No announcement yet.

Interesting Legal case In Arizona -- Part2

This topic is closed.
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Interesting Legal case In Arizona -- Part2

    Plaintiff Schlund's verified complaint is relevant, signed under oath

    per Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 11, that he has experienced

    the extreme physical and emotional pain and suffering of the torture and

    the violation of his Constitutional Rights. That the government's

    activities of using the sophisticated electronic technologies/devices

    have hurt, injured and caused him "extreme" pain and suffering both

    physically and psychologically (Verified Complaint) including loss of

    trust in the United States government which is especially hurtful for

    depriving him of serious constitutional rights.

    He expresses in detail in his Complaint that the individual officers

    have used "improper, excessive, and unjustified force", violating his

    United States and Arizona constitutional rights. He asserts that the

    government's "improper, excessive, and unjustified force" is the "direct

    and proximate cause" of his "sustaining intermittent life-threatening


    Plaintiff Schlund, in layman terms, has expressed that during the

    torture sessions of him, he is able to utilize his innate natural senses

    to allow him to feel, smell, see, hear, touch and physically be aware of

    when his physical body is being touched and affected by an outside

    energy stimulus which has the capabilities to transfer energy, including

    sound, which has the severe result of psychological and physiological

    deterioration of his mind and body when the Government is torturing him

    in that manner.

    "The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' clear understanding that the sophisticated

    and complex electronic surveillance and other electronic [devices] can be ‘used in

    tandem with surveillance technologies' and ‘other electronic devices' or ‘other

    sophisticated electronic surveillance devices ought not be permitted in a free

    society." (Id. Koyomejian) Plaintiff Schlund alleges the United States

    has not yet become Nazi Germany, but if this is allowed by the Court to

    continue, we will be no different than that of Nazi Germany.

    Plaintiff Schlund has also detailed that during the torture sessions he suffers

    from, included however not limited to, forced sleep deprivation, pain

    and suffering throughout his body, headaches, nausea, screaming in his

    ears, violent shaking of his body and intra-cranial cavity, his eyes

    extremely ache and feel like they're going to explode, experiences

    severe diarrhea, expectorates blood and experiences blood coming from

    his anus. His teeth have cracked from the sound and electronic force

    vibration and fell apart and he has been blinded and so psychologically

    distracted due to intolerable and joint inflictions of the torture and

    surveillance distraction that his left thumb was torn off by a machine

    he was working on, causing the immediate primitive amputation of his

    thumb. This happened after Plaintiff Schlund repeatedly informed the

    government that the electronic mode they were using was blinding him

    when it was turned on. After arriving at the hospital in Phoenix,

    Arizona, the on-staff physician polished up the primitive amputation of

    his thumb by the machine, exacerbating the excruciating pain and

    suffering experienced by him as well. The aforesaid is irrefutable,

    irreparable harm to him. Plaintiff Schlund leaves here to supplement

    this motion with his affidavit.

    He voices that the extreme nature and degree of the infliction of

    torture punishment on him by the government prevents him from handling

    his normal business duties and responsibilities. The torture of

    Plaintiff Schlund was so heavy on Election Day that Plaintiff was unable

    to vote because he was prevented from voting by the use of torture.

    Plaintiff is right now being forcibly stopped by the Justice Department from

    serving on jury duty. Plaintiff was called for jury duty just the other day and

    the torture of plaintiff is forcing plaintiff under torture to not be able to

    serve on jury duty.

    It has also violated his freedoms of association and privacy and those

    associations, including speech, protected under the First Amendment, and

    in direct violation of his privileges between his attorney, doctors,

    clergy, religion, violation of equal protection under the law, violation

    of his freedom of privacy to his personal papers, effects and things

    from governmental intrusion, and violation of his rights to political

    and commercial free speech, also protected under the Constitution.

    The Supreme Court has issued prior decisions which support the issuing

    of injunctive relief for Plaintiff Schlund which involve a wide range of

    scientific and other electronic force technologies admittedly used not

    only by the United States Government, but others as well. See, Central

    Intelligence Agency v. John Cary Sims and Sidney M. Wolfe, 471 U.S. 159,

    85 L Ed. 2d 185 S.Ct. 1881 (1965).

    2. Torture and banishment allowed by the court if not stopped results

    in Plaintiff Schlund being beyond the reach of all of the protecting

    clauses of the United States Constitution, resulting in irreparable


    Irrefutably, torture is extreme punishment whether physiologically,

    psychologically or both. The government's illegal activities of

    torturing Plaintiff Schlund are done in an electronic manner unseen by

    the untrained human eye. The government's electronic torture and

    surveillance of Plaintiff Schlund is conducted in a manner in which

    Plaintiff cannot defend himself against such egregious invasions of his

    privacy or torture having the effect of placing him outside and beyond

    the reach of any of the protecting clauses of the United States

    Constitution – banishing him from such protections guaranteed

    thereunder. In other words, it strips him of all the rights which are

    given to him as a United States citizen and by God. Use of electronic

    torture and surveillance devices and systems on Plaintiff forcibly

    banishing him from the constitutional protections is a type of torture

    called banishment. Banishment is a severe form of torture recognized

    by the United States Supreme Court. United States vs. Ju Toy, 198 U.S.

    253 (1905) at pgs. 258 and 259.

    The United States in the U.S. v. Ju Toy, case held government

    activities which place a person (Plaintiff Schlund) beyond the ability

    to use his United States Constitutional protections to stop illegal or

    pretextually legal (under color of authority or office) torture or

    banishment is punishment. (Id. p. 269). It went further clarifying

    that such activity is the most severest punishment, " It is inflicted principle

    upon political offenders ………….. usually punishment on criminals whether

    real or pretended". (Id.)

    In the case before the bench, Plaintiff Schlund has been and is

    pretextually and judicially branded as a criminal and was set-up by

    sloppy, dirty, and corrupt government agents who got caught by the

    Honorable Federal Judge Lacey who held they committed "outrageous" acts

    of fabrication of evidence, witness tampering, obstruction of justice

    and other severe and repetitive acts of immoral and grossly unethical

    conduct under color of authority and office. The officials themselves

    were radical and uncivilized criminals violating federal law. They

    should have been jailed.

    The Honorable Federal Judge Lacey after acquitting plaintiff while

    standing and beating on his desk demanded that the corrupt federal

    agents be arrested for perjury and yelled that no one commits perjury in

    his court.

    See a similar recent example attached hereto as Exhibit "A", as

    self-authenticated evidence per F.R.C.P. 902(6).

    The corrupt agents nearly ended up in jail themselves on sua sponte

    contempt charges vigorously voiced on bedrock of anger by United States

    District Court Judge Lacey. The judge's clear expressions were in

    essence that the corrupt and dirty cops were the actual criminals not

    Plaintiff Schlund who was merely painted as a criminal in the bogus and

    fabricated proceedings marshaled against him by the DOJ and DEA. (Id.)

    Plaintiff Schlund is a whistle blower on dirty law enforcement

    activities anchored in corruption. Plaintiff Schlund, in reality, is a

    political witness despised by those who are steeped in government

    corruption. The DOJ, DEA and judges under their influence, in a

    concerted effort, have and continue to have, exiled or banished (to the

    extent of their influence) Plaintiff Schlund from the effective use of

    the judicial system or use of other departments and agencies of the

    state/federal government. He is subject to the species of torture

    called judicial banishment or exile. He has been placed in the status

    of a political witness and tortured as well in this fashion. United

    States vs. Ju Toy, 198 U.S. 253 (1905) at pg. 258:

    "Banishment of a citizen not merely removes him from the limits of his

    native land, but puts him beyond the reach of any of the protecting

    clauses of the Constitution. In other words, it strips him of all the

    rights which are given to a citizen. I cannot believe that Congress

    intended to provide that a citizen, simply because he belongs to an

    obnoxious race, can be deprived of all the liberty and protections which

    the Constitution guarantees; and if it did so intend, I do not believe

    that it had the power to do so."

    Plaintiff Schlund is a person of the obnoxious race or status of a

    whistle blower of corruption – a political witness against government

    corruption. Therefore, the court ordering the termination of the

    violations of Plaintiff Schlund's rights, the torturing of Schlund and

    the equal access to the use of the law, will level the playing field of

    due process, equal protection and uphold the ends of justice. U.S. v.

    Ju Toy; Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and

    Other Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and In. Re.

    the Matter of S-V, Interim Decision No. 3430 (BIA 2000); 8 C.F.R. §

    208.17(a)(2001)[defining torture], by way of example. Torture of

    political witnesses or for [other government motive] is not new and

    fully acknowledged by the judicial decisions Siderman DeBlake v.

    Republic of Argentina, 965 F. 2d 699 (9th Cir. (1992), supra; F.R.C.P.


    The result of this court not granting the requested relief will be that

    the court will be procedurally authorizing the use of torture and

    banishment and aiding/abetting in the cover-up of wireless electronic

    trespass, torture, murder and treason. 18 U.S.C. § 238 [Treason Against

    the United States]. Plaintiff Schlund's testimony as to the severity

    and extreme harm of the injuries and damages he has sustained and

    continues to sustain must be adopted as truthful, especially in light of

    no conflicting evidence to the contrary. See, Allen Scribner, 812 F 2d

    426, 430, 437 (9th Cir. 1987) ["[A] Plaintiff's testimony, standing

    alone, is sufficient to sustain a verdict."] Plaintiff Schlund's

    statements have been consistently reliable for over twenty-five (25)

    years since he was acquitted. He has passed two (2) independent lie

    detector tests, despite the proof is not admissible in court. Also, his

    Verified Complaint is construed as an affidavit, which is acknowledged

    under Rule 56(e), which can be relied upon for purposes of granting

    injunctive relief.

    As to the nature of the technology and the raw reality of the

    government torturing its citizenry, here for Plaintiff Schlund, as

    bizarre as it may seem, the reality of torture has been firmly

    recognized in the Siderman DeBlake case supra. The 9th Circuit Court

    of Appeals expended great effort to give strong and credible weight to

    the factual reality of torture of citizens by the government under its

    reliable pattern of always denying it.

    Modernly, the technology almost has no limits and it is not logical

    that the government would use old technology when it can be using the

    most updated modernized technology for "surveillance" and other purposes

    which are less costly, more effective and efficient.

    Plaintiff Schlund's Complaint avers the government needs this pretext

    of claiming he is engaged in criminal activity to justify obtaining a

    probable cause warrant in order to continuously conduct the surveillance

    activities as aforesaid. He claims the CIA/DEA utilizes "corrupt" judges

    that Plaintiff Schlund had been working with the FBI against, to obtain

    these warrants, or otherwise the government just simply conducts the

    investigation without a warrant, hoping he will commit a criminal act

    and then use that as a justification for the probable cause to seek

    legitimate warrants, while the judge turns a blind eye to the

    perpetuation of illegal surveillance and torture activities, in

    violation of his civil rights and those that associate with him.

    This is exactly what the Honorable Circuit Judge Kozinski greatly feared,

    as he expressed in his powerful dissent in the Kovomejian decision.

    However, because Koyomejian was a criminal matter, when the government

    is believed to be conducting illegal or otherwise improper

    investigations utilizing said technologies, it would be proper for the

    court to grant injunctive relief to protect Plaintiff Schlund's

    constitutional rights. Plaintiff Schlund has never been convicted of

    anything and is not guilty of any crime.

    Plaintiff Schlund is seeking injunctive relief to restrain the actual

    and threatened acts of irreparable injury which are in fact cruel and

    unusual punishment to him personally and to his constitutional rights,

    as expressed above. Even minor deprivation or violation of an

    individual's freedom of speech is always protected by injunctive relief

    against the violator. Plaintiff Schlund requests the relief as a

    preventive and protective measure to allow him to have relief from the

    torture which causes him irreparable harm, injury, and damages, as set

    forth in this motion. It is the rule, rather than the exception, that

    an injunction is not restricted to acts "contrary to law" but may also

    issue to restrain acts contrary to fairness. See, Standard Oil Co. v.

    United States, 283 U.S. 163, 75 L.Ed. 926, 51 S.Ct. 421 (1982); Swift

    and Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311, 72 L.Ed. 587, 48 S.Ct. 311

    (1981). For the court to deny this Motion and stop the lawsuits from

    going forward by the use of torture would result in the court becoming a

    co-conspirator to the cover-up of murder and the claims listed in the

    Complaint. This includes the court's participation in the overthrow of

    the United States - treason.

    Plaintiff has stressed the resulting psychological and physiological

    injury and damages, including but limited to, his feelings, sensibility,

    honor, personal reputation, deprivation of his children's love,

    affection and companionship, and the torturous interference with his

    personal guaranteed rights under the United States Constitution. All of

    these are appropriate for the court to issue an injunctive relief order

    terminating the government's torture activity causing irreparable harm

    in those regards.

    "The interests protected by an injunction against torts are not

    limited to those in property or to those of an economic character. They

    include all interests defined and discussed in the restatement of this

    subject. Thus. injunctive relief is available for the protection of

    interests of personality, even though the harm done or threatened

    consists of nothing more to injury to feelings, sensibility, or honor.

    Examples are interests in privacy, in personal reputation, and in the

    domestic relations." See, Restatement, Torts, Section 973, comment (a);

    Koyomejian and Siderman DeBlake.

    Torture is defined as a criminal act subject to relief in the World

    Court if relief cannot be obtained in the subject country (USA). If the

    court allows such violations, it gives the appearance the court is no

    different than the violator, which results in a chilling effect of the

    public trusting their own government. (See Exhibit "A", a current


    Normally, Plaintiff Schlund would seek the protections enunciated under

    criminal law enforced by the police against the violators of his

    constitutional rights, but such options are not available under the

    present circumstances. Plaintiff has tried to file 1,000's of

    complaints for the use of torture. The Justice Department, Attorney

    General John Ashcroft, Janet Reno and the Inspector Generals Office have

    refused to even answer the complaints. The Federal Rules of Civil

    Procedure, Rule 65, provides that in appropriate cases, to prevent

    irreparable harm, the court may issue an injunctive relief order in its




    Plaintiff Schlund while under torture and under the threat of

    death by the government must place the United States on notice that the

    Justice Department and courts by allowing the use of terrorist acts and

    torture against Plaintiff Schlund has resulted in injuries that

    Plaintiff will in time die from. Plaintiff Schlund under the torture by

    the government will never be able to get married or pursue happiness in

    any way. Plaintiff Schlund has been driven out of business by the

    governments use of torture and has been forced under torture to not be

    able to maintain records resulting in forcing Plaintiff Schlund under

    torture to not be able to file taxes. Anytime Plaintiff tried to file

    taxes he was punished and tortured and at times was knocked out with the

    pain from the torture of him as the government tried to stop him.

    The Government has threatened to murder Plaintiff's children

    and has tortured Plaintiff for the past 25 years and has framed

    Plaintiff for every crime they could to justify the Government's

    Nazi-like criminal conduct. The torture of Plaintiff Schlund has now so

    damaged him that in time he will no longer be able to defend himself or

    be able to work or even feed himself or his grandchildren. Social

    Security has been mostly destroyed by Plaintiffs inability under torture

    to file taxes.

    The courts issued warrants that were used to take Plaintiffs passports

    for 12 years before returning them and then took them again. The

    government used these passports to open bank accounts in Plaintiff

    Schlund's name to frame him as being involved in drugs.

    Acts which are continuous and ongoing by the Government are

    electronic intrusions and trespasses in, on and upon Plaintiff Schlund's

    home and/or vehicles for the purpose of planting new evidence every time

    Plaintiff executed his freedom of speech and redress of rights and

    complains to the Justice Department, police or the courts the torturing

    of Plaintiff is increased and new evidence against Plaintiff is again


    This process of obstruction of justice and witness

    tampering by the Government has continued each day for 25 years and may

    never stop without this court assisting with the requested relief.

    Plaintiff has repeatedly offered the Government while under the torture

    to plead guilt to any crime they wish in exchange for relief from the


    Plaintiff has confessed to every crime that he can think

    of while under torture in exchange for some relief from torture or in

    exchange for sleep.

    The government has no interest in trying or convicting

    Plaintiff for any purported crime, the government's only interest is to

    torture plaintiff to limit his freedom of speech and whistle-blowing

    activities. To imprison Plaintiff would look like the government was

    imprisoning him as a political witness. In fact Plaintiff Schlund would

    be a political prisoner of the United States. To give the illusion of

    freedom Plaintiff Schlund is allowed to appearingly remain free while in

    reality he is held prisoner electronically and controlled to a degree

    more horrible then possible in any prison without the use of the

    electronic implants used to torture Plaintiff Schlund.

    The Justice Department and the Courts to date have acted

    like Plaintiff has no rights of any kind and, in fact, have

    intentionally violated Plaintiffs rights. The Government has asserted

    by its acts and conduct Plaintiff is presumed to be guilty and,

    accordingly, the court has based its decisions on the presumption of

    guilt rather than the constitutional duty imposed on it to act on the

    constitutional presumption Plaintiff Schlund is innocent until proven

    guilty in a court of law. They have acted like Nazis. Because of this

    plaintiff has been stopped with torture from voting, owning a home or

    even being allowed to work or to run a business. Plaintiff Schlund has

    also been deprived of the exercise of his right to freedom of religion,

    of going to church and, in fact, has been tortured forcing Plaintiff out

    of church violating his Constitutional rights of freedom of religion

    and association.

    The only time that the torture was terminated was when

    Plaintiff was arrested for a contractor code violation. While he was in

    jail, all torture was stopped. Plaintiff reached the point while under

    torture that he would gladly go to jail for the rest of his life in

    exchange for not being further tortured.

    Plaintiff Schlund places the court on notice that he will

    exercise his rights to civil protest to be arrested in protest of his

    never ending torture by the Government. The Government uses electronic

    stalking, violence and terrorism and Plaintiff Schlund will use peaceful

    civil protest as his response to the Government's outrageous and

    despicable conduct and acts of evil and terrorism. Plaintiff Schlund has

    no problem with the government conducting any investigation but will no

    longer allow the government to torture him further without civilly

    protesting the Government's use of torture.

    The Government in its criminal conspiracy and paranoid

    delusions will claim that this is a threat against the Government and

    that the Government does not respond to threats. Nazis. In truth, the

    Government is the one violating Plaintiffs rights by electronic

    stalking, torture and threats and is threatening Plaintiff with further

    torture, sleep deprivation and further cruel and unusual punishment.

    Plaintiff will 90 days from the filing of this motion start

    peaceful civil protest of his torture which is being committed under the

    authority of the courts. If the U.S. Supreme Court, in its decisions,

    says it is legal to burn American flags as an expression of free speech,

    then it is legal to do other kinds of peaceful protest. Plaintiff will

    protest by burning copies of the Constitution at the Sandra Day O'Connor

    Court House in protest of his torture to get arrested and tried for his

    peaceful protest to the Government's use of torture. The Government has

    reduced the American Constitution in Plaintiff's situation into a

    worthless piece of paper with their corruption. Plaintiff will force

    the Government to hold Plaintiff in prison for the rest of his life or

    until the Government agrees to terminate the torture of Plaintiff.

    Anytime the Government tries to release Plaintiff from prison and again

    tortures Plaintiff he will again go straight to the court house and

    again burn new copies of the Constitution until he is again arrested. If

    Plaintiff is released from jail on his own recognizance or for any other

    reason he will again return to the court house and again burn new copies

    of the Constitution as soon as he is tortured again.

    As the Government fully knows, Plaintiff will be tortured as

    long as the Government has implants in his body or on his body or in

    proximity to his body capable of torturing him. Anyone with any

    electronic knowledge can design implants or other monitoring devices

    that are not capable of torture and that is all that Plaintiff Schlund

    asking for with the paranoid and delusional Government insisting that

    they have a right to use torture against him as a political witness, in

    violation of his rights.

    Let the court fully understand how evil the government has

    acted in its use of torture against Plaintiff as an electronic political

    prisoner of the United States. Plaintiff alleges that while working and

    driving from job to job in his truck he has to drive through school

    zones where children cross the street. As Plaintiff Schlund would enter

    these areas, the Government would torture Plaintiff Schlund making him

    scream in agony as the Government tried to force Plaintiff Schlund to

    run over these innocent children. These crimes were committed by the

    Government to try to force Plaintiff Schlund to possibly injure or kill

    innocent children so the government could blame Plaintiff Schlund and

    prosecute him as a horrible evil criminal. Then when Plaintiff Schlund

    would get to his intended job site the torture would be reduced by

    millions of times for the filming of Plaintiff to show that he can work

    and is in good shape.

    As soon as Plaintiff would leave the job and get on the

    freeway the Government would then again torture Plaintiff as abovesaid

    and make him scream in agony trying to force Plaintiff into an accident

    to possibly kill or injure some innocent person(s) so the Government

    could try to justify prosecuting him for the hoped for accident by the


    Plaintiff Schlund will no longer tolerate these crimes by

    the Government. He will not allow the Government to force the death of

    innocent people so the Government can target Plaintiff as abovesaid. To

    stop these crimes by the Government, Plaintiff Schlund has no other

    choice other then to force his incarceration as a political prisoner of

    the United States.

    Plaintiff alleges that if this court does not grant his

    reasonable motion for relief of torture on the grounds set forth herein,

    he may begin the expression of his constitutional rights as stated in

    this motion despite he would prefer the relief he is entitled to under

    settled law set forth herein.


    Based on the above said, Plaintiff Schlund respectfully requests the

    court to issue the appropriate injunctive relief order terminating the

    government's various types of torture of him, to maintain the status quo

    of the parties and protect his constitutional rights as follows:

    1. The court order the government to cease and desist all activities of

    every nature and kind which result in the torture of Plaintiff Schlund

    and his witnesses;

    2. The government cease and desist utilizing any type of electronic or

    other devices which emit any form of electronic force utilized by it to

    influence, control, inflict pain or suffering to any degree whatsoever,

    whether psychologically or physiologically to Plaintiff Schlund;

    3. The court order the government to cease and desist all activities of

    every nature and kind whatsoever which result or may result in the

    torture and witness tampering of Plaintiff Schlund's family, friends and

    his witnesses;

    4. That the government cease and desist all activity which directly or

    indirectly, irrespective of degree, which does or may cause pain and/or

    suffering, whether physiological or psychological to Plaintiff Schlund's

    family, friends and witnesses;

    5. The court order the removal and documentation of all implants in

    Plaintiff Schlund;

    6. The court order an independent expert knowledgeable of the nature

    and types of electronic integrated systems used by the government for

    surveillance and torture of American citizens to advise the court of the

    government's ability to torture Plaintiff Schlund electronically;

    7. That independent experts F.R.C.P. 706 and a magistrate or reference

    be ordered by the court to conduct an in-depth Evidentiary Hearing

    relating to the methods and systems of surveillance and torture of

    Plaintiff Schlund as set forth in his Complaint and Motion herewith, for

    a determination of the factual basis asserted by Plaintiff Schlund and

    findings of fact and conclusions of law, with the expert's and

    magistrate's or references' report, of findings being submitted directly

    to this court immediately upon the conclusion of the hearing;

    8. That the government and any other person or entity shall also be

    restrained, and it is the obligation of the government to notify said

    individual/entity of the injunctive order terminating the torture of

    Plaintiff Schlund;

    9. Any and all such further relief in the court's discretion that is

    fair, just and equitable under the circumstances.

    Date: _____________________ By: _____________________________

    Charles August Schlund, III

    Plaintiff Pro Per

    COPIES of this Motion mailed this

    _______ day of August, 2003 to:

    George W. Bush, an individual; and as

    President of the United States

    White House

    1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.

    Washington, D.C. 20500

    Mr. John Ashcroft

    Attorney General of the United States

    950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.

    Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

    Office of the Solicitor General

    United States of America

    Department of Justice

    950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.

    Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

    U. S. Attorney's Office

    Department of Justice

    555 Fourth Street, NW, 10th Floor

    Washington, D.C. 20001

    Office of the Inspector General

    United States of America

    Department of Justice

    950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.

    Suite 4322

    Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

    U.S. Department of Justice

    Federal Bureau of Investigation

    J. Edgar Hoover Building

    935 Pennsylvania Avenue

    Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

    United States Department of Justice

    Drug Enforcement Administration

    Department of Justice

    Mail Stop: AXS

    2401 Jefferson Davis Highway

    Arlington, Virginia 22301

    United States Department of Justice

    Drug Enforcement Administration

    P.O. Box 28128

    Washington, D.C. 20005

    U.S. Department of Homeland Security

    Washington, D.C. 20528

    By: ____________________________