In article <20040204143806.24654.00001377@mb-m16.aol.com>,
Celesta666 <celesta666@aol.com> wrote:Of course, a less interesting but more obnoxious response would be:http://www.wellexcusemeprincess.com/These two site responses will cover any drivel that might emanate fromchsnchild or any of her infamous sock puppets.a'Dios,-Paul


So is it your view that anyone who is anti-Bush is a sock puppet? What a
load of crap.

You seem to be enjoy insulting women as well. Grow up.


Linda

Enjoying the Bushies stumbling all over themselves about WMD in Iraq.
One day powell says that if he knew then what he knows now he would have
been against the Iraq invasion. The next day he contradicts himself
again.

Rumsfield still insists that WMD are there.

They seem to have borrowed Clinton's crack enhance PR disasters team.

..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..

In article <20040204143806.24654.00001377@mb-m16.aol.com>,
Celesta666 <celesta666@aol.com> wrote:Of course, a less interesting but more obnoxious response would be:http://www.wellexcusemeprincess.com/These two site responses will cover any drivel that might emanate fromchsnchild or any of her infamous sock puppets.a'Dios,-Paul

lfortney@dc.umd.edu (Linda Fortney) replied:
So is it your view that anyone who is anti-Bush is a sock puppet?What a load of crap.

No, that is not my view. Please re-read the original post above: i was
referring to *marcy's* sock puppets, which are legion (and mostly
ill-mannered). I mentioned absolutely nothing about president bush. The
purpose of my post was to try to help my good friend steve explore alternative
ways of expressing himself to marcy, though i believe his original response was
most succinct.

With respect to president bush, president clinton, or politics in general, i
usually do not express my opinions in public forums. I do not mind that others
do, it is just my personal preference. Politically, i would gravitate toward
marley greiner's version of "anarchist with paleo-tendencies." You see, marley
and steve do not agree on certain political issues, but i still admire and
respect both of them tremendously and enjoy reading their views. I have
learned a lot from both of them.
You seem to be enjoy insulting women as well. Grow up.

Actually, I was just insulting marcy, and yes, i did enjoy it. In general,
though, i love women. I have read your posts for years now, linda, and while i
do not agree with some of your views, i do enjoy reading them and i respect you
a great deal.

a'Dios,
-Paul

PS:
http://www.bastards.org/events/chicfot.htm
I am directly to the left of marley, and steve is directly under damsey's "BUT"

In article <c00job$akh@marlowe.umd.edu>,
lfortney@dc.umd.edu (Linda Fortney) wrote:
In article <20040204143806.24654.00001377@mb-m16.aol.com>, Celesta666 <celesta666@aol.com> wrote:Of course, a less interesting but more obnoxious response would be:http://www.wellexcusemeprincess.com/These two site responses will cover any drivel that might emanate fromchsnchild or any of her infamous sock puppets.a'Dios,-Paul So is it your view that anyone who is anti-Bush is a sock puppet? What a load of crap.


No, I think he was implying that Marcy has sock puppets.

Enjoying the Bushies stumbling all over themselves about WMD in Iraq. One day powell says that if he knew then what he knows now he would have been against the Iraq invasion. The next day he contradicts himself again. Rumsfield still insists that WMD are there. They seem to have borrowed Clinton's crack enhance PR disasters team.


Politicans are the same the world over. Too bad the Left can't
acknowledge the elephant in the room: Saddam was a fascist in the
classic sense of the word. If they could have it would have made all
this a lot easier.

GWB and Co. may have screwed the pooch on the political handling the WMD
issue, but they were right about the rest.




steve
--
--
Steven White <stevewhitemd@earthlink.net>

In article <20040206135039.11447.00001441@mb-m05.aol.com>,
celesta666@aol.com (Celesta666) wrote:
So is it your view that anyone who is anti-Bush is a sock puppet?What a load of crap. No, that is not my view. Please re-read the original post above: i was referring to *marcy's* sock puppets, which are legion (and mostly ill-mannered). I mentioned absolutely nothing about president bush. The purpose of my post was to try to help my good friend steve explore alternative ways of expressing himself to marcy, though i believe his original response was most succinct.


Thanks, I try!

With respect to president bush, president clinton, or politics in general, i usually do not express my opinions in public forums. I do not mind that others do, it is just my personal preference. Politically, i would gravitate toward marley greiner's version of "anarchist with paleo-tendencies." You see, marley and steve do not agree on certain political issues, but i still admire and respect both of them tremendously and enjoy reading their views. I have learned a lot from both of them.


Thanks again! I do enjoy "mixing it up" with people with disagree
politically. With a few exceptions, I can keep it pretty civil. Marley
and I disagree with each other but we can enjoy each other's writing. As
for Marcy, um, what was the URL again?

http://www.bastards.org/events/chicfot.htm I am directly to the left of marley, and steve is directly under damsey's "BUT"


Egad :-)




steve
--
--
Steven White <stevewhitemd@earthlink.net>

"Celesta666" <celesta666@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040206135039.11447.00001441@mb-m05.aol.com... In article <20040204143806.24654.00001377@mb-m16.aol.com>, Celesta666 <celesta666@aol.com> wrote:Of course, a less interesting but more obnoxious response would be:http://www.wellexcusemeprincess.com/These two site responses will cover any drivel that might emanate fromchsnchild or any of her infamous sock puppets.a'Dios,-Paul lfortney@dc.umd.edu (Linda Fortney) replied:So is it your view that anyone who is anti-Bush is a sock puppet?What a load of crap. No, that is not my view. Please re-read the original post above: i was referring to *marcy's* sock puppets, which are legion (and mostly ill-mannered). I mentioned absolutely nothing about president bush. The purpose of my post was to try to help my good friend steve explore
alternative ways of expressing himself to marcy, though i believe his original
response was most succinct.

"Explore alternataive ways." hehhehYou'be been making the univresity
circuit lately? With respect to president bush, president clinton, or politics in general,
i usually do not express my opinions in public forums. I do not mind that
others do, it is just my personal preference. Politically, i would gravitate
toward marley greiner's version of "anarchist with paleo-tendencies." You see,
marley and steve do not agree on certain political issues, but i still admire and respect both of them tremendously and enjoy reading their views. I have learned a lot from both of them.

I'm glad to see I'm not alone. Ifelt my opinions are worthy of total
isolation from the rest of society, but you and I can enjoy our exile with
the comfort of knowing now that we are not alone.You seem to be enjoy insulting women as well. Grow up. Actually, I was just insulting marcy, and yes, i did enjoy it. In
general, though, i love women. I have read your posts for years now, linda, and
while i do not agree with some of your views, i do enjoy reading them and i
respect you a great deal. a'Dios, -Paul PS: http://www.bastards.org/events/chicfot.htm I am directly to the left of marley, and steve is directly under damsey's
"BUT"

Golly gee, Mr. 666, it is you! You're famous!

Marley

"Steve White" <stevewhitemd@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:stevewhitemd-26E8F1.17492406022004@news.uchicago.edu... In article <20040206135039.11447.00001441@mb-m05.aol.com>, celesta666@aol.com (Celesta666) wrote: http://www.bastards.org/events/chicfot.htm I am directly to the left of marley, and steve is directly under
damsey's "BUT" Egad :-)
Ebald is more like it. Sheesh.

Jack

In article <C8_Ub.32628$0O6.14028@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>,
"Jack Bernhard" <jcbernhard@deletethisprodigy.net> wrote:

http://www.bastards.org/events/chicfot.htm
Egad :-) Ebald is more like it. Sheesh.


The head is perfect, it need not be hidden with hair :-)




steve

In article <20040206135039.11447.00001441@mb-m05.aol.com>,
Celesta666 <celesta666@aol.com> wrote:No, that is not my view. Please re-read the original post above: i wasreferring to *marcy's* sock puppets, which are legion (and mostlyill-mannered).

Paul, I haven't seen a Marcy sock puppet here.





I mentioned absolutely nothing about president bush. Thepurpose of my post was to try to help my good friend steve explore alternativeways of expressing himself to marcy, though i believe his original response wasmost succinct.

Look, I am no fan whatsoever of the way Marcy makes a living, but I am
also not a fan of namecalling, particularly the c-word. I am not
net-nanny, but I personally find ad-hominem attacks on people who have
different political views quite tiresome.

And, for the record, I realize tyhat Marcy's political comments--e.g.
anyone in the military who votes for Bush does so because they are stupid
or uneducated--completely abhorent.
do not agree with some of your views, i do enjoy reading them and i respect youa great deal.


Thank you Paul. I apologize for my misinterpretation of your post.

Linda