009, 10:27 AM
Cheery Cheery is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2
Default

Also, I forgot to mention if this is important, a SIMPLE plan has lower employee contribution limits than a normal 401(k) or IRA.

For 2010, the limits have just been announced and are the same as 2009. $11,500 with a catch-up limit for people of at least age 50 of $2,500.

I found that my payroll service allowed one employee to go over the limit one year because I failed to inform them that my plan was a SIMPLE. My fault, but still a pain to fix.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-05-2009, 11:15 AM
hrchance hrchance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 63
Default

Thanks for your help and pardon the questions - I am new to this part of benefits - so if you choose to do the dollar for dollar match - you can choose to only match up to a certain amount but the amount must be the same for all employees? Can you match more for management? And you can match up to 3% of their pay? Is that what I am hearing? Thanks again,
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-05-2009, 12:03 PM
DAW DAW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,182
Default

Just a thought, but you might want to take a look at IRS publication 560, Retirement Plans for Small Business.
__________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away".
Philip K. Dick (1928-1982)

If I do not answer a publicly posted question, it is because I do not know the answer. Sending me a PM does not change that. And California is the only state whose laws I am reasonably familiar with. Sending me a PM does not change that either.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-10-2009, 05:49 AM
hrchance hrchance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 63
Default

Thanks so much. A lot of good information.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NJ State Disability for Maternity vs. Private Plan skane414 Maternity Leave - Pregnancy Laws 1 11-16-2005 12:39 PM
NJ- short term disability State Plan vs. Private Plan babyduesoon Maternity Leave - Pregnancy Laws 3 10-07-2005 01:08 PM
OT Speeding ticket, govt..and all that money...poof. Dane Metcalfe Federal and State Tax Law 37 01-28-2005 12:45 AM
N.H. Rejects Voucher Plan Guest New Hampshire Labor Laws 0 05-20-2004 07:17 AM
NYLIM Retirement Plan Services Adds New Sales Directors in Several Channels Ct Healthmarket via BizWire General Insurance 0 04-14-2004 11:11 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming