Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

false allegations

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • false allegations

    [email protected]ojunk (Bulldogwaw) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
    From: [email protected] (JJGun)Newsgroups: soc.men, alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, fl.general, wi.general,milw.general
    You offer a lot of free information for dads Mr. Isaacs and you area very qualified attorney. Ken Pangborn puts ads on usenet but heisn't even an attorney.
    Ken never claimed to be a lawyer, He has a master's degree in Psychology, and is a Trial Consultant Moore. His website www.a-team.org has loads of free stuff for men.
    Ken Pangborn didn't even go to law school.
    Of course not he went to psychology school silly.
    That has yet to be proven by you or anyone else Pangborn but no
    matter it was dishonest of you to pretend you were a lawyer in this
    post that you made from your old AOL account: You wanted readers to
    believe you were an attorney or you
    would have denied it in this post that you made from that old pangk
    account of yours. You see Pangborn if you claimed that your nephew
    practiced a different field of law than you, that means that you claim
    to practice law yourself but we all know that isn't true. You aren't
    qualified to represent fathers in court by practicing law in any
    state. You lied and that psychology degree has yet to be seen by
    anyone so it's probably a lie too. :


    Subject: Re: Michael Newton shows his character
    Date: 1999/09/25
    Author: PangK <[email protected]>
    From: Michael Newton [email protected]Specifically, you refer here to your nephew's recent disbarment in DeKalb County, Georgia, for illegal activities amounting to fraud and embezzlement.Two questions, Kenny: First, when you claim, in other posts, that youwere unaware of this case because your nephew "practiced a differentfield of law"
    Yes Mikey. He did NOTHING related to the work I do. Too hard a
    concept for that last functioning brain cell of yours Mikey?
    I mean, we know you've never practiced law at all,
    WHO is WE, Mikey? WHo [sic] are you speaking for? I just love your
    "PROOF" as you have NEVER shown any.

  • #2
    false allegations

    >From: [email protected] (Robert Gautier) David Moore
    Newsgroups: soc.men, alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, misc.legal, fl.general
    Ken Pangborn didn't even go to law school. Of course not he went to psychology school silly.
    That has yet to be proven by you or anyone else Pangborn
    Sure it has and you know it.
    it was dishonest of you to pretend you were a lawyer
    Never did!
    You wanted readers tobelieve you were an attorney
    Nope.
    You lied and that psychology degree has yet to be seen byanyone so it's probably a lie too. :
    It's been seen by lots of folks Moore. And you know it and it is driving you
    nuts.

    Comment


    • #3
      false allegations

      [email protected] (Kenpangborn) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
      From: [email protected] (Robert Gautier) David MooreNewsgroups: soc.men, alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, misc.legal, fl.general
      > Ken Pangborn didn't even go to law school. > Of course not he went to psychology school silly. That has yet to be proven by you or anyone else Pangborn
      Sure it has and you know it.
      it was dishonest of you to pretend you were a lawyer
      Never did!
      Sure you did Pangborn and it was downright dishonest of you to
      pretend you were a lawyer in this post that you made from your old AOL
      account: You tried hard to get readers to believe you were an attorney
      or you would have denied it in this post that you made from that old
      pangk account of yours. You see Pangborn if you claimed that your
      nephew practiced a different field of law than you, that means that
      you claim to practice law yourself but we all know that isn't true.
      You aren't qualified to represent fathers in court by practicing law
      in any state. :


      Subject: Re: Michael Newton shows his character
      Date: 1999/09/25
      Author: PangK <[email protected]>
      From: Michael Newton [email protected]Specifically, you refer here to your nephew's recent disbarment in DeKalb County, Georgia, for illegal activities amounting to fraud and embezzlement.Two questions, Kenny: First, when you claim, in other posts, that youwere unaware of this case because your nephew "practiced a differentfield of law"
      Yes Mikey. He did NOTHING related to the work I do. Too hard a
      concept for that last functioning brain cell of yours Mikey?
      I mean, we know you've never practiced law at all,
      WHO is WE, Mikey? WHo [sic] are you speaking for? I just love your
      "PROOF" as you have NEVER shown any.

      (End of Pangborn's claim to be an attorney)

      Why would Kenneth Pangborn have challenged Newton to show proof
      that he (Pangborn) wasn't a lawyer unless he was trying to give the
      impression that he was one? Pangborn is not a lawyer and he can't
      legally represent falsely accused dads in court. Dads are better off
      hiring REAL lawyers to fight false accusations, not some punky trial
      consultant who never had a chance of passing a state bar examination.

      Comment


      • #4
        false allegations

        [email protected] (Robert Gautier) wrote in message news:<[email protected] com>...
        [email protected] (Kenpangborn) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
        From: [email protected] (Robert Gautier) David MooreNewsgroups: soc.men, alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, misc.legal, fl.general> > Ken Pangborn didn't even go to law school.> >>> Of course not he went to psychology school silly. That has yet to be proven by you or anyone else Pangborn Sure it has and you know it.
        it was dishonest of you to pretend you were a lawyer
        Never did!
        Sure you did Pangborn and it was downright dishonest of you to pretend you were a lawyer in this post that you made from your old AOL account: You tried hard to get readers to believe you were an attorney or you would have denied it in this post that you made from that old pangk account of yours. You see Pangborn if you claimed that your nephew practiced a different field of law than you, that means that you claim to practice law yourself but we all know that isn't true. You aren't qualified to represent fathers in court by practicing law in any state. : Subject: Re: Michael Newton shows his character Date: 1999/09/25 Author: PangK <[email protected]>
        From: Michael Newton [email protected]Specifically, you refer here to your nephew's recent disbarment in DeKalb County, Georgia, for illegal activities amounting to fraud and embezzlement.Two questions, Kenny: First, when you claim, in other posts, that youwere unaware of this case because your nephew "practiced a differentfield of law"
        Yes Mikey. He did NOTHING related to the work I do. Too hard a concept for that last functioning brain cell of yours Mikey?
        I mean, we know you've never practiced law at all,
        WHO is WE, Mikey? WHo [sic] are you speaking for? I just love your "PROOF" as you have NEVER shown any. (End of Pangborn's claim to be an attorney) Why would Kenneth Pangborn have challenged Newton to show proof that he (Pangborn) wasn't a lawyer unless he was trying to give the impression that he was one? Pangborn is not a lawyer and he can't legally represent falsely accused dads in court. Dads are better off hiring REAL lawyers to fight false accusations, not some punky trial consultant who never had a chance of passing a state bar examination.


        That's a good point. Pangborn was clearly trying to make us think
        he was an attorney.

        Comment

        Working...
        X