Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > Labor Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2009, 09:25 AM
Regalhank Regalhank is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
Default Job Retention After Rehab New York

Can an employer let an employee go who has been in rehab--not specifically for the rehab reason but because they need someone in the job? How long would they have to be gone? Do you have to offer some kind of job on return?
How good a case would they have if they claimed that the reason for the job loss was because they were in rehab?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2009, 11:09 AM
Morgana Morgana is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,108
Default

How many employees do you have? How long has the person been working for you?
Could this person be eligible for FMLA?
__________________
I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have.
Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:00 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,691
Default

And rehab for what?
__________________
I don't respond to Private Messages unless the moderator specifically refers you to me for that purpose. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-05-2009, 09:16 AM
Regalhank Regalhank is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
Default More Info

There are only 11 employees each with a distinct job description. This is a hypothetical situation but the "employee" is someone who has worked here over 20 years and I'd say the rehab would be for alcoholism--not a broken bone or bodily medical problem, let's just say. I'm saying the termination would not be because of the alcoholism rehab but because of company need but if said employee took this to court claiming discrimination because he/she was an alcoholic, how good would that case be?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2009, 09:37 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,691
Default

Probably not very, since being an alcoholic is not protected under the law. Since FMLA does not apply, you do not have to hold "someone's" job.
__________________
I don't respond to Private Messages unless the moderator specifically refers you to me for that purpose. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:49 PM
hollywood7 hollywood7 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
Default

Well alcholism isn't covered under fmla. But this employee has worked for your company for 20 years and know when he realizes he has a problem the company he supported for 20 years is gonna turn there back on him? I hope you don't ever get in a sitution in life where there's people like you who would do such a thing as fire someone for getting help with an addiction. maybe the other employees can do extra work untill that employee comes back from rehab. he must of been a decent employee or he wouldn't of lasted 20 years. Companies like your's is the reason this country needs union's to protect working people from losing there job's. Tell you the truth if he finds out he'll have no job when he gets out he's still better off going to rehab then working for a company like yours!!!!!!!!! do you believe in karma? you better !!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:56 PM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,691
Default

The OP asked CAN he terminate him, not SHOULD he. A company with only 11 employees can't normally do without one employee for an extended period of time.
__________________
I don't respond to Private Messages unless the moderator specifically refers you to me for that purpose. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-05-2009, 08:50 PM
hollywood7 hollywood7 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
Default

Well what do you think he was asking you if he was allowed to LET him go? And second rehab. for alcholism doesn't require a long period in rehab. And don't you think after 20 years he deserves a chance to get sober and not have to worry about his jub when he gets out? Be happy the guy didn't claim he goy hurt on the job and took off as long as he needed to get sober! There isn't one thing you can say to make what he wants to do to let this guy go to make me believe its ok! you don't know what addiction is unless you been there! and believe me theres alot of reason he could be going to rehab besides drugs. 2000000000000000 YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!! THATS THE KEY TO YOUR ANSWER! TRY HELPING SOMEONE OUT IT MIGHT MAKE YOU FEEL GOOD ABOUT YOURSELF!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-06-2009, 02:03 AM
Betty3 Betty3 is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Il.(near STL,Mo.)
Posts: 6,521
Default

hollywood7, you want to calm down a little bit, please. The poster asked a legal question & Patty gave him the correct legal answer. That's what we do here - after all this is a legal forum.
__________________
What do we live for if not to make the world less difficult for each other? George Eliot
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lost primary job but still have occasional work New York jaysee New York Labor Laws 3 04-11-2009 11:25 AM
Job Termination Question (New York) Sgrath Hiring and Firing 9 06-04-2008 10:09 AM
ny mom 5 1/2 months and starting a new job New York tatismomie15 Maternity Leave - Pregnancy Laws 1 01-01-2008 01:27 PM
Job security after long term disability NY New York Rose29 Disability Leave Laws 7 10-16-2007 09:06 AM
New York Labor Law Posters laborlaw New York Labor Laws 0 04-30-2005 12:31 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming