In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Barney Fife wrote
in message <5q9f1090lvjjnrbuu2sb7t7bacl5tmak12@4ax.com>:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:24:26 -0500,<JsJRb.4879$qU3.341958@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null>wrote:
"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in messagenews:d9ne10hmhv2q59aclejau6n6nub8kn8a7g@4ax .com...
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:56:14 -0500, <OKwRb.4564$qU3.256662@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"<test@dev.null> wrote:
>"Barney Fife" <barney_fife@mayberry01net> wrote in message >news:coqc10thonvmdmddapmbg1g84k3up4iub6@4ax.com...
>> You certainly seem to know a lot about where I live and about my >> residence and you know what that is a sign of don't you?
>Yeah, making notes of the guy who has been harassing them.
How have I been harassing them?
Do pay attention.
That is not an answer. How have I been harassing them? You made the accusaytionyou lying son of a ***** so offer examples and realm proof! You are good atmaking accusations and dodging issues.
Like the issue of my $10k? Have you got it or not?
>And remember, you invited them to your town.
A LIE!! Show any document where I ever invited Patrick Humphrey to come to my town or for that fact show where I "invited" Sara Salzman to come to my town and NO- this was not an "invitation" in the least bit:
Sure looks like one to me.
I hardly think enouraging liars and perjurers to ahve the failed lawsuit againstme re-filed is an invitation and note they haven't done and for a fact the lyingbastard who lost his apeal because of his DISMISSED lawsuit against me hasn'tbeen posting in USENET since!
Of course, blubberbury can't understand that one cannot re-file a
lawsuit that one didn't file to begin with...
I wonder why? As thois archive more thanadequatelu proves I was very willing for the whole lawsuit to go back to courtand proceed to square one! care to deny I posted this way back then?
Why would you want a lawsuit you claim to have one go back to court?
IOW I am not the coward. I am not the one who high tailed and has to use proxiesto speak through such as Yaleis obviously doing now! Tell him I really wish hjewould re-file his perjurious lawsuit in my county at my courthouse and we willgo through it one accusation right after another in front of a judge and a juryof my peers.Care to deny the following is filled with perjury and fabricated evidence?
Yep.
<snip fatboy citing zirself in support of zir delusions>
I made no invitation and I did NOT mention Patrick at all!
And it's the USA, so he can't possibly go to your town.
See how deceitful you are! Did I say he can't come to my town!? NO!Have I invited him to come tomy town? NO!!! Have I invited him to stalk me,intrude ikn my life and to take pictures of my residence? NO!!!
Has he done so? NO!!!
R3emember Patrick Keenan- a lot of people may be reading this post today,tomorrow and in the future as an archived posts and I know some of my posts arenow being feartured at someweb sites as examples of how people like you andyours operate.
Not that you can actually give an URL to any such site, but it looks
good as long as you forget your penchant for lying...
If you all can'tbe honest in these trivial and obvious mattersthen why should YOUR words be taken seriously as reagrds to historical eventssuch as WW II and the "Holocaust"?
Patrick's words about the Holocaust don't need to be taken seriously.
Only those of the generations of historians who have documented the
facts of the matter.
I don't believe one damned things ypour palspost regarding Nazi atrocities! WHY? I know how they make up lies to prove theirpoint or to further their agenda! Here is one of your fellow nitwits exposinghimself for what he is:
<snip irrelevant personal attack of the type fatboy never uses>
>They said they were coming; You left town.
I was out of town before they showed up unannounced!
I seem to recall postings announcing their imminent arrival.
Seem to recall?
Yes -- I *do* recall.
It doesn't matter!
It does to your lie that their visit was unannounced. "If you can't
be honest in these trivial and obvious matters then why should YOUR
words be taken seriously?"
My presence wasn't required for the lawsuitto be re-filed BUT I would be very glad to make my appearence in court shouldthey be bold enough to do so!
They can't refile what they didn't file to begin with, blubberbury.
For the lawsuit to be refiled-
Why would it be re-filed if you had "won"?
It was DISMISSED in my favor and most people claim that is winning but liars andlosers lik,e you claim it was dismissd on a technicality and that I didn'twin--sonow I say- wekk then get Yale to re-file and we will all see who wins forsure hands down!
No, most people don't claim that. Only you, fatboy.
which was the ONLY reason I gave for Yale and Sara Salzamn to come to my town did not require my physical presence to do such BUT I would be more than happy to appear in court should they wish to have it re-filed!!!
So how would you know in advance what they were there for?
I didn't know in advance you fool! They blabbed later and I then stated the ONLYpurpose was for the lawuist to be re-filed not to hear a fat pig ***** rant andrave!
So *after* the visit you did this...
>They drove by your house.
STALKING and they took pictures too!
Need a tissue?
Funny you try to be jovial about stalking BUT I bet if I were to do the same toSara you all would be screaming bloody murder!
One bet at a time, blubberbury -- you got the $10k or not?
>Man, what a crime. Have you contacted your DA? His office is in the >courthouse, if you didn't know.
I know where it is. I have been there and I personally know the DA.
Do you, now.
I have known for years!
Then why were you complaining about them being at the DA's office when
your invitation was to the courthouse?
BTW here is some more of your pals' damage control slam dunked:
<snip fatboy's rants, being cited in support of fatboy's rants>
>Perhaps while you visit him you can ask him about what Wire Fraud is.
Why am I concerned about wire fraud?
Ask him.
I have no reason to ask him.
Other than it would appear you have engaged in it.
Unless you actually *have* the $10k?
>Now, about that $10,000 you've been publicly offering..
I made no public offering you repetitious liar and I have already explained it to you numerous times! Anyone clicking this link will see so:
Yes, they'll see you offering $10,000 - as you do again, in this very post.
I made no OFFER.The term OFFER iis your term and I have already addressed theisssue numerous times you hard head!
Actually the word "offer" is the 13th word in your challenge: "To
those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer..."
See? This is why I want the money escrowed before I "slam dunk" you
-- you cannot even remember what you've been cut and pasting for
years, and I don't want you to "forget" to pay me when I post my
proof.
Every time you act like a pinhead I will just post the above stock answer whichexpalins it all! You liars make accusations and don't prove them and then youdemand the victim of your lies to prove they are false! I say- DROP DEAD!
You mean like your accusations of perjury and tax evasion?
<snip>
>Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered
I NEVER publicly "OFFERED" money period.
Though you do exactly that a few lines down...
LIAR!!
Nope. "To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I
offer..."
^^^^^
Can you prove that you have it?
I also never engaged in gambling either though I did use the terminology of "safe bet" which isn't gambling because unlike "luck", "blind chance", "Lady Luck" or whatever- I know what my medical record states!
That's nice. You also know that you've been offering $10,000. Can youprove you have it, or is your offer fraudulent?
I made no OFFER!! can you prove the lies you and your pals are sopreading aretrue? Answer: NO you can't because they are lies!
I am spreading no lies. You are morbidly obese, and I will prove it
as soon as you post proof that your are not going to renege on the
$10k.
I signed it and I have a copy in my possession and I have right in front of me at this very minute! It positively does NOT state what Yale said it did! He lied and when people such as your pals keep repeating Yale's lies they are liars as well. They are too coward to accept the "CHALLENGE" which I have posted numerous times which I do now:
But you just said that you've never offered money.
I haven't! Care to prove I have?
LOL.
Now, you're saying that you've offered it numerous times.
Where did I say "[I've] offered it numerous times"?Lurkers: The above is a classic example of a patholoical liar!
Well, at least fatboy is now admitting he lied.
They makeupies and offer no substantiate which they can't dobecause it's a lie and then they want their target to provetheir lies are false and when you put them on the spoot they keepskirting arround the issue!
--To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer
There it is again!
the $10,000.00 Challenge for Edeikenites Who Won't Admit Yale Lied!
>Specifically, think of the $10,000 you've publicly offered and over wires >that cross state lines- Fraudulently, I'd have to say, since you refuse >to prove you have it.
First I am a private citizen and I am not dealing in a commercial for profit venture and I made no OFFER!
You *just* said that you did.
LIAR!!
"To those people who can only hurl obese or fat insults I offer the$10,000.00 Challenge "Look familiar?
YES!! Why don't you put yourself on the spot and try to substantiate Yale's liehe started and spread about what my medical record stated!?
I will, as soon as I am assured that you have the $10k you have
offered in exchange for that proof.
You losers areb so pathetic that you have to makeup lies tosmear me andfabricate evidence to use against me in civil lawsuits!Care to count all of the perjury and fabrications in your hero's faied lawsuiitagainst me?
Sure. Lemme see ... umm ... multiply by ... carry the five ... don't
forget the decimal ... okay.
That figure would be exactly:
Zero.
<snip the Shame of Belleville repeated baseless accusations that
have been dealt with before...>
If you think you have a case bring it on and we will see whose *** gets burned when the judge sees my CHALLENGE,
Which offers $10,000. Do you have the money or not? It's a simplequestion.
BEEN ANSWERED NUMEROUS YOU STUPID ONE:
Nope. A "yes" or a "no" will do.
>Unless you can prove that you have the money, you may >well qualify for a federal "wire fraud" investigation,
BRING IT ON!!! They will probably charge you with filing false reports
And what reports will those be?
They would be the ones filong themm so file your complaint and see what happensyou numbskull!
Care to try that in English?
when the whole truth comes out!
Do you have the $10,000 for your "challenge", or not?
BEEN ANSWERED!!
Nope. A "yes" or a "no" will do.
>possibly sped up by your links to Al-Queda supporters.
What links? What support to Al-Queda? You are a liar and smear is all youhave! Care to show any USENET post or web document where I have ever declared MYsupport to Al-Queda? You are just like the Children of the Devil YOUsupport!!
You've sought help and "best wishes" from Mr. Michael, who you know hassupported Al-Queda,
How is it I sought help from David Michael and how is it I sought as you put it-"best wishes"?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=obnf00t0cs1accl16sttnnr6tdr9h4nt3v%404 ax.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
The subject: "Ping David Michael- Do I have your permission and best
wishes to..."
<quote>
May I submit your e-mail address as being a witness and a recipient of
Yale's malicious prosecutions as well?
</quote>
See? "Best Wishes" and a request for help.
This is why I want the $10k escrowed -- you cannot even remember what
you yourself wrote less than two weeks ago. How do I know you won't
"forget" to pay me after I prove your obesity?
and who you know has applauded the murder of Americans.Don't you remember?
I do rememebr but evidently you forgot I made numerous strong denunciationsagainst his statements too!
My proof:http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Nnxp7.8929%24Aa7.824001%40news20.bellglobal.c om&rnum=3&filter=0(Archived locally as: PatrickKcaught)From: "Patrick Keenan" <pkeenanxx@hotmail.com>Newsgroups: alt.revisionismMessage-ID: <Nnxp7.8929$Aa7.824001@news20.bellglobal.com>Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:24:24 -0400"Doc Tavish" <doc_tavish@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in messagenews:oh5dqtc7ooi48tt5ncf8vtldgkq62sehe7@4ax .com... On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:21:36 -0400, <jg_brown-9F2130.10213617092001@news.alt.net> "Jeffrey G. Brown" <jg_brown@my-deja.com> wrote:In article <b7fe1abc.0109170556.e5e66ab@posting.google.com>,david_michael@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:> Gentlemen, it appears that the civilian death toll in this incident> will be around 5,000. Nobody has a precise figure about how many> civilians were killed in the American bombing of Hiroshima and> Nagasaki -- I've seen estimates around the 270,000 mark. Japan started it with a sneak attack. Japan was also waging genocide against mainland China and brutally treating American POWs...[...]> -- so don't you *dare* criticize me for expressing heartfelt joy when> someone finally turns around and gives the Establishment the bloody> nose it so richly deserves.Mass murder is not a 'bloody nose'. It is mass murder.-pk You truly deserve the name of Lord Haw Haw you detestable vermin. BTW drop dead!No one who has pointed out Michael's moral inversion in "expressing heartfeltjoy" at the deaths of more than 5000 people has *ever* "praised" the bombing ofHiroshima or Nagasaki. History is being made today- I agree with you Jeffrey G. Brown. Doc Tavish ~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
There's no denunciation at all there, let alone a strong one.
The above was your own post Patrick! Anyone can see how pissed off I was andeven more so seeing me actually agreeing with Jeffrey G.Brown whom I detest asmuch as I detest you!!! Hardly looks like I supported 9-11 does it!?
No one claimed you did, only that you are seeking best wishes and
assistance from one who did.
>That could easily win you a new place to live, board included.
Filing false complaints will get you free room and board and engaging in actionable libel is also not all too wise either you liar and libeler!
I've only been using your words, Mr. Bradbury. That's hardly libel.
My own words? You mean you have posted what you think I have said!
No, he means your words.
Now speaking of falsehoods, can you prove that you have the $10,000 to backup your challenge?
BEEN ANSWERED NUMEROUS TIMES!!
Nope. A "yes" or a "no' will suffice.
>Oh, and if you've made such "challenges" before.. the charges stack.
The CHALLENGE is the burden of proof for the liars to substantiate Yale's lie and when they can't then each one of them is to give me a $1000.00!
So that's your plan - to get $1000 from each of several people without beingable to back up your own position.
I can back up my claim that my medical record did not state what Yale falselyclaimed and oit is you and your fellowfilth who can't back up Yale'sie!THAT IS THE REAL ISSUE!!
No, the issue is that your challenge has been accepted, but that you
cannot be trusted not to renege, and so the money your have offered
will need to be placed in escrow with appropriate instructions for its
disbursement.
PLAIN AND SIMPLE- EVEN A HARD HEAD LIKE YOU SHOULD GET THE POINT BY NOW!!
You know, you've just set up another of the conditions for wire fraud.
Report me then you stupid jerk! I insist and don't be a coward and make a reportanonymously either!
You mean like your threat to sue me?
Now, do you have the money to back up your "challenge" or not?
You are just like a needle stuck in a groove on a skipping record.Here I illustrate how I am your opposite- I do make an accusation and I do proveit!
Not in what I have snipped, which has been addressed here, and by the
CCRA and the IRS as well.
Do you have my $10k or not?
