Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: Ken Smith wrote:Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:"Vox Populi" wrote:>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:>>Ken Smith wrote:

>>>If you think the Matthew Hale case is bad, you will find mine *truly*>>>appalling.>>>>Ken Smith is apparently having delusions of grandeur again.>>Sez Teddy, the bigotedWhat, "bigoted"? Where do I exhibit any signs of bigotry?USENET. And you believe everything you read on USENET?

No, but the question is whether you exhibited any signs of bigotry,
and your writings constitute compelling evidence of it.
Often. NEVER!See, e.g., the collection attached. [Misleading, out-of-context quotes elided.]

They *are* your posts, aren't they? There is no context that I know
of that *could* save them! Lying sack of adipose tissue....>violentBZZZZZZZTTT!!! LIE! I have NEVER participated in any acts of violence,nor have I ever committed any acts of violence myself.See, e.g., the account you gave of your participation in a conspiracy tocommit armed robbery (attached). There was never any "conspiracy" to commit armed robbery, or any other crime for that matter, violent or otherwise. All there was was an agreement to go out and get some beer, which, to the best of my knowledge, isn't in itself a crime (assuming one is of age, as we all were). What transpired was the doing of others, something to which I was neither a party nor in agreement with. Moreover, no robbery ever took place, nor did any actual battery in that incident. And anyway, I was aloof from it at the time.

The reasonable juror would see otherwise. But then again, you insist
that your brother-in-law is totally blameless for the death and apparent
murder of his illegitimate four-year-old daughter (see, some of Teddi's
arguments, attached).