On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:01:50 -0700,
<catamont-09CFDC.15015022022004@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<catamont@concentric.net> wrote:
You might also note that Mr. Edeiken has not contacted Mr. Bradburyon THREE YEARS. In that time, Bradbury has continued to defame andharass Mr. Edeiken,
How is exposing him for the liar and perjurer he is defaming him?
threaten Mr. Edeiken's wife,
How did I threaten his wife other than reporting her false advertising which
evidently got her shut down?!
post Mr. Edeiken's address, etc.
AFTER he has done such to me and only in reply!
Now Mr. Bradbury is hysterical because Mr. Edeiken has *gasp* senthim poetry in the mail.
See how you just proved you are his accomplice and how you two communicate and
plot!? Where did I state Yale F. Edeiken sent me "poetry in the mail"? How do
you know such? See how you show RICO and Yale did send a threat of violence
against me and.....
Here is all I posted:
"BTW Alien-- your hero is now engaging in acts against me which will surely get
him disbarred! Seems Yale just won't stop and yes I do have the goods on him and
yes law enforcement now has it in their files too! I am quite sure the agency
handling my complaints won't be the least bit pleased when they get statements
from my law enforcement about the latest threats and harassment your hero has
sent my way! I can't tell you more because I don't want to tip your hero off!"
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=6ach309t1a06s414qap31a393s1hhpbm41@4ax.c om&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Att: SARA for the 3rd time S_0222
Message-ID: <6ach309t1a06s414qap31a393s1hhpbm41@4ax.com>
Date: 22 Feb 2004 13:38:12 GMT
Where did I mention poetry?
BTW I will tell you this- your pimp had the stupidity to send me snail mail
on his own letterhead in a law firm's envelope etc. entirely traceable which in
part stated: "To Scotty Brad****: I wanted to remind you that Purim is
approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at this time
of year..."
The above has been turned over to law enforcement along with the rest of his
harassing intimidations and you can count on it that the people in Pennsylvania
will not be one bit pleased with the reports they will be receiving concerning
an Officer of the Court engaging in such a reprehensible manner! His latest
escapades are icing on the cake and I really don't see why he won't be disbarred
and have his license revoked this time!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=4n4u10thkq0jntg82glctakap9drrejg4n@4ax.c om&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info UPDATED LINKS S_0202
Message-ID: <4n4u10thkq0jntg82glctakap9drrejg4n@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 03:56:50 GMT
(EXCERPTED)
WHAT IS STALKING?
STALKING - pattern of words or conduct that is intended to cause and does cause
the targeted person to fear death, assault, bodily injury, or CSC upon the
person
HARASSMENT - pattern of intentional substantial and unreason- able intrusion
which causes the targeted person to suffer mental distress
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROFILE OF STALKERS
Simple Obsession Stalkers:
Characteristics include:
1 personality disorders.
2 emotional immaturity, jealousy and extreme insecurity.
3 inability to succeed in relationships by socially-accepted means.
4 dominating and intimidating victims in order to bolster own self-esteem.
TYPES OF STALKING BEHAVIOR
1 harassing telephone calls, which includes obscene calls and hang-ups
2 sending threatening mail, which is a federal felony
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^
Number 2 is going to be reported tomorrow by my Sheriff to the appropriate
agency!!
Yale F. Edeiken has engaged in: "harassing telephone calls, which includes
obscene calls" AND "sending threatening mail, which is a federal felony".
Care to deny it?
Your pal has also engaged in other criminal harassments as well and that is all
I can say for now-- why tip the bastard off!?
Isn't life wonderful?
Yes it is because you kooks keep running your mouths and giving me essential
proofs!
Sara
Tavish
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of that bastard's state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with:
"It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ***" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!!
BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse V2.1 S_0102
Message-ID: <s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 19:02:18 GMT
Yale is also a perjurer who also makes criminal death threats using subpoenaed
information:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu8996adgnu8iqg8q7ngkc@4ax.c om&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu8996adgnu8iqg8q7ngkc@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk@4ax.com>
__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
02-22-2004, 08:14 PM
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:15:36 GMT, <pski30pte6v92khg04ibsni1vufk29aetj@4ax.com>
Alien <alien@msn.net> wrote:
On 23 Feb 2004 00:31:23 GMT, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken<FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:09:23 GMT, <fvgi30puqcrdlqmbv4b5apup4okcneo93g@4ax.com>Alien <alien@msn.net> wrote:On 22 Feb 2004 23:31:44 GMT, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken<FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:(snippage for Bandwidth savings)>"BTW Alien-- your hero is now engaging in acts against me which will surely get>him disbarred!Mr. Bradbury, and I have mentioned in the past I don't believe in heroworship.I must have missed that.I understand, things get over looked in the maze of posts, not tomention that critical thinking may become muddled when posting inhaste.>Seems Yale just won't stop and yes I do have the goods on him and>yes law enforcement now has it in their files too! I am quite sure the agency>handling my complaints won't be the least bit pleased when they get statements>from my law enforcement about the latest threats and harassment your hero has>sent my way!I must again remind you of my post above.My response was to once again remind you that I don't have heros.I did not post any thing further, as all the rest was from anotherposter.
I understand that- I merely added how I replied to Sara seeing how she had
implicated herself as being a knowledgable accomplice of sorts in a federal
crime namely sending harassing and threatening communications by the United
States Parcel Service. I made no mention of what Yale was doing yet she piped up
with (and my reply shown):
<START>
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:01:50 -0700,
<catamont-09CFDC.15015022022004@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<catamont@concentric.net> wrote:
You might also note that Mr. Edeiken has not contacted Mr. Bradburyon THREE YEARS. In that time, Bradbury has continued to defame andharass Mr. Edeiken,
How is exposing him for the liar and perjurer he is defaming him?
threaten Mr. Edeiken's wife,
How did I threaten his wife other than reporting her false advertising which
evidently got her shut down?!
post Mr. Edeiken's address, etc.
AFTER he has done such to me and only in reply!
Now Mr. Bradbury is hysterical because Mr. Edeiken has *gasp* senthim poetry in the mail.
See how you just proved you are his accomplice and how you two communicate and
plot!? Where did I state Yale F. Edeiken sent me "poetry in the mail"? How do
you know such? See how you show RICO and Yale did send a threat of violence
against me and.....
Here is all I posted:
<start/quote>
"BTW Alien-- your hero is now engaging in acts against me which will surely get
him disbarred! Seems Yale just won't stop and yes I do have the goods on him and
yes law enforcement now has it in their files too! I am quite sure the agency
handling my complaints won't be the least bit pleased when they get statements
from my law enforcement about the latest threats and harassment your hero has
sent my way! I can't tell you more because I don't want to tip your hero off!"
<end/quote>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=6ach309t1a06s414qap31a393s1hhpbm41@4ax.c om&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: Att: SARA for the 3rd time S_0222
Message-ID: <6ach309t1a06s414qap31a393s1hhpbm41@4ax.com>
Date: 22 Feb 2004 13:38:12 GMT
Where did I mention poetry?
BTW I will tell you this- your pimp had the stupidity to send me snail mail
on his own letterhead in a law firm's envelope etc. entirely traceable which in
part stated: "To Scotty Brad****: I wanted to remind you that Purim is
approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at this time
of year..."
The above has been turned over to law enforcement along with the rest of his
harassing intimidations and you can count on it that the people in Pennsylvania
will not be one bit pleased with the reports they will be receiving concerning
an Officer of the Court engaging in such a reprehensible manner! His latest
escapades are icing on the cake and I really don't see why he won't be disbarred
and have his license revoked this time!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=4n4u10thkq0jntg82glctakap9drrejg4n@4ax.c om&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info UPDATED LINKS S_0202
Message-ID: <4n4u10thkq0jntg82glctakap9drrejg4n@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 03:56:50 GMT
(EXCERPTED)
WHAT IS STALKING?
STALKING - pattern of words or conduct that is intended to cause and does cause
the targeted person to fear death, assault, bodily injury, or CSC upon the
person
HARASSMENT - pattern of intentional substantial and unreason- able intrusion
which causes the targeted person to suffer mental distress
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROFILE OF STALKERS
Simple Obsession Stalkers:
Characteristics include:
1 personality disorders.
2 emotional immaturity, jealousy and extreme insecurity.
3 inability to succeed in relationships by socially-accepted means.
4 dominating and intimidating victims in order to bolster own self-esteem.
TYPES OF STALKING BEHAVIOR
1 harassing telephone calls, which includes obscene calls and hang-ups
2 sending threatening mail, which is a federal felony
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^
Number 2 is going to be reported tomorrow by my Sheriff to the appropriate
agency!!
Yale F. Edeiken has engaged in: "harassing telephone calls, which includes
obscene calls" AND "sending threatening mail, which is a federal felony".
Care to deny it?
Your pal has also engaged in other criminal harassments as well and that is all
I can say for now-- why tip the bastard off!?
Isn't life wonderful?
Yes it is because you kooks keep running your mouths and giving me essential
proofs!
Sara
<STOP>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=n0di305jhh81fk79u89mthg8lkd45r3h6f@4ax.c om&lr=&hl=en
-Subject: Sara Salzman Proves She is an Accomplice to Yale!..
-Message-ID: <n0di305jhh81fk79u89mthg8lkd45r3h6f@4ax.com>
-Date: 22 Feb 2004 23:31:44 GMT
All of the above as addressed toward Sara Salzman and NOT you!
Which I have answered with:http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=6ach309t1a06s414qap31a393s1hhpbm41@4ax.c om&lr=&hl=enSubject: Re: Att: SARA for the 3rd time S_0222Message-ID: <6ach309t1a06s414qap31a393s1hhpbm41@4ax.com>Date: 22 Feb 2004 13:38:12 GMT
Tavish
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
(Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d.225691@newshog.newsread.c om&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <yawen@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.225691@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Brad**** <rdoc_tavish@my-deja.cpm, tavish58@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioip5nbd61u0j3nr47fn@4ax.com...
[...]
Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Compare what Yale said on August 20, 2001 concerning two law firms attitudes
toward his presence with his own words: "they were dealing with someone who was
"mentally unstable" (their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their
description) who they wanted to go away as quckly as possible" to this which was
posted July 4, 2000: "Tubby has no respect from the legal community and as a
whole they wish he'd just waddle away."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
From: SoloPost05@nym.alias.net
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <20000704143439.5399.qmail@nym.alias.net>
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of that bastard's state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with:
"It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ***" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!!
BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse V2.1 S_0102
Message-ID: <s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 19:02:18 GMT
Yale is also a perjurer who also makes criminal death threats using subpoenaed
information:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu8996adgnu8iqg8q7ngkc@4ax.c om&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu8996adgnu8iqg8q7ngkc@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk@4ax.com>
__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Sara Salzman
02-23-2004, 05:29 AM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article <3rui30lts3c5ibc0um6rcgj3c73f2fd5p4@4ax.com>,
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:15:36 GMT, <pski30pte6v92khg04ibsni1vufk29aetj@4ax.com> Alien <alien@msn.net> wrote:On 23 Feb 2004 00:31:23 GMT, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken<FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:09:23 GMT,<fvgi30puqcrdlqmbv4b5apup4okcneo93g@4ax.com>Alien <alien@msn.net> wrote:>On 22 Feb 2004 23:31:44 GMT, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken><FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:>(snippage for Bandwidth savings)>>>"BTW Alien-- your hero is now engaging in acts against me which>>will surely get>>him disbarred!>>Mr. Bradbury, and I have mentioned in the past I don't believe>in hero worship.I must have missed that.I understand, things get over looked in the maze of posts, not tomention that critical thinking may become muddled when posting inhaste.>>Seems Yale just won't stop and yes I do have the goods on him>>and yes law enforcement now has it in their files too! I am>>quite sure the agency>>handling my complaints won't be the least bit pleased when they>>get statements>>from my law enforcement about the latest threats and harassment>>your hero has>>sent my way!>>I must again remind you of my post above.My response was to once again remind you that I don't have heros.I did not post any thing further, as all the rest was from anotherposter. I understand that- I merely added how I replied to Sara seeing how she had implicated herself as being a knowledgable accomplice of sorts in a federal crime namely sending harassing and threatening communications by the United States Parcel Service.
So, knowing --after the fact-- that Yale sent you a LETTER makes me
an accomplice?
And since when is sending poetry through the mail harassing and
threatening?
I made no mention of what Yale was doing yet she piped up with (and my reply shown):
Yep. I know Yale saent you a POEM in the mail.
See how you show RICO and Yale did send a threat of violence against me and.....
Let's ask all those lawyers you cross-posted to: If Yale sends
Bradbury a LETTER with a poem in it, and I know about it after the
fact, does that equal RICO?
part stated: "To Scotty Brad****: I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at this time of year..."
By the way, Yale also sent me this in response to your moronic
ravings:
"Note the dishonest editing, so typical of Brad****, which alters
the
meaning of the message. It is clear to any literate or intelligent
person (two groups to which Brad**** has never belonged) that there
is no threat of violence or other illegal action whatsoever. I will
walk into any American court at any time and happily expose Brad****
as an obnoxious lying criminal who is a hopeless crybaby when his
victims fight back. I will proudly admit that I sent him the
following note and, as long as there is a Constitution in the United
States, I expect that, when he he stops laughing at Brad****, the
judge's reaction will to be towarn the Morbid Obesity that filing
false reports with the police is a crime:
"I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people
will play nasty tricks on scum like you at that time of the year.
Take care and, most important, keep that blood pressure in check. We
wouldn't want you to have a stroke. Unless, of course, we can watch
and laugh.
"Speaking of laughing we thought you would get a chuckle out of
this:
When you listen to Bradbury bellow
You might think he's a very brave fellow
But we all know
That it's easy to show
That his belly's a deep shade of yellow."
He has, of course, proved that once more."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Joebruno
02-23-2004, 12:27 PM
Sara Salzman <catamont@concentric.net> wrote in message news:<catamont-800D49.06292523022004@news-60.giganews.com>... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <3rui30lts3c5ibc0um6rcgj3c73f2fd5p4@4ax.com>, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:15:36 GMT, <pski30pte6v92khg04ibsni1vufk29aetj@4ax.com> Alien <alien@msn.net> wrote:On 23 Feb 2004 00:31:23 GMT, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken<FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:>On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:09:23 GMT,><fvgi30puqcrdlqmbv4b5apup4okcneo93g@4ax.com>>Alien <alien@msn.net> wrote:>>>On 22 Feb 2004 23:31:44 GMT, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken>><FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:>>(snippage for Bandwidth savings)>>>>>"BTW Alien-- your hero is now engaging in acts against me which>>>will surely get>>>him disbarred!>>>>Mr. Bradbury, and I have mentioned in the past I don't believe>>in hero worship.>>I must have missed that.I understand, things get over looked in the maze of posts, not tomention that critical thinking may become muddled when posting inhaste.>>>Seems Yale just won't stop and yes I do have the goods on him>>>and yes law enforcement now has it in their files too! I am>>>quite sure the agency>>>handling my complaints won't be the least bit pleased when they>>>get statements>>>from my law enforcement about the latest threats and harassment>>>your hero has>>>sent my way!>>>>I must again remind you of my post above.My response was to once again remind you that I don't have heros.I did not post any thing further, as all the rest was from anotherposter. I understand that- I merely added how I replied to Sara seeing how she had implicated herself as being a knowledgable accomplice of sorts in a federal crime namely sending harassing and threatening communications by the United States Parcel Service. So, knowing --after the fact-- that Yale sent you a LETTER makes me an accomplice? And since when is sending poetry through the mail harassing and threatening? I made no mention of what Yale was doing yet she piped up with (and my reply shown): Yep. I know Yale saent you a POEM in the mail. See how you show RICO and Yale did send a threat of violence against me and..... Let's ask all those lawyers you cross-posted to: If Yale sends Bradbury a LETTER with a poem in it, and I know about it after the fact, does that equal RICO? part stated: "To Scotty Brad****: I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at this time of year..." By the way, Yale also sent me this in response to your moronic ravings: "Note the dishonest editing, so typical of Brad****, which alters the meaning of the message. It is clear to any literate or intelligent person (two groups to which Brad**** has never belonged) that there is no threat of violence or other illegal action whatsoever. I will walk into any American court at any time and happily expose Brad**** as an obnoxious lying criminal who is a hopeless crybaby when his victims fight back. I will proudly admit that I sent him the following note and, as long as there is a Constitution in the United States, I expect that, when he he stops laughing at Brad****, the judge's reaction will to be towarn the Morbid Obesity that filing false reports with the police is a crime: "I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at that time of the year. Take care and, most important, keep that blood pressure in check. We wouldn't want you to have a stroke. Unless, of course, we can watch and laugh. "Speaking of laughing we thought you would get a chuckle out of this: When you listen to Bradbury bellow You might think he's a very brave fellow But we all know That it's easy to show That his belly's a deep shade of yellow." He has, of course, proved that once more."
Judge Bruno: Sara and Yale, I find you guilty on all counts. I
sentence both of you to 10 lashes with a wet noodle. (You can keep all
your clothes on)
Sara Salzman
02-23-2004, 03:38 PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article <bf3896a1.0402231227.376584@posting.google.com>,
bruno@indystart.com (Joebruno) wrote:
Sara Salzman <catamont@concentric.net> wrote in message news:<catamont-800D49.06292523022004@news-60.giganews.com>... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <3rui30lts3c5ibc0um6rcgj3c73f2fd5p4@4ax.com>, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:15:36 GMT, <pski30pte6v92khg04ibsni1vufk29aetj@4ax.com> Alien <alien@msn.net> wrote: >On 23 Feb 2004 00:31:23 GMT, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken ><FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote: > >>On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:09:23 GMT, >><fvgi30puqcrdlqmbv4b5apup4okcneo93g@4ax.com> >>Alien <alien@msn.net> wrote: >> >>>On 22 Feb 2004 23:31:44 GMT, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken >>><FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote: >>>(snippage for Bandwidth savings) >>> >>>>"BTW Alien-- your hero is now engaging in acts against me >>>>which will surely get >>>>him disbarred! >>> >>>Mr. Bradbury, and I have mentioned in the past I don't >>>believe in hero worship. >> >>I must have missed that. > >I understand, things get over looked in the maze of posts, not >to mention that critical thinking may become muddled when >posting in haste. > >>>>Seems Yale just won't stop and yes I do have the goods on >>>>him and yes law enforcement now has it in their files too! >>>>I am quite sure the agency >>>>handling my complaints won't be the least bit pleased when >>>>they get statements >>>>from my law enforcement about the latest threats and >>>>harassment your hero has >>>>sent my way! >>> >>>I must again remind you of my post above. > >My response was to once again remind you that I don't have >heros. I did not post any thing further, as all the rest was >from another poster. I understand that- I merely added how I replied to Sara seeing how she had implicated herself as being a knowledgable accomplice of sorts in a federal crime namely sending harassing and threatening communications by the United States Parcel Service. So, knowing --after the fact-- that Yale sent you a LETTER makes me an accomplice? And since when is sending poetry through the mail harassing and threatening? I made no mention of what Yale was doing yet she piped up with (and my reply shown): Yep. I know Yale sent you a POEM in the mail. See how you show RICO and Yale did send a threat of violence against me and..... Let's ask all those lawyers you cross-posted to: If Yale sends Bradbury a LETTER with a poem in it, and I know about it after the fact, does that equal RICO? part stated: "To Scotty Brad****: I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at this time of year..." By the way, Yale also sent me this in response to your moronic ravings: "Note the dishonest editing, so typical of Brad****, which alters the meaning of the message. It is clear to any literate or intelligent person (two groups to which Brad**** has never belonged) that there is no threat of violence or other illegal action whatsoever. I will walk into any American court at any time and happily expose Brad**** as an obnoxious lying criminal who is a hopeless crybaby when his victims fight back. I will proudly admit that I sent him the following note and, as long as there is a Constitution in the United States, I expect that, when he he stops laughing at Brad****, the judge's reaction will to be towarn the Morbid Obesity that filing false reports with the police is a crime: "I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at that time of the year. Take care and, most important, keep that blood pressure in check. We wouldn't want you to have a stroke. Unless, of course, we can watch and laugh. "Speaking of laughing we thought you would get a chuckle out of this: When you listen to Bradbury bellow You might think he's a very brave fellow But we all know That it's easy to show That his belly's a deep shade of yellow." He has, of course, proved that once more." Judge Bruno: Sara and Yale, I find you guilty on all counts. I sentence both of you to 10 lashes with a wet noodle. (You can keep all your clothes on)
That's more than Bradbury's Sheriff sentenced us to! He thought it
was pretty hysterical that Bradbury wanted to file charges against
Yale for sending him a letter!
As for RICO, he's STILL giggling about that.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
02-23-2004, 04:49 PM
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0700,
<catamont-EF8F1A.16385523022004@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<catamont@concentric.net> wrote:
Judge Bruno: Sara and Yale, I find you guilty on all counts. I sentence both of you to 10 lashes with a wet noodle. (You can keep all your clothes on)That's more than Bradbury's Sheriff sentenced us to! He thought itwas pretty hysterical that Bradbury wanted to file charges againstYale for sending him a letter!
You wish! The implied threat was the issue!
As for RICO, he's STILL giggling about that.
Never mentioned it to him thus once again you are proven to be a fat stupid
lying pig!
Looks like someone is getting paranoid and attempting some damage control!
Sara
Tavish
__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Sara Salzman
02-23-2004, 06:04 PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article <cq7l30tdl1un7nfs0i94gp6cekgn9275i7@4ax.com>,
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0700, <catamont-EF8F1A.16385523022004@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman <catamont@concentric.net> wrote: Judge Bruno: Sara and Yale, I find you guilty on all counts. I sentence both of you to 10 lashes with a wet noodle. (You can keep all your clothes on)That's more than Bradbury's Sheriff sentenced us to! He thought itwas pretty hysterical that Bradbury wanted to file charges againstYale for sending him a letter! You wish! The implied threat was the issue!
Except there was no implied threat. In fact, the ONLY reason yale
sent me copies of the letters he sent you was to m ake sure you
didn't try to LIE about them, as you're now doing.
Sorry, Mr. Bradbury. You've been caught lying again, and law
enforcement isn't doing ANYTHING to Yale.
When the Sheriff told you the case was being transferred to the State
AG's office, he meant MY case, not YOURS.
Try again.
Sara
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Sara Salzman
02-23-2004, 09:41 PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article <n7jl301m9tfu4fcr0sf7luqo15bidshmmq@4ax.com>,
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:04:03 -0700, <catamont-392781.19040323022004@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman <catamont@concentric.net> wrote:In article <cq7l30tdl1un7nfs0i94gp6cekgn9275i7@4ax.com>, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0700, <catamont-EF8F1A.16385523022004@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman <catamont@concentric.net> wrote: >> Judge Bruno: Sara and Yale, I find you guilty on all counts. >> I sentence both of you to 10 lashes with a wet noodle. (You >> can keep all your clothes on) > >That's more than Bradbury's Sheriff sentenced us to! He thought >it was pretty hysterical that Bradbury wanted to file charges >against Yale for sending him a letter! You wish! The implied threat was the issue!Except there was no implied threat. What do you call this? "To Scotty Brad****: I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at this time of year..."
I call it a statement of fact. 1) Purim is approaching. 2) Some
people play tricks on each other at Purim."
I seem to recall that Yale submitted this in his failed lawsuit against me: 55. Said threats were intended and designed to alarm, harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon Plaintiff and that such damages actually occurred. 56. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's pleasures.
There's quite a difference between sending a letter that tells you
when Purim is, and making statements about "standing behind" someone
with a loaded gun. There is a great distance between someone sending
you a letter, and someone calling in a bomb threat at an women's
health clinic and blaming it on Yale.
What was the message's intent? What is the motive of Yale sending me numerous insulting letters via the United States Parcel Service other than to do what he accused me of above!?
I believe Yale may be trying to keep things between the TWO of you
instead of your slandering him on Usenet. Yale has no business whatsoever to be sending me such insulting mail and for a fact he is getting reported to people who take seriously the conduct of attorneys in his state! I don't think they will be so cavalier about his mailings and his obvious intent!
You've been yammering about this for years: "I'm gonna get yale
disbarred, I'm gonna get yale arrested, law enforcement takes me
really seriously." It's all a fantasy, Mr Bradbury. No one in law
enforcement thinks you're a sane human being. No one at the FBI
believed a word you said. You couldn't even get Montel Williams to
care about your pathetic story.
In fact, the ONLY reason yale sent me copies of the letters hesent you was to m ake sure you didn't try to LIE about them, asyou're now doing. Poor dodge and how did I lie!? I quoted the threat and you're in denial as usual!
As YOU love to howl, you quoted "OUT OF CONTEXT." I added the
complete quote.
Sorry, Mr. Bradbury. You've been caught lying again, You're the one caught lying and more than once in this post!and law enforcement isn't doing ANYTHING to Yale. That is what you want to believe!
Nope. That is what LAW ENFORCEMENT told me.
When the Sheriff told you the case was being transferred to theState AG's office, He told me no such thing! Care to show where I made such a claim you lying pig?
I never said you said it, Asshole. I said HE said it. So you are now
calling Sheriff Burger a LIAR?! He told me quite clearly.
he meant MY case, not YOURS. Another lie from the fat pig. The Sheriff told me to my face last Friday that it was a Sgt Lou Soucey of the State Attorney General's office who contacted them and not the other way around!
That's very funny. Sheriff Burger gave ME Lou Soucy's name and told
me that HIS OWN sargeant called Mr. Soucy.
Neither agency considers any of my activity as being criminal and once again- the next time one of your thugs posts where I live then I will post where you and Yale live!! YOU CAN COUNT ON IT YOU STUPID LYING PIG!!
And I will continue to quote your own words back at you.
It is going to be an immense satisfaction to know I was the one who gets Edeiken disbarred and his license revoked! I haven't mentioned the other forms of harassment that mentally disturbed bastard is waging against me either BUT that will surely be more icing on the cake
Dream on. Dream on.
You and Yale are quite a pair!Try again.Sara I don't need to try again you fat disgusting lying pig! Now return to your mire and wallow in it!
FORGED ALTERED CRAP DELETED
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
02-24-2004, 05:04 AM
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:41:23 -0700,
<catamont-F2E756.22412323022004@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<catamont@concentric.net> wrote:
"To Scotty Brad****: I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at this time of year..."I call it a statement of fact. 1) Purim is approaching. 2) Somepeople play tricks on each other at Purim."
I am not a Jew and you know it and Yale knows it! The letter was meant to be a
threat and harassment and nothing more! Keep trying to do damage control you fat
slob because you only show how you Jooos haven't changed your evil devilish
designs in 2000 years!
Yale F. Edeiken has no business whatsoever to be sending me anything! The fact
he keeps "bothering" me proves he has mental problems just as you have mental
problems and as Yale even said in his own words:
(Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d.225691@newshog.newsread.c om&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <yawen@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.225691@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Brad**** <rdoc_tavish@my-deja.cpm, tavish58@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioip5nbd61u0j3nr47fn@4ax.com...
[...]
Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
--Devilish Satanic Children of the Devil and Anti-Christs Identified--
CHILDREN OF THE DEVIL (BELIAL) IDENTIFIED:
John 8:
42 Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came
from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me.
43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I
say.
44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's
desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for
there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is
a liar and the father of lies.
45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!
46 Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don't
you believe me?
47 He who belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that
you do not belong to God."
48 The Jews answered him, "Aren't we right in saying that you are a Samaritan
and demon-possessed?"
49 "I am not possessed by a demon," said Jesus, "but I honor my Father and you
dishonor me..
ANTI-CHRISTS IDENTIFIED:
1 John 2: 18 "Young children, it is the last hour, and, just as you have heard
that antichrist is coming, even now there have come to be many antichrists."
1 John 2: 22,23 "Who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that Jesus is
the Christ [or Messiah]? These things I write you about those who are trying to
mislead you!"
1 John 4: 2,3 "You gain knowledge of the inspired expression from God by this:
Every inspired expression that confesses Jesus Christ as having come in the
flesh originates with God, but every inspired expression that does not confess
Jesus does not originate with God, Furthermore this is the antichrist's inspired
expression which you have heard was coming, and now it is already in the world."
2 John 7,10,11 "For many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not
confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the
antichrist. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, never
receive him into your homes or say a greeting to him. For he that says a
greeting to him is a sharer in his wicked works."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Having any sympathy for the anti-Christ offspring of Belial (aka Lucifer) is
having SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL (who is their proud father who inspires them)-
which is at its core demonic and un-Christian!
Judges 20:13 "Now therefore deliver us the men, the children of Belial, which
are in Gibeah, that we may put them to death, and put away evil from Israel."
2 Corinthians 6:15 "What harmony is there between Christ and Belial? What does
a believer have in common with an unbeliever?"
http://www.belial.org/enbib/whois.htm (Archived locally as: belial_whois)
"...the ruler of all these newly-made demons was the Prince of Evil, known as
(among other things) Satan, Lucifer, Leviathan and Belial. The fallen angels,
who earlier had worked hard for God, became pure, independent and the foremost
enemies of the Christians."
Tavish
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5rhktv483m9oofgqt8goir93o4pm08ht49%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: 3 Major Jewish Organizations Engage in Holocaust Denial...
Message-ID: <5rhktv483m9oofgqt8goir93o4pm08ht49@4ax.com>
Date: 12 Dec 2003 22:57:48 GMT
If Jews are allowed to call a historic event a "Holocaust" based on Jews being
tortured, imprisoned, and executed by Nazis then why can't Christians claim Jews
had "Holocausts" against non-Jews/Christians seeing how the 1st Century
Pharisees and the 20th Century Jewish led Bolshevists tortured, imprisoned, and
executed Christians/non-Jews. Jews also deny these other "Holocausts" so going
by their standards they are "Holocaust Deniers" and should be prosecuted for
Holocaust Denial"and "Minimalizing the Holocaust[s])" as well!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=1i7810p7itigphaaq2aogggv9r7mjlgeo4@4ax.c om&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Post-Soviet Religion (What Communists did to Christians) V2.0a S_0125
Message-ID: <1i7810p7itigphaaq2aogggv9r7mjlgeo4@4ax.com>
Date: 25 Jan 2004 19:53:30 GMT
__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Sara Salzman
02-24-2004, 05:13 AM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article <epim305avqa9tauh1vdl7uu6t719t8gfbg@4ax.com>,
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:41:23 -0700, <catamont-F2E756.22412323022004@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman <catamont@concentric.net> wrote: "To Scotty Brad****: I wanted to remind you that Purim is approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you at this time of year..."I call it a statement of fact. 1) Purim is approaching. 2) Somepeople play tricks on each other at Purim." I am not a Jew and you know it and Yale knows it!
Well, of course, everyone knows that. No one ever said you were a
Jew.
The letter was meant to be a threat and harassment and nothing more! Keep trying to do damage control you fat slob because you only show how you Jooos haven't changed your evil devilish designs in 2000 years!
No damage control, Mr. Bradbury. A strane little thing called facts.
You might try them sometime.
Yale F. Edeiken has no business whatsoever to be sending me anything!
And you have no business posting his address. Or, for that matter,
mine.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken
02-24-2004, 05:21 AM
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 06:13:00 -0700,
<catamont-8B0208.06130024022004@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<catamont@concentric.net> wrote:In article <epim305avqa9tauh1vdl7uu6t719t8gfbg@4ax.com>, Dedicated to Yale F. Edeiken <FYI@NO-REPLIES-PLEASE.NET> wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:41:23 -0700, <catamont-F2E756.22412323022004@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman <catamont@concentric.net> wrote:> "To Scotty Brad****: I wanted to remind you that Purim is> approaching. Some people will play nasty tricks on scum like you> at this time of year..."I call it a statement of fact. 1) Purim is approaching. 2) Somepeople play tricks on each other at Purim." I am not a Jew and you know it and Yale knows it!Well, of course, everyone knows that. No one ever said you were aJew. The letter was meant to be a threat and harassment and nothing more! Keep trying to do damage control you fat slob because you only show how you Jooos haven't changed your evil devilish designs in 2000 years!No damage control, Mr. Bradbury. A strane little thing called facts.You might try them sometime.
I always do0 BUT you two don';t and for a fact you two perjured yourselves!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu8996adgnu8iqg8q7ngkc@4ax.c om&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu8996adgnu8iqg8q7ngkc@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
Yale F. Edeiken has no business whatsoever to be sending me anything!And you have no business posting his address. Or, for that matter,mine.
Oh yes I do! Your thugs keep posting where I live and they only know so because
of Yale and YOU! As long as where I live gets posted then I will post where the
two ****s live who made my address etc. known in the first place and you can
count on it you fat stupid pig!
Tavish
__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Complete Labor
Law Poster for $24.95 from www.LaborLawCenter.com,
includes State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements