Labor Law Talk  
Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements

Go Back   Labor Law Talk > Employment and Labor Law > Discrimination Laws

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2009, 09:29 PM
nursejoy nursejoy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
Default RN Pregnancy discrmination in Illinois?

I am a RN and was working for homecare for a little over 3 mos. I was placed on a weight lifting restriction of 25-30 lbs originally due to a work related injury. My injury healed several days later but my doctor kept me on a restriction due to my pregnancy. He wrote a note that I was able to return to work but with a weight lifting restriction due to this pregnancy. I was then told I was unable to perform my job duties and given 30 days unpaid leave then given a letter of termination. I was told I could apply for other positions that did not have weight lifting restrictions but they could not guarentee that I would get the job. If I did receive a job offer I would be tied to that job for 12 months. I became a nurse to care for patients, not sit at a desk. I questioned them about a research study for those nurses on a temp. restriction I was told they were paid per workmans comp and my restriction was due to pregnancy, not a work related injury, and I would not qualify for the job. Do I have a discrimination case and if so how do I go about starting to fight this? Whom do I contact and what is the statute of limitations? Thanks so much.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2009, 04:25 AM
Pattymd Pattymd is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,691
Default

If there is no light duty job available, there is no light duty job available. The employer doesn't have to create one or let someone else go to provide one. You don't get special treatment just because you are pregnant. If the employer would terminate someone who was not pregnant due to temporary inability to physically do their job, they can terminate you as well. They've already gone beyond what the law requires by providing a short leave of absence. You have not worked there long enough to qualify for leave under FMLA. Sorry this is probably not what you wanted to hear.
__________________
I don't respond to Private Messages unless the moderator specifically refers you to me for that purpose. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2009, 09:34 PM
ElleMD ElleMD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 12,080
Default

It is not unusual not illegal to reserve light duty for those off for work place injuries. Since you healed and needed light duty for an unrelated reason, it was entirely legal for them to decline to place you.

It was quite generous for them to give you 30 days to find a job within your restrictions. That isn't required. You might not like the jobs within your restrictions but that isn't your employers' fault. Your own doctor is saying that you can no longer do that job safely.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pregnancy discrimination Illinois Christy75 Maternity Leave - Pregnancy Laws 1 11-02-2009 12:25 PM
Illinois divorce and pregnancy firemediclaura Divorce Law 0 05-27-2009 05:36 PM
Pregnancy Discrimination? - Illinois SSam Discrimination Laws 3 01-24-2009 09:29 AM
Pregnancy discrmination in CA - being pushed out? California ShelbyShank Discrimination Laws 4 08-03-2006 03:26 PM
CALIFORNIA "NOTICE A" PREGNANCY DISABILITY LEAVE LABOR LAW POSTER laborlaw California Labor Laws 0 05-20-2005 01:04 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© LaborLawTalk.Com 2008. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer and Conditions of Use

The LaborLawTalk.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for legal advice. The information contained on LaborLawTalk.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of LaborLawTalk.com. LaborLawTalk.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a legal expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that some of our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of LaborLawTalk.com

Topics pertain mainly to the following States:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District Of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming