Notes About Deceptive All Capitals Names

What follows is a letter to the (Oregon) State Registrar of Vital
Statistics. It appears to be a request for a particular directive,
issued by the State Registrar to the various county registrars who
prepare birth certificates. Don't be fooled by the appearances. The
real purpose of the letter is for use as a forum to expose a vital
truth about how men, women and children are legally converted into
mere things; HUMAN RESOURCES and raw materials for exploitation to
profit a relatively few beneficiaries of a perverted government
monopoly. Whether or not the State Registrar fills my request is not
important. It won't change the facts revealed in the letter. (I seldom
ask questions of a bureaucrat when I don't know the answers in
advance)!
After the letter you will find reproductions of relevant parts of two
different birth certificates: one issued in Ohio after the birth of my
son, David, and the other issued in Oregon after the birth of my
grandson, Andrew. They will help the reader visualize the fact that
the "curious practice of mixing real names with fictitious names" is
not unique to Oregon. As nearly as I can determine, it is practiced by
preparers of birth certificates in all states. And it has been going
on for at least 16 years - nationwide. Knowing that, you will also
realize that the source of the command for such a "curious practice"
is at the national, or even the international, level. The practice is
systemic. [Editor; You can receive copies of the birth certificates
from author James Hazel.]
One other thing that is not made perfectly clear in the following
letter is the fact that the "names" of "artificial persons," such as
corporations and "assumed business names," are written in all
UPPERCASE letters. Since they are fictional or fictitious "things,"
they require fictitious names. Don't confuse a fictitious name with an
alias (alias dictus).
"Alias" is when one is known by two or more different names. The term
refers only to natural persons, not to artificial "persons." A natural
person may be known by as many names as he chooses, for any lawful
reason - or for no reason. For example: so long as he doesn't use
different names with the intention to commit fraud, "James Smith" may
lawfully also be known as "John Jones." An alias, being a name of a
natural person, is always capitalized.
To the contrary, "a fictitious name is a counterfeit, feigned or
pretended name taken by a person, differing in some particular from
his true name, with the implication that it is meant to deceive and
mislead" (Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition).
A fictitious name may be assumed by a natural person. But the "name"
of an artificial "person" is ALWAYS a fictitious name, and every
attorney will acknowledge that the names of artificial "persons" are
always fictitious names.
Real names are always capitalized, that is, the first letter of the
name is capitalized, and the subsequent letters are written in
lowercase. Fictitious names are generally written in all uppercase
letters, so they can be distinguished from real names. It's common for
typists to improperly write fictitious names in the same "style" as
real names. Sometimes the error is driven by the writer's ignorance,
but often it is motivated by an intent to deceive.
The real name of our friend, John Smith is written (you guessed it!)
"John Smith." "JOHN SMITH" on the other hand, is a fictitious name by
virtue of the fact that it doesn't conform to the rule of grammar
which requires capitalization of names. Except for absence of
capitalization, it is spelled like our friend's name, and it sounds
the same when spoken orally. But it's not the name for John Smith. The
"name" is fictitious in and of itself, since it is not a real name.
If John Smith were to examine the driver license in his wallet, and
the Social Security card he holds, his old military I.D., and every
card, check and statement related to his banking, he would discover
that none of them are in his name. They all concern fictitious names!
If that doesn't alarm John - wait until he learns that his children
and grandchildren: those natural, beautiful flesh, blood and spirit
fruits of his loins - bear fictitious names of THINGS; or "artificial
persons!"
James Hazel
P.O. Box 863
Mount Angel OR 97362
December 11, 1995
Edward Johnson II,
State Registrar of Vital Statistics
P.O. Box 14050
Portland OR 97214-0050
Re: Forms for entries of names on birth certificates: REQUEST FOR COPY
OF DIRECTIVE
Dear Registrar Johnson:

It recently came to my attention, while examining the birth
certificate issued pursuant to the birth of my grandson (copy enclosed
for your reference) that the data entered in the box reserved for
"CHILD-NAME" is inconsistent. The "First and Middle" given, Christian
names are properly capitalized in conformance with the rule of English
grammar which governs the writing of names; i.e. "Names are always
capitalized." But under the section reserved for the "Last" name,
"HAZEL," in all uppercase letters, is entered.
Obviously, "HAZEL" is not a name.
Names for natural persons are, of course, always capitalized; that is,
the initial letter of the word/name stands distinctly higher than the
subsequent letters. Typically, when expressed in type, the initial
letter is taken from the uppercase and the subsequent letters are
taken from the lowercase. The result is that there can be no ambiguity
or confusion as to whether a word is a name/proper noun or a common
word or common noun.
Artificial persons (which are actually contrived things that are
endowed with a few of the legal powers and privileges of natural
persons) are given fictitious names. It is fitting and appropriate
that fictitious "persons," as legal fictions, should be given
fictitious names to distinguish them from other fictional entities,
and from natural persons.
A person may apply to the CORPORATION DIVISION of the office of the
SECRETARY OF STATE, for the establishment and registration of an
ASSUMED BUSINESS NAME. The purpose of such a name is, of course, to
enter into activity for the intention of making a profit. The "name"
that is then established and registered is a fictitious name; not a
real name.
Since it does not conform with the rule of grammar which requires
capitalization of names of persons, places and things, "HAZEL," as it
appears on the birth certificate discussed herein - obviously intended
to be assumed and taken as a family surname - is a fictitious name.
Where the fictitious name (HAZEL) is entered into a box reserved for
"CHILD-NAME," and mixed together in that box with the
correctly-written given, Christian names for the child, the data in
that box is inconsistent .
It would seem to logically follow that, where one-third of the "names"
in a "name context" or box is fictitious, all of the "names," taken
together, are fictitious - sort of by the same principle that "one
rotten apple will spoil the barrel" or "guilt by association."
My concern is that, by some legal mechanism unknown to us, which has
been executed against our interests without full disclosure to us, and
without our knowledge and express or affirmative consent, we may have
been converted into things, possibly to be used as merchandise for the
profit or benefit of an unknown (to us) owner. If that is the case, it
had to happen through our unknowing tacit consent. We would certainly
never consider entering into such an arrangement voluntarily
I have examined birth certificates issued over the past 15 years in
other state jurisdictions, and have found the form of entry of "names"
to be identical with that used on the birth certificate herein under
discussion.
I have talked with county registrars, who have advised me that they
are required to use that form of entry under direction of the State
Registrar. But none could or would provide me with a copy of such a
directive. They referred me to your office for a copy of the
directive.
Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 333-11-016(2)(h) provides that:
Unless otherwise directed by the state Registrar, no certificate shall
be complete and correct and acceptable for registration: that contains
improper or inconsistent data; -
The Rule clearly provides that birth certificates may contain
inconsistent data, such as inconsistent mixing of names with
fictitious names, but only WHEN DIRECTED BY THE STATE REGISTRAR.
Please provide me with a copy of your directive authorizing the mixing
of name-forms on birth certificates. If no such directive has issued
from your office, please provide me with the application for
correcting of false information which appears on a birth certificate.
Yours Truly,
James Hazel
Concluding Remarks
In his Revelation, Saint John labored to describe a Beast which
enslaved Men, and devoured their souls. He exposed the nature and
mentality of the Beast's servants and supporters, of those who - like
attorneys - spoke for the Beast; and those who executed its commands,
and those lukewarm quislings who gave it their moral support - even at
the cost of their children's lives. But Saint John wrote in highly
symbolic terms - farfetched from the normal experiences of men. His
intent may have been to save individuals from their baser instincts,
and raise them to higher levels of consciousness - or to do the same
for humanity as a whole... OR BOTH. The result was a Book, which
however influential and powerful, is esoteric. His general revelations
are profound, but lack the concrete details we need to understand the
schemes the Beast's servants use to manipulate and exploit innocent
men, women and children, to understand sufficiently that we will be
able to defend ourselves against the schemes.
The foregoing Letter to the Registrar is an attempt to layer some
visible flesh onto the Saint John's etheric skeleton.
In his 13th Chapter, Saint John warned his posterity that another
beast would ascend which would execute or nail down the supremacy of
the original Beast which, for lack of an effective scheme, had so far
been unable to convert all Men into virtually inanimate things, a
conversion necessary to directly treat them as merchandise to be
milked and traded in a commercial monopoly.
Saint John predicted that the latter, irresistible scheme would
persuade all Men to believe (worship) the idea that their very lives
depended on their ability to buy and sell; to get a piece of the
action of the only game in town! They might sense that the deck was
stacked, but the deceptive tricks of the magicians who dealt their
hands - being consummate lawyers and symbolaeographers, and dedicated
servants of the Beast - were almost impossible to catch. John revealed
the governing "trick" - in general terms: In order to buy and sell
(and therefore not be killed by poverty), all men must agree to do one
of two things. They must not object to being marked or branded as the
Beast is marked. The Beast, being fictitious and having no real
existence in nature or reality - but existing only in the minds of
gullible men - is marked or branded by Nature Itself to be a
fictitious thing. Begin a fictitious thing, the beast is marked with a
pretend name... a mark that looks like a name, but really isn't.
No beast can speak for itself, but only through lawyers and agents.
The lawyers who administered the schemes of the second Beast,
established the "law" which mandates that no natural person may buy or
sell, or otherwise seek a profit, in his own Name. They define such
activities as business; "Activity entered into with the intent of
making a profit" - and require such persons to assume fictitious names
for purposes related to business. IT IS THE FICTION which is the mark
or brand Saint John warns against! It is the same NUMBER (measure) of
what the Beast is; the precise level at which it resides in reality;
it's status in relationship to every thing else - which is FICTIONAL.
And in accordance with the Rule of English Grammar it is marked or
represented, not by a capitalized name, but by a fictitious "name."
Otherwise "natural persons" who wish to participate in the
Beast-System (a worldwide commercial monopoly), and to buy the labor
and souls of other men, while selling their own to the highest bidder
must receive from the Beast (System), the privilege of using
fictitious names.
Only the managers of the scheme are required to know how the system
functions. It is they who dictate the policies that keep it running
smoothly; who provide for necessary adjustments and refinements to
make the system ever more irresistible. Who determine among themselves
what the short-term and long-term objectives will be.
It is also incumbent on the pivotal lawyers - especially judges - to
learn the deceptive principles which drive the system - so they will
be able to suppress valid challenges to its supremacy.
But it is requisite that members of the common herd be imprisoned in
abject ignorance, never doubting that they are "free and
self-sovereign individuals" who are in full control of their lives and
families, and who can speak freely on any subject they choose, and
worship whatever God their consciences dictate.
And it is especially essential that the soldiers (policy-enforcement
officers), who are required to suppress human activities which tend to
undermine the monopoly business venture, be drawn from the least
imaginative and sensitive humans. While they are chosen for their love
of violence, and must exhibit physical bravery - only intellectual and
spiritual cowards are eligible to become military, executorial,
persons.
The "Latter Beast" appeared in embryonic form barely 100 years ago.
Since its advent, it has matured into the monolithic form we "see"
today. Despite dire predictions of "an impending collapse of society
as we know it today," the Beast (System) will not implode into itself.
It will not self-destruct. It will continue on its course; growing
ever powerful and irresistible. UNLESS IT MEETS AN IMMOVABLE OBJECT
THAT IS DETERMINED TO VAPORIZE IT BACK INTO THE NOTHINGNESS FROM WHICH
IT CAME!
"The System" can be rocked on its axis if numerous real, live, flesh
and blood people will act on relevant FACTS, instead of remaining
paralyzed by delusions.
"The System" cannot totally prevail except by its "legal process" of
affecting individuals by persuading them to let themselves be directly
affected by it. People "volunteer" by assuming that the fictitious
names, held out so temptingly to them, require them to assume
responsibility for everything done in the fictitious names.
Before the fictitious name scheme became a universal syndrome,
individuals could only be directly affected by due process of law
which required a real, named person to accuse him of liability for an
injury committed by the accused. The injury must have been committed
in a particular NAMED venue; i.e. in a particular state and county.
The controversy raised under oath by the accuser, would be tried and
resolved in a particular NAMED court. The accusatory instrument was
required to identify the natural person by his NAME. A typical
accusatory instrument set out all the required names in its caption,
like this:
In the Circuit Court of the State
of Oregon for Marion County
State of Oregon, )
vs. ) Criminal Complaint
James Hazel )
Now, under the "Latter Beast System," ALL NAMES in accusatory
instruments are fictitious:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION
STATE OF OREGON )
VS. ) CRIMINAL
JAMES HAZEL ) COMPLAINT
In the final analysis, "government" can only affect you through an
administrative or "judicial" accusation - demanding that you "appear"
and "answer." Regardless of how many times in the past you have
tacitly (albeit innocently and ignorantly) "acknowledged" a fictitious
name, when you insist, your natural being can only be represented by a
REAL CAPITALIZED NAME. Therefore, being addressed or even arrested by
a fictitious name, which does not mark your natural being, there is
nothing for you to answer. You simply say: "The accusation must be
abated, it is void. My name is ("John Jones"; capital J, o, h, n;
capital J, o, n, e, s ). The accused, 'JOHN JONES,' is not an alias;
it is a fictitious name - and not mine."
"Answered" thus, numerous times in fictitious courts and agencies
which pollute the Land - the Latter Beast will begin to tremble... as
does an evil man when death approaches.
Appendix -More about Names

"My" birth certificate, issued in Montana in 1937, reserved a box for
"Full name of child," with no mention of "first, middle or last
names." The form required entry of both the father's and mother's
"color or race," indicating the subject of the certificate was the
birth of a natural being.
The birth certificate issued in Ohio in 1943, upon my wife's birth,
reserved a box for "(CHILD) NAME," and provided spaces for "First,"
"Middle" and "Last." The form required entry of both the father's and
mother's "COLOR OR RACE!"
The birth certificate issued in Ohio in 1980, upon the birth of my
youngest son, reserves a box for: "CHILD-NAME," with spaces for
"First," "Middle" and "Last." The form has no box or space for the
"color" or "race" of either parent.
The birth certificate issued in Oregon in 1989, upon the birth of my
grandson, reserves a box for "CHILD-NAME" with spaces for "First,"
"Middle" and "Last" - a form identical to that for "my son's" birth
certificate; and like my son's, does not demand the color or race of
the parents. There is nothing on "their" birth certificates to verify
that the "CHILD-NAME(s)" entered on them, are the names for natural
beings; born of parents having natural color or race.
Another "curious" difference between the forms: The forms for myself,
my wife, and youngest son, each require entry of "THE MOTHER'S MAIDEN
NAME," and are disinterested in the mother's current name. But the
form for my grandson (1989), requires entry of the mother's (current)
name; with a separate box for "MAIDEN SURNAME." His is the only
certificate which mentions "surname."
The four foregoing examples demonstrate very disturbing changes in
birth certificate forms implemented over several decades!
A person's "Christian (christened) or given name" is his primary name.
The so-called "middle name" is superfluous for all legal purposes. A
"surname" is generally assumed to be a family name or the
"patronymic." By legal definition, "surname" means "The last name; the
name common to all members of a family." But technically, "surname"
means a name "which is excessive, extreme; or over, beyond or above
the given (christened) name."
"Last" (regarding the Last Name entered on three of the foregoing
birth certificates) means: "the only remaining part of a collection or
sequence; most recent, latest; highest, greatest or utmost; most
valid, authoritative or conclusive."
The case is prima facie! As far as "the states"' functionaries are
concerned, "your" name stands for a fictional thing intended for use
in commerce. And as a fiction created by a "state," it (and you) are
presumed subject to all of the regulations for commerce; including
regulation and taxation.
Let "the state" do what it wishes with the fictitious names it
creates... until it equates one with YOU. Then, defend your real name,
and your honor, and your self by every means at your command - as if
your life and soul depends on it!

One word for Jimmy: RETARD
TaxEase

"Jimmy" <jimmy_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:469f4ba8.0307200557.6d9ca3c1@posting.google.c om... Notes About Deceptive All Capitals Names What follows is a letter to the (Oregon) State Registrar of Vital Statistics. It appears to be a request for a particular directive, issued by the State Registrar to the various county registrars who prepare birth certificates. Don't be fooled by the appearances. The real purpose of the letter is for use as a forum to expose a vital truth about how men, women and children are legally converted into mere things; HUMAN RESOURCES and raw materials for exploitation to profit a relatively few beneficiaries of a perverted government monopoly. Whether or not the State Registrar fills my request is not important. It won't change the facts revealed in the letter. (I seldom ask questions of a bureaucrat when I don't know the answers in advance)! After the letter you will find reproductions of relevant parts of two different birth certificates: one issued in Ohio after the birth of my son, David, and the other issued in Oregon after the birth of my grandson, Andrew. They will help the reader visualize the fact that the "curious practice of mixing real names with fictitious names" is not unique to Oregon. As nearly as I can determine, it is practiced by preparers of birth certificates in all states. And it has been going on for at least 16 years - nationwide. Knowing that, you will also realize that the source of the command for such a "curious practice" is at the national, or even the international, level. The practice is systemic. [Editor; You can receive copies of the birth certificates from author James Hazel.] One other thing that is not made perfectly clear in the following letter is the fact that the "names" of "artificial persons," such as corporations and "assumed business names," are written in all UPPERCASE letters. Since they are fictional or fictitious "things," they require fictitious names. Don't confuse a fictitious name with an alias (alias dictus). "Alias" is when one is known by two or more different names. The term refers only to natural persons, not to artificial "persons." A natural person may be known by as many names as he chooses, for any lawful reason - or for no reason. For example: so long as he doesn't use different names with the intention to commit fraud, "James Smith" may lawfully also be known as "John Jones." An alias, being a name of a natural person, is always capitalized. To the contrary, "a fictitious name is a counterfeit, feigned or pretended name taken by a person, differing in some particular from his true name, with the implication that it is meant to deceive and mislead" (Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition). A fictitious name may be assumed by a natural person. But the "name" of an artificial "person" is ALWAYS a fictitious name, and every attorney will acknowledge that the names of artificial "persons" are always fictitious names. Real names are always capitalized, that is, the first letter of the name is capitalized, and the subsequent letters are written in lowercase. Fictitious names are generally written in all uppercase letters, so they can be distinguished from real names. It's common for typists to improperly write fictitious names in the same "style" as real names. Sometimes the error is driven by the writer's ignorance, but often it is motivated by an intent to deceive. The real name of our friend, John Smith is written (you guessed it!) "John Smith." "JOHN SMITH" on the other hand, is a fictitious name by virtue of the fact that it doesn't conform to the rule of grammar which requires capitalization of names. Except for absence of capitalization, it is spelled like our friend's name, and it sounds the same when spoken orally. But it's not the name for John Smith. The "name" is fictitious in and of itself, since it is not a real name. If John Smith were to examine the driver license in his wallet, and the Social Security card he holds, his old military I.D., and every card, check and statement related to his banking, he would discover that none of them are in his name. They all concern fictitious names! If that doesn't alarm John - wait until he learns that his children and grandchildren: those natural, beautiful flesh, blood and spirit fruits of his loins - bear fictitious names of THINGS; or "artificial persons!" James Hazel P.O. Box 863 Mount Angel OR 97362 December 11, 1995 Edward Johnson II, State Registrar of Vital Statistics P.O. Box 14050 Portland OR 97214-0050 Re: Forms for entries of names on birth certificates: REQUEST FOR COPY OF DIRECTIVE Dear Registrar Johnson: It recently came to my attention, while examining the birth certificate issued pursuant to the birth of my grandson (copy enclosed for your reference) that the data entered in the box reserved for "CHILD-NAME" is inconsistent. The "First and Middle" given, Christian names are properly capitalized in conformance with the rule of English grammar which governs the writing of names; i.e. "Names are always capitalized." But under the section reserved for the "Last" name, "HAZEL," in all uppercase letters, is entered. Obviously, "HAZEL" is not a name. Names for natural persons are, of course, always capitalized; that is, the initial letter of the word/name stands distinctly higher than the subsequent letters. Typically, when expressed in type, the initial letter is taken from the uppercase and the subsequent letters are taken from the lowercase. The result is that there can be no ambiguity or confusion as to whether a word is a name/proper noun or a common word or common noun. Artificial persons (which are actually contrived things that are endowed with a few of the legal powers and privileges of natural persons) are given fictitious names. It is fitting and appropriate that fictitious "persons," as legal fictions, should be given fictitious names to distinguish them from other fictional entities, and from natural persons. A person may apply to the CORPORATION DIVISION of the office of the SECRETARY OF STATE, for the establishment and registration of an ASSUMED BUSINESS NAME. The purpose of such a name is, of course, to enter into activity for the intention of making a profit. The "name" that is then established and registered is a fictitious name; not a real name. Since it does not conform with the rule of grammar which requires capitalization of names of persons, places and things, "HAZEL," as it appears on the birth certificate discussed herein - obviously intended to be assumed and taken as a family surname - is a fictitious name. Where the fictitious name (HAZEL) is entered into a box reserved for "CHILD-NAME," and mixed together in that box with the correctly-written given, Christian names for the child, the data in that box is inconsistent . It would seem to logically follow that, where one-third of the "names" in a "name context" or box is fictitious, all of the "names," taken together, are fictitious - sort of by the same principle that "one rotten apple will spoil the barrel" or "guilt by association." My concern is that, by some legal mechanism unknown to us, which has been executed against our interests without full disclosure to us, and without our knowledge and express or affirmative consent, we may have been converted into things, possibly to be used as merchandise for the profit or benefit of an unknown (to us) owner. If that is the case, it had to happen through our unknowing tacit consent. We would certainly never consider entering into such an arrangement voluntarily I have examined birth certificates issued over the past 15 years in other state jurisdictions, and have found the form of entry of "names" to be identical with that used on the birth certificate herein under discussion. I have talked with county registrars, who have advised me that they are required to use that form of entry under direction of the State Registrar. But none could or would provide me with a copy of such a directive. They referred me to your office for a copy of the directive. Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 333-11-016(2)(h) provides that: Unless otherwise directed by the state Registrar, no certificate shall be complete and correct and acceptable for registration: that contains improper or inconsistent data; - The Rule clearly provides that birth certificates may contain inconsistent data, such as inconsistent mixing of names with fictitious names, but only WHEN DIRECTED BY THE STATE REGISTRAR. Please provide me with a copy of your directive authorizing the mixing of name-forms on birth certificates. If no such directive has issued from your office, please provide me with the application for correcting of false information which appears on a birth certificate. Yours Truly, James Hazel Concluding Remarks In his Revelation, Saint John labored to describe a Beast which enslaved Men, and devoured their souls. He exposed the nature and mentality of the Beast's servants and supporters, of those who - like attorneys - spoke for the Beast; and those who executed its commands, and those lukewarm quislings who gave it their moral support - even at the cost of their children's lives. But Saint John wrote in highly symbolic terms - farfetched from the normal experiences of men. His intent may have been to save individuals from their baser instincts, and raise them to higher levels of consciousness - or to do the same for humanity as a whole... OR BOTH. The result was a Book, which however influential and powerful, is esoteric. His general revelations are profound, but lack the concrete details we need to understand the schemes the Beast's servants use to manipulate and exploit innocent men, women and children, to understand sufficiently that we will be able to defend ourselves against the schemes. The foregoing Letter to the Registrar is an attempt to layer some visible flesh onto the Saint John's etheric skeleton. In his 13th Chapter, Saint John warned his posterity that another beast would ascend which would execute or nail down the supremacy of the original Beast which, for lack of an effective scheme, had so far been unable to convert all Men into virtually inanimate things, a conversion necessary to directly treat them as merchandise to be milked and traded in a commercial monopoly. Saint John predicted that the latter, irresistible scheme would persuade all Men to believe (worship) the idea that their very lives depended on their ability to buy and sell; to get a piece of the action of the only game in town! They might sense that the deck was stacked, but the deceptive tricks of the magicians who dealt their hands - being consummate lawyers and symbolaeographers, and dedicated servants of the Beast - were almost impossible to catch. John revealed the governing "trick" - in general terms: In order to buy and sell (and therefore not be killed by poverty), all men must agree to do one of two things. They must not object to being marked or branded as the Beast is marked. The Beast, being fictitious and having no real existence in nature or reality - but existing only in the minds of gullible men - is marked or branded by Nature Itself to be a fictitious thing. Begin a fictitious thing, the beast is marked with a pretend name... a mark that looks like a name, but really isn't. No beast can speak for itself, but only through lawyers and agents. The lawyers who administered the schemes of the second Beast, established the "law" which mandates that no natural person may buy or sell, or otherwise seek a profit, in his own Name. They define such activities as business; "Activity entered into with the intent of making a profit" - and require such persons to assume fictitious names for purposes related to business. IT IS THE FICTION which is the mark or brand Saint John warns against! It is the same NUMBER (measure) of what the Beast is; the precise level at which it resides in reality; it's status in relationship to every thing else - which is FICTIONAL. And in accordance with the Rule of English Grammar it is marked or represented, not by a capitalized name, but by a fictitious "name." Otherwise "natural persons" who wish to participate in the Beast-System (a worldwide commercial monopoly), and to buy the labor and souls of other men, while selling their own to the highest bidder must receive from the Beast (System), the privilege of using fictitious names. Only the managers of the scheme are required to know how the system functions. It is they who dictate the policies that keep it running smoothly; who provide for necessary adjustments and refinements to make the system ever more irresistible. Who determine among themselves what the short-term and long-term objectives will be. It is also incumbent on the pivotal lawyers - especially judges - to learn the deceptive principles which drive the system - so they will be able to suppress valid challenges to its supremacy. But it is requisite that members of the common herd be imprisoned in abject ignorance, never doubting that they are "free and self-sovereign individuals" who are in full control of their lives and families, and who can speak freely on any subject they choose, and worship whatever God their consciences dictate. And it is especially essential that the soldiers (policy-enforcement officers), who are required to suppress human activities which tend to undermine the monopoly business venture, be drawn from the least imaginative and sensitive humans. While they are chosen for their love of violence, and must exhibit physical bravery - only intellectual and spiritual cowards are eligible to become military, executorial, persons. The "Latter Beast" appeared in embryonic form barely 100 years ago. Since its advent, it has matured into the monolithic form we "see" today. Despite dire predictions of "an impending collapse of society as we know it today," the Beast (System) will not implode into itself. It will not self-destruct. It will continue on its course; growing ever powerful and irresistible. UNLESS IT MEETS AN IMMOVABLE OBJECT THAT IS DETERMINED TO VAPORIZE IT BACK INTO THE NOTHINGNESS FROM WHICH IT CAME! "The System" can be rocked on its axis if numerous real, live, flesh and blood people will act on relevant FACTS, instead of remaining paralyzed by delusions. "The System" cannot totally prevail except by its "legal process" of affecting individuals by persuading them to let themselves be directly affected by it. People "volunteer" by assuming that the fictitious names, held out so temptingly to them, require them to assume responsibility for everything done in the fictitious names. Before the fictitious name scheme became a universal syndrome, individuals could only be directly affected by due process of law which required a real, named person to accuse him of liability for an injury committed by the accused. The injury must have been committed in a particular NAMED venue; i.e. in a particular state and county. The controversy raised under oath by the accuser, would be tried and resolved in a particular NAMED court. The accusatory instrument was required to identify the natural person by his NAME. A typical accusatory instrument set out all the required names in its caption, like this: In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Marion County State of Oregon, ) vs. ) Criminal Complaint James Hazel ) Now, under the "Latter Beast System," ALL NAMES in accusatory instruments are fictitious: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION STATE OF OREGON ) VS. ) CRIMINAL JAMES HAZEL ) COMPLAINT In the final analysis, "government" can only affect you through an administrative or "judicial" accusation - demanding that you "appear" and "answer." Regardless of how many times in the past you have tacitly (albeit innocently and ignorantly) "acknowledged" a fictitious name, when you insist, your natural being can only be represented by a REAL CAPITALIZED NAME. Therefore, being addressed or even arrested by a fictitious name, which does not mark your natural being, there is nothing for you to answer. You simply say: "The accusation must be abated, it is void. My name is ("John Jones"; capital J, o, h, n; capital J, o, n, e, s ). The accused, 'JOHN JONES,' is not an alias; it is a fictitious name - and not mine." "Answered" thus, numerous times in fictitious courts and agencies which pollute the Land - the Latter Beast will begin to tremble... as does an evil man when death approaches. Appendix -More about Names "My" birth certificate, issued in Montana in 1937, reserved a box for "Full name of child," with no mention of "first, middle or last names." The form required entry of both the father's and mother's "color or race," indicating the subject of the certificate was the birth of a natural being. The birth certificate issued in Ohio in 1943, upon my wife's birth, reserved a box for "(CHILD) NAME," and provided spaces for "First," "Middle" and "Last." The form required entry of both the father's and mother's "COLOR OR RACE!" The birth certificate issued in Ohio in 1980, upon the birth of my youngest son, reserves a box for: "CHILD-NAME," with spaces for "First," "Middle" and "Last." The form has no box or space for the "color" or "race" of either parent. The birth certificate issued in Oregon in 1989, upon the birth of my grandson, reserves a box for "CHILD-NAME" with spaces for "First," "Middle" and "Last" - a form identical to that for "my son's" birth certificate; and like my son's, does not demand the color or race of the parents. There is nothing on "their" birth certificates to verify that the "CHILD-NAME(s)" entered on them, are the names for natural beings; born of parents having natural color or race. Another "curious" difference between the forms: The forms for myself, my wife, and youngest son, each require entry of "THE MOTHER'S MAIDEN NAME," and are disinterested in the mother's current name. But the form for my grandson (1989), requires entry of the mother's (current) name; with a separate box for "MAIDEN SURNAME." His is the only certificate which mentions "surname." The four foregoing examples demonstrate very disturbing changes in birth certificate forms implemented over several decades! A person's "Christian (christened) or given name" is his primary name. The so-called "middle name" is superfluous for all legal purposes. A "surname" is generally assumed to be a family name or the "patronymic." By legal definition, "surname" means "The last name; the name common to all members of a family." But technically, "surname" means a name "which is excessive, extreme; or over, beyond or above the given (christened) name." "Last" (regarding the Last Name entered on three of the foregoing birth certificates) means: "the only remaining part of a collection or sequence; most recent, latest; highest, greatest or utmost; most valid, authoritative or conclusive." The case is prima facie! As far as "the states"' functionaries are concerned, "your" name stands for a fictional thing intended for use in commerce. And as a fiction created by a "state," it (and you) are presumed subject to all of the regulations for commerce; including regulation and taxation. Let "the state" do what it wishes with the fictitious names it creates... until it equates one with YOU. Then, defend your real name, and your honor, and your self by every means at your command - as if your life and soul depends on it!

"TaxEaseForHire" <whydoesyourdogsniffmycrotch@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<Fu0Ta.9264$46.1892173@news2.telusplanet.net>... One word for Jimmy: RETARD TaxEase

On your word without substance?? Ha! Guess who's the retard.

Jimmy

"Jimmy" <jimmy_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:469f4ba8.0307200557.6d9ca3c1@posting.google.c om... Notes About Deceptive All Capitals Names What follows is a letter to the (Oregon) State Registrar of Vital Statistics. It appears to be a request for a particular directive, issued by the State Registrar to the various county registrars who prepare birth certificates. Don't be fooled by the appearances. The real purpose of the letter is for use as a forum to expose a vital truth about how men, women and children are legally converted into mere things; HUMAN RESOURCES and raw materials for exploitation to profit a relatively few beneficiaries of a perverted government monopoly. Whether or not the State Registrar fills my request is not important. It won't change the facts revealed in the letter. (I seldom ask questions of a bureaucrat when I don't know the answers in advance)! After the letter you will find reproductions of relevant parts of two different birth certificates: one issued in Ohio after the birth of my son, David, and the other issued in Oregon after the birth of my grandson, Andrew. They will help the reader visualize the fact that the "curious practice of mixing real names with fictitious names" is not unique to Oregon. As nearly as I can determine, it is practiced by preparers of birth certificates in all states. And it has been going on for at least 16 years - nationwide. Knowing that, you will also realize that the source of the command for such a "curious practice" is at the national, or even the international, level. The practice is systemic. [Editor; You can receive copies of the birth certificates from author James Hazel.] One other thing that is not made perfectly clear in the following letter is the fact that the "names" of "artificial persons," such as corporations and "assumed business names," are written in all UPPERCASE letters. Since they are fictional or fictitious "things," they require fictitious names. Don't confuse a fictitious name with an alias (alias dictus). "Alias" is when one is known by two or more different names. The term refers only to natural persons, not to artificial "persons." A natural person may be known by as many names as he chooses, for any lawful reason - or for no reason. For example: so long as he doesn't use different names with the intention to commit fraud, "James Smith" may lawfully also be known as "John Jones." An alias, being a name of a natural person, is always capitalized. To the contrary, "a fictitious name is a counterfeit, feigned or pretended name taken by a person, differing in some particular from his true name, with the implication that it is meant to deceive and mislead" (Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition). A fictitious name may be assumed by a natural person. But the "name" of an artificial "person" is ALWAYS a fictitious name, and every attorney will acknowledge that the names of artificial "persons" are always fictitious names. Real names are always capitalized, that is, the first letter of the name is capitalized, and the subsequent letters are written in lowercase. Fictitious names are generally written in all uppercase letters, so they can be distinguished from real names. It's common for typists to improperly write fictitious names in the same "style" as real names. Sometimes the error is driven by the writer's ignorance, but often it is motivated by an intent to deceive. The real name of our friend, John Smith is written (you guessed it!) "John Smith." "JOHN SMITH" on the other hand, is a fictitious name by virtue of the fact that it doesn't conform to the rule of grammar which requires capitalization of names. Except for absence of capitalization, it is spelled like our friend's name, and it sounds the same when spoken orally. But it's not the name for John Smith. The "name" is fictitious in and of itself, since it is not a real name. If John Smith were to examine the driver license in his wallet, and the Social Security card he holds, his old military I.D., and every card, check and statement related to his banking, he would discover that none of them are in his name. They all concern fictitious names! If that doesn't alarm John - wait until he learns that his children and grandchildren: those natural, beautiful flesh, blood and spirit fruits of his loins - bear fictitious names of THINGS; or "artificial persons!" James Hazel P.O. Box 863 Mount Angel OR 97362 December 11, 1995 Edward Johnson II, State Registrar of Vital Statistics P.O. Box 14050 Portland OR 97214-0050 Re: Forms for entries of names on birth certificates: REQUEST FOR COPY OF DIRECTIVE Dear Registrar Johnson: It recently came to my attention, while examining the birth certificate issued pursuant to the birth of my grandson (copy enclosed for your reference) that the data entered in the box reserved for "CHILD-NAME" is inconsistent. The "First and Middle" given, Christian names are properly capitalized in conformance with the rule of English grammar which governs the writing of names; i.e. "Names are always capitalized." But under the section reserved for the "Last" name, "HAZEL," in all uppercase letters, is entered. Obviously, "HAZEL" is not a name. Names for natural persons are, of course, always capitalized; that is, the initial letter of the word/name stands distinctly higher than the subsequent letters. Typically, when expressed in type, the initial letter is taken from the uppercase and the subsequent letters are taken from the lowercase. The result is that there can be no ambiguity or confusion as to whether a word is a name/proper noun or a common word or common noun. Artificial persons (which are actually contrived things that are endowed with a few of the legal powers and privileges of natural persons) are given fictitious names. It is fitting and appropriate that fictitious "persons," as legal fictions, should be given fictitious names to distinguish them from other fictional entities, and from natural persons. A person may apply to the CORPORATION DIVISION of the office of the SECRETARY OF STATE, for the establishment and registration of an ASSUMED BUSINESS NAME. The purpose of such a name is, of course, to enter into activity for the intention of making a profit. The "name" that is then established and registered is a fictitious name; not a real name. Since it does not conform with the rule of grammar which requires capitalization of names of persons, places and things, "HAZEL," as it appears on the birth certificate discussed herein - obviously intended to be assumed and taken as a family surname - is a fictitious name. Where the fictitious name (HAZEL) is entered into a box reserved for "CHILD-NAME," and mixed together in that box with the correctly-written given, Christian names for the child, the data in that box is inconsistent . It would seem to logically follow that, where one-third of the "names" in a "name context" or box is fictitious, all of the "names," taken together, are fictitious - sort of by the same principle that "one rotten apple will spoil the barrel" or "guilt by association." My concern is that, by some legal mechanism unknown to us, which has been executed against our interests without full disclosure to us, and without our knowledge and express or affirmative consent, we may have been converted into things, possibly to be used as merchandise for the profit or benefit of an unknown (to us) owner. If that is the case, it had to happen through our unknowing tacit consent. We would certainly never consider entering into such an arrangement voluntarily I have examined birth certificates issued over the past 15 years in other state jurisdictions, and have found the form of entry of "names" to be identical with that used on the birth certificate herein under discussion. I have talked with county registrars, who have advised me that they are required to use that form of entry under direction of the State Registrar. But none could or would provide me with a copy of such a directive. They referred me to your office for a copy of the directive. Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 333-11-016(2)(h) provides that: Unless otherwise directed by the state Registrar, no certificate shall be complete and correct and acceptable for registration: that contains improper or inconsistent data; - The Rule clearly provides that birth certificates may contain inconsistent data, such as inconsistent mixing of names with fictitious names, but only WHEN DIRECTED BY THE STATE REGISTRAR. Please provide me with a copy of your directive authorizing the mixing of name-forms on birth certificates. If no such directive has issued from your office, please provide me with the application for correcting of false information which appears on a birth certificate. Yours Truly, James Hazel Concluding Remarks In his Revelation, Saint John labored to describe a Beast which enslaved Men, and devoured their souls. He exposed the nature and mentality of the Beast's servants and supporters, of those who - like attorneys - spoke for the Beast; and those who executed its commands, and those lukewarm quislings who gave it their moral support - even at the cost of their children's lives. But Saint John wrote in highly symbolic terms - farfetched from the normal experiences of men. His intent may have been to save individuals from their baser instincts, and raise them to higher levels of consciousness - or to do the same for humanity as a whole... OR BOTH. The result was a Book, which however influential and powerful, is esoteric. His general revelations are profound, but lack the concrete details we need to understand the schemes the Beast's servants use to manipulate and exploit innocent men, women and children, to understand sufficiently that we will be able to defend ourselves against the schemes. The foregoing Letter to the Registrar is an attempt to layer some visible flesh onto the Saint John's etheric skeleton. In his 13th Chapter, Saint John warned his posterity that another beast would ascend which would execute or nail down the supremacy of the original Beast which, for lack of an effective scheme, had so far been unable to convert all Men into virtually inanimate things, a conversion necessary to directly treat them as merchandise to be milked and traded in a commercial monopoly. Saint John predicted that the latter, irresistible scheme would persuade all Men to believe (worship) the idea that their very lives depended on their ability to buy and sell; to get a piece of the action of the only game in town! They might sense that the deck was stacked, but the deceptive tricks of the magicians who dealt their hands - being consummate lawyers and symbolaeographers, and dedicated servants of the Beast - were almost impossible to catch. John revealed the governing "trick" - in general terms: In order to buy and sell (and therefore not be killed by poverty), all men must agree to do one of two things. They must not object to being marked or branded as the Beast is marked. The Beast, being fictitious and having no real existence in nature or reality - but existing only in the minds of gullible men - is marked or branded by Nature Itself to be a fictitious thing. Begin a fictitious thing, the beast is marked with a pretend name... a mark that looks like a name, but really isn't. No beast can speak for itself, but only through lawyers and agents. The lawyers who administered the schemes of the second Beast, established the "law" which mandates that no natural person may buy or sell, or otherwise seek a profit, in his own Name. They define such activities as business; "Activity entered into with the intent of making a profit" - and require such persons to assume fictitious names for purposes related to business. IT IS THE FICTION which is the mark or brand Saint John warns against! It is the same NUMBER (measure) of what the Beast is; the precise level at which it resides in reality; it's status in relationship to every thing else - which is FICTIONAL. And in accordance with the Rule of English Grammar it is marked or represented, not by a capitalized name, but by a fictitious "name." Otherwise "natural persons" who wish to participate in the Beast-System (a worldwide commercial monopoly), and to buy the labor and souls of other men, while selling their own to the highest bidder must receive from the Beast (System), the privilege of using fictitious names. Only the managers of the scheme are required to know how the system functions. It is they who dictate the policies that keep it running smoothly; who provide for necessary adjustments and refinements to make the system ever more irresistible. Who determine among themselves what the short-term and long-term objectives will be. It is also incumbent on the pivotal lawyers - especially judges - to learn the deceptive principles which drive the system - so they will be able to suppress valid challenges to its supremacy. But it is requisite that members of the common herd be imprisoned in abject ignorance, never doubting that they are "free and self-sovereign individuals" who are in full control of their lives and families, and who can speak freely on any subject they choose, and worship whatever God their consciences dictate. And it is especially essential that the soldiers (policy-enforcement officers), who are required to suppress human activities which tend to undermine the monopoly business venture, be drawn from the least imaginative and sensitive humans. While they are chosen for their love of violence, and must exhibit physical bravery - only intellectual and spiritual cowards are eligible to become military, executorial, persons. The "Latter Beast" appeared in embryonic form barely 100 years ago. Since its advent, it has matured into the monolithic form we "see" today. Despite dire predictions of "an impending collapse of society as we know it today," the Beast (System) will not implode into itself. It will not self-destruct. It will continue on its course; growing ever powerful and irresistible. UNLESS IT MEETS AN IMMOVABLE OBJECT THAT IS DETERMINED TO VAPORIZE IT BACK INTO THE NOTHINGNESS FROM WHICH IT CAME! "The System" can be rocked on its axis if numerous real, live, flesh and blood people will act on relevant FACTS, instead of remaining paralyzed by delusions. "The System" cannot totally prevail except by its "legal process" of affecting individuals by persuading them to let themselves be directly affected by it. People "volunteer" by assuming that the fictitious names, held out so temptingly to them, require them to assume responsibility for everything done in the fictitious names. Before the fictitious name scheme became a universal syndrome, individuals could only be directly affected by due process of law which required a real, named person to accuse him of liability for an injury committed by the accused. The injury must have been committed in a particular NAMED venue; i.e. in a particular state and county. The controversy raised under oath by the accuser, would be tried and resolved in a particular NAMED court. The accusatory instrument was required to identify the natural person by his NAME. A typical accusatory instrument set out all the required names in its caption, like this: In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Marion County State of Oregon, ) vs. ) Criminal Complaint James Hazel ) Now, under the "Latter Beast System," ALL NAMES in accusatory instruments are fictitious: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION STATE OF OREGON ) VS. ) CRIMINAL JAMES HAZEL ) COMPLAINT In the final analysis, "government" can only affect you through an administrative or "judicial" accusation - demanding that you "appear" and "answer." Regardless of how many times in the past you have tacitly (albeit innocently and ignorantly) "acknowledged" a fictitious name, when you insist, your natural being can only be represented by a REAL CAPITALIZED NAME. Therefore, being addressed or even arrested by a fictitious name, which does not mark your natural being, there is nothing for you to answer. You simply say: "The accusation must be abated, it is void. My name is ("John Jones"; capital J, o, h, n; capital J, o, n, e, s ). The accused, 'JOHN JONES,' is not an alias; it is a fictitious name - and not mine." "Answered" thus, numerous times in fictitious courts and agencies which pollute the Land - the Latter Beast will begin to tremble... as does an evil man when death approaches. Appendix -More about Names "My" birth certificate, issued in Montana in 1937, reserved a box for "Full name of child," with no mention of "first, middle or last names." The form required entry of both the father's and mother's "color or race," indicating the subject of the certificate was the birth of a natural being. The birth certificate issued in Ohio in 1943, upon my wife's birth, reserved a box for "(CHILD) NAME," and provided spaces for "First," "Middle" and "Last." The form required entry of both the father's and mother's "COLOR OR RACE!" The birth certificate issued in Ohio in 1980, upon the birth of my youngest son, reserves a box for: "CHILD-NAME," with spaces for "First," "Middle" and "Last." The form has no box or space for the "color" or "race" of either parent. The birth certificate issued in Oregon in 1989, upon the birth of my grandson, reserves a box for "CHILD-NAME" with spaces for "First," "Middle" and "Last" - a form identical to that for "my son's" birth certificate; and like my son's, does not demand the color or race of the parents. There is nothing on "their" birth certificates to verify that the "CHILD-NAME(s)" entered on them, are the names for natural beings; born of parents having natural color or race. Another "curious" difference between the forms: The forms for myself, my wife, and youngest son, each require entry of "THE MOTHER'S MAIDEN NAME," and are disinterested in the mother's current name. But the form for my grandson (1989), requires entry of the mother's (current) name; with a separate box for "MAIDEN SURNAME." His is the only certificate which mentions "surname." The four foregoing examples demonstrate very disturbing changes in birth certificate forms implemented over several decades! A person's "Christian (christened) or given name" is his primary name. The so-called "middle name" is superfluous for all legal purposes. A "surname" is generally assumed to be a family name or the "patronymic." By legal definition, "surname" means "The last name; the name common to all members of a family." But technically, "surname" means a name "which is excessive, extreme; or over, beyond or above the given (christened) name." "Last" (regarding the Last Name entered on three of the foregoing birth certificates) means: "the only remaining part of a collection or sequence; most recent, latest; highest, greatest or utmost; most valid, authoritative or conclusive." The case is prima facie! As far as "the states"' functionaries are concerned, "your" name stands for a fictional thing intended for use in commerce. And as a fiction created by a "state," it (and you) are presumed subject to all of the regulations for commerce; including regulation and taxation. Let "the state" do what it wishes with the fictitious names it creates... until it equates one with YOU. Then, defend your real name, and your honor, and your self by every means at your command - as if your life and soul depends on it!

Garbage arguments about conspiracies surrounding capital letters, or state
abbreviations, or state vs. State are not worthy of response. Anyone that wd
fall for that nonsense is in desperate need of psychiatric help. Same goes
for medical conspiracies and those who refuse to use the zip codes on
letters. Get help. SOON.
TaxEase

"Jimmy" <jimmy_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:469f4ba8.0307220544.2cc82180@posting.google.c om... "TaxEaseForHire" <whydoesyourdogsniffmycrotch@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:<Fu0Ta.9264$46.1892173@news2.telusplanet.net>... One word for Jimmy: RETARD TaxEase On your word without substance?? Ha! Guess who's the retard. Jimmy "Jimmy" <jimmy_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:469f4ba8.0307200557.6d9ca3c1@posting.google.c om... Notes About Deceptive All Capitals Names What follows is a letter to the (Oregon) State Registrar of Vital Statistics. It appears to be a request for a particular directive, issued by the State Registrar to the various county registrars who prepare birth certificates. Don't be fooled by the appearances. The real purpose of the letter is for use as a forum to expose a vital truth about how men, women and children are legally converted into mere things; HUMAN RESOURCES and raw materials for exploitation to profit a relatively few beneficiaries of a perverted government monopoly. Whether or not the State Registrar fills my request is not important. It won't change the facts revealed in the letter. (I seldom ask questions of a bureaucrat when I don't know the answers in advance)! After the letter you will find reproductions of relevant parts of two different birth certificates: one issued in Ohio after the birth of my son, David, and the other issued in Oregon after the birth of my grandson, Andrew. They will help the reader visualize the fact that the "curious practice of mixing real names with fictitious names" is not unique to Oregon. As nearly as I can determine, it is practiced by preparers of birth certificates in all states. And it has been going on for at least 16 years - nationwide. Knowing that, you will also realize that the source of the command for such a "curious practice" is at the national, or even the international, level. The practice is systemic. [Editor; You can receive copies of the birth certificates from author James Hazel.] One other thing that is not made perfectly clear in the following letter is the fact that the "names" of "artificial persons," such as corporations and "assumed business names," are written in all UPPERCASE letters. Since they are fictional or fictitious "things," they require fictitious names. Don't confuse a fictitious name with an alias (alias dictus). "Alias" is when one is known by two or more different names. The term refers only to natural persons, not to artificial "persons." A natural person may be known by as many names as he chooses, for any lawful reason - or for no reason. For example: so long as he doesn't use different names with the intention to commit fraud, "James Smith" may lawfully also be known as "John Jones." An alias, being a name of a natural person, is always capitalized. To the contrary, "a fictitious name is a counterfeit, feigned or pretended name taken by a person, differing in some particular from his true name, with the implication that it is meant to deceive and mislead" (Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition). A fictitious name may be assumed by a natural person. But the "name" of an artificial "person" is ALWAYS a fictitious name, and every attorney will acknowledge that the names of artificial "persons" are always fictitious names. Real names are always capitalized, that is, the first letter of the name is capitalized, and the subsequent letters are written in lowercase. Fictitious names are generally written in all uppercase letters, so they can be distinguished from real names. It's common for typists to improperly write fictitious names in the same "style" as real names. Sometimes the error is driven by the writer's ignorance, but often it is motivated by an intent to deceive. The real name of our friend, John Smith is written (you guessed it!) "John Smith." "JOHN SMITH" on the other hand, is a fictitious name by virtue of the fact that it doesn't conform to the rule of grammar which requires capitalization of names. Except for absence of capitalization, it is spelled like our friend's name, and it sounds the same when spoken orally. But it's not the name for John Smith. The "name" is fictitious in and of itself, since it is not a real name. If John Smith were to examine the driver license in his wallet, and the Social Security card he holds, his old military I.D., and every card, check and statement related to his banking, he would discover that none of them are in his name. They all concern fictitious names! If that doesn't alarm John - wait until he learns that his children and grandchildren: those natural, beautiful flesh, blood and spirit fruits of his loins - bear fictitious names of THINGS; or "artificial persons!" James Hazel P.O. Box 863 Mount Angel OR 97362 December 11, 1995 Edward Johnson II, State Registrar of Vital Statistics P.O. Box 14050 Portland OR 97214-0050 Re: Forms for entries of names on birth certificates: REQUEST FOR COPY OF DIRECTIVE Dear Registrar Johnson: It recently came to my attention, while examining the birth certificate issued pursuant to the birth of my grandson (copy enclosed for your reference) that the data entered in the box reserved for "CHILD-NAME" is inconsistent. The "First and Middle" given, Christian names are properly capitalized in conformance with the rule of English grammar which governs the writing of names; i.e. "Names are always capitalized." But under the section reserved for the "Last" name, "HAZEL," in all uppercase letters, is entered. Obviously, "HAZEL" is not a name. Names for natural persons are, of course, always capitalized; that is, the initial letter of the word/name stands distinctly higher than the subsequent letters. Typically, when expressed in type, the initial letter is taken from the uppercase and the subsequent letters are taken from the lowercase. The result is that there can be no ambiguity or confusion as to whether a word is a name/proper noun or a common word or common noun. Artificial persons (which are actually contrived things that are endowed with a few of the legal powers and privileges of natural persons) are given fictitious names. It is fitting and appropriate that fictitious "persons," as legal fictions, should be given fictitious names to distinguish them from other fictional entities, and from natural persons. A person may apply to the CORPORATION DIVISION of the office of the SECRETARY OF STATE, for the establishment and registration of an ASSUMED BUSINESS NAME. The purpose of such a name is, of course, to enter into activity for the intention of making a profit. The "name" that is then established and registered is a fictitious name; not a real name. Since it does not conform with the rule of grammar which requires capitalization of names of persons, places and things, "HAZEL," as it appears on the birth certificate discussed herein - obviously intended to be assumed and taken as a family surname - is a fictitious name. Where the fictitious name (HAZEL) is entered into a box reserved for "CHILD-NAME," and mixed together in that box with the correctly-written given, Christian names for the child, the data in that box is inconsistent . It would seem to logically follow that, where one-third of the "names" in a "name context" or box is fictitious, all of the "names," taken together, are fictitious - sort of by the same principle that "one rotten apple will spoil the barrel" or "guilt by association." My concern is that, by some legal mechanism unknown to us, which has been executed against our interests without full disclosure to us, and without our knowledge and express or affirmative consent, we may have been converted into things, possibly to be used as merchandise for the profit or benefit of an unknown (to us) owner. If that is the case, it had to happen through our unknowing tacit consent. We would certainly never consider entering into such an arrangement voluntarily I have examined birth certificates issued over the past 15 years in other state jurisdictions, and have found the form of entry of "names" to be identical with that used on the birth certificate herein under discussion. I have talked with county registrars, who have advised me that they are required to use that form of entry under direction of the State Registrar. But none could or would provide me with a copy of such a directive. They referred me to your office for a copy of the directive. Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 333-11-016(2)(h) provides that: Unless otherwise directed by the state Registrar, no certificate shall be complete and correct and acceptable for registration: that contains improper or inconsistent data; - The Rule clearly provides that birth certificates may contain inconsistent data, such as inconsistent mixing of names with fictitious names, but only WHEN DIRECTED BY THE STATE REGISTRAR. Please provide me with a copy of your directive authorizing the mixing of name-forms on birth certificates. If no such directive has issued from your office, please provide me with the application for correcting of false information which appears on a birth certificate. Yours Truly, James Hazel Concluding Remarks In his Revelation, Saint John labored to describe a Beast which enslaved Men, and devoured their souls. He exposed the nature and mentality of the Beast's servants and supporters, of those who - like attorneys - spoke for the Beast; and those who executed its commands, and those lukewarm quislings who gave it their moral support - even at the cost of their children's lives. But Saint John wrote in highly symbolic terms - farfetched from the normal experiences of men. His intent may have been to save individuals from their baser instincts, and raise them to higher levels of consciousness - or to do the same for humanity as a whole... OR BOTH. The result was a Book, which however influential and powerful, is esoteric. His general revelations are profound, but lack the concrete details we need to understand the schemes the Beast's servants use to manipulate and exploit innocent men, women and children, to understand sufficiently that we will be able to defend ourselves against the schemes. The foregoing Letter to the Registrar is an attempt to layer some visible flesh onto the Saint John's etheric skeleton. In his 13th Chapter, Saint John warned his posterity that another beast would ascend which would execute or nail down the supremacy of the original Beast which, for lack of an effective scheme, had so far been unable to convert all Men into virtually inanimate things, a conversion necessary to directly treat them as merchandise to be milked and traded in a commercial monopoly. Saint John predicted that the latter, irresistible scheme would persuade all Men to believe (worship) the idea that their very lives depended on their ability to buy and sell; to get a piece of the action of the only game in town! They might sense that the deck was stacked, but the deceptive tricks of the magicians who dealt their hands - being consummate lawyers and symbolaeographers, and dedicated servants of the Beast - were almost impossible to catch. John revealed the governing "trick" - in general terms: In order to buy and sell (and therefore not be killed by poverty), all men must agree to do one of two things. They must not object to being marked or branded as the Beast is marked. The Beast, being fictitious and having no real existence in nature or reality - but existing only in the minds of gullible men - is marked or branded by Nature Itself to be a fictitious thing. Begin a fictitious thing, the beast is marked with a pretend name... a mark that looks like a name, but really isn't. No beast can speak for itself, but only through lawyers and agents. The lawyers who administered the schemes of the second Beast, established the "law" which mandates that no natural person may buy or sell, or otherwise seek a profit, in his own Name. They define such activities as business; "Activity entered into with the intent of making a profit" - and require such persons to assume fictitious names for purposes related to business. IT IS THE FICTION which is the mark or brand Saint John warns against! It is the same NUMBER (measure) of what the Beast is; the precise level at which it resides in reality; it's status in relationship to every thing else - which is FICTIONAL. And in accordance with the Rule of English Grammar it is marked or represented, not by a capitalized name, but by a fictitious "name." Otherwise "natural persons" who wish to participate in the Beast-System (a worldwide commercial monopoly), and to buy the labor and souls of other men, while selling their own to the highest bidder must receive from the Beast (System), the privilege of using fictitious names. Only the managers of the scheme are required to know how the system functions. It is they who dictate the policies that keep it running smoothly; who provide for necessary adjustments and refinements to make the system ever more irresistible. Who determine among themselves what the short-term and long-term objectives will be. It is also incumbent on the pivotal lawyers - especially judges - to learn the deceptive principles which drive the system - so they will be able to suppress valid challenges to its supremacy. But it is requisite that members of the common herd be imprisoned in abject ignorance, never doubting that they are "free and self-sovereign individuals" who are in full control of their lives and families, and who can speak freely on any subject they choose, and worship whatever God their consciences dictate. And it is especially essential that the soldiers (policy-enforcement officers), who are required to suppress human activities which tend to undermine the monopoly business venture, be drawn from the least imaginative and sensitive humans. While they are chosen for their love of violence, and must exhibit physical bravery - only intellectual and spiritual cowards are eligible to become military, executorial, persons. The "Latter Beast" appeared in embryonic form barely 100 years ago. Since its advent, it has matured into the monolithic form we "see" today. Despite dire predictions of "an impending collapse of society as we know it today," the Beast (System) will not implode into itself. It will not self-destruct. It will continue on its course; growing ever powerful and irresistible. UNLESS IT MEETS AN IMMOVABLE OBJECT THAT IS DETERMINED TO VAPORIZE IT BACK INTO THE NOTHINGNESS FROM WHICH IT CAME! "The System" can be rocked on its axis if numerous real, live, flesh and blood people will act on relevant FACTS, instead of remaining paralyzed by delusions. "The System" cannot totally prevail except by its "legal process" of affecting individuals by persuading them to let themselves be directly affected by it. People "volunteer" by assuming that the fictitious names, held out so temptingly to them, require them to assume responsibility for everything done in the fictitious names. Before the fictitious name scheme became a universal syndrome, individuals could only be directly affected by due process of law which required a real, named person to accuse him of liability for an injury committed by the accused. The injury must have been committed in a particular NAMED venue; i.e. in a particular state and county. The controversy raised under oath by the accuser, would be tried and resolved in a particular NAMED court. The accusatory instrument was required to identify the natural person by his NAME. A typical accusatory instrument set out all the required names in its caption, like this: In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Marion County State of Oregon, ) vs. ) Criminal Complaint James Hazel ) Now, under the "Latter Beast System," ALL NAMES in accusatory instruments are fictitious: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION STATE OF OREGON ) VS. ) CRIMINAL JAMES HAZEL ) COMPLAINT In the final analysis, "government" can only affect you through an administrative or "judicial" accusation - demanding that you "appear" and "answer." Regardless of how many times in the past you have tacitly (albeit innocently and ignorantly) "acknowledged" a fictitious name, when you insist, your natural being can only be represented by a REAL CAPITALIZED NAME. Therefore, being addressed or even arrested by a fictitious name, which does not mark your natural being, there is nothing for you to answer. You simply say: "The accusation must be abated, it is void. My name is ("John Jones"; capital J, o, h, n; capital J, o, n, e, s ). The accused, 'JOHN JONES,' is not an alias; it is a fictitious name - and not mine." "Answered" thus, numerous times in fictitious courts and agencies which pollute the Land - the Latter Beast will begin to tremble... as does an evil man when death approaches. Appendix -More about Names "My" birth certificate, issued in Montana in 1937, reserved a box for "Full name of child," with no mention of "first, middle or last names." The form required entry of both the father's and mother's "color or race," indicating the subject of the certificate was the birth of a natural being. The birth certificate issued in Ohio in 1943, upon my wife's birth, reserved a box for "(CHILD) NAME," and provided spaces for "First," "Middle" and "Last." The form required entry of both the father's and mother's "COLOR OR RACE!" The birth certificate issued in Ohio in 1980, upon the birth of my youngest son, reserves a box for: "CHILD-NAME," with spaces for "First," "Middle" and "Last." The form has no box or space for the "color" or "race" of either parent. The birth certificate issued in Oregon in 1989, upon the birth of my grandson, reserves a box for "CHILD-NAME" with spaces for "First," "Middle" and "Last" - a form identical to that for "my son's" birth certificate; and like my son's, does not demand the color or race of the parents. There is nothing on "their" birth certificates to verify that the "CHILD-NAME(s)" entered on them, are the names for natural beings; born of parents having natural color or race. Another "curious" difference between the forms: The forms for myself, my wife, and youngest son, each require entry of "THE MOTHER'S MAIDEN NAME," and are disinterested in the mother's current name. But the form for my grandson (1989), requires entry of the mother's (current) name; with a separate box for "MAIDEN SURNAME." His is the only certificate which mentions "surname." The four foregoing examples demonstrate very disturbing changes in birth certificate forms implemented over several decades! A person's "Christian (christened) or given name" is his primary name. The so-called "middle name" is superfluous for all legal purposes. A "surname" is generally assumed to be a family name or the "patronymic." By legal definition, "surname" means "The last name; the name common to all members of a family." But technically, "surname" means a name "which is excessive, extreme; or over, beyond or above the given (christened) name." "Last" (regarding the Last Name entered on three of the foregoing birth certificates) means: "the only remaining part of a collection or sequence; most recent, latest; highest, greatest or utmost; most valid, authoritative or conclusive." The case is prima facie! As far as "the states"' functionaries are concerned, "your" name stands for a fictional thing intended for use in commerce. And as a fiction created by a "state," it (and you) are presumed subject to all of the regulations for commerce; including regulation and taxation. Let "the state" do what it wishes with the fictitious names it creates... until it equates one with YOU. Then, defend your real name, and your honor, and your self by every means at your command - as if your life and soul depends on it!

"TaxEaseForHire" <whydoesyourdogsniffmycrotch@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<0UETa.26449$xn5.4415762@news0.telusplanet.net>... Garbage arguments about conspiracies surrounding capital letters, or state abbreviations, or state vs. State are not worthy of response. Anyone that wd fall for that nonsense is in desperate need of psychiatric help. Same goes for medical conspiracies and those who refuse to use the zip codes on letters. Get help. SOON. TaxEase

There you have it folks. TaxEase doesn't believe grammer and proper
spelling make any difference in law. Guess that makes things real easy
for him, eh "TaxEase"ForHire?

Jimmy

"Jimmy" <jimmy_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:469f4ba8.0307220544.2cc82180@posting.google.c om... "TaxEaseForHire" <whydoesyourdogsniffmycrotch@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<Fu0Ta.9264$46.1892173@news2.telusplanet.net>... One word for Jimmy: RETARD TaxEase On your word without substance?? Ha! Guess who's the retard. Jimmy "Jimmy" <jimmy_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:469f4ba8.0307200557.6d9ca3c1@posting.google.c om... > Notes About Deceptive All Capitals Names > > What follows is a letter to the (Oregon) State Registrar of Vital > Statistics. It appears to be a request for a particular directive, > issued by the State Registrar to the various county registrars who > prepare birth certificates. Don't be fooled by the appearances. The > real purpose of the letter is for use as a forum to expose a vital > truth about how men, women and children are legally converted into > mere things; HUMAN RESOURCES and raw materials for exploitation to > profit a relatively few beneficiaries of a perverted government > monopoly. Whether or not the State Registrar fills my request is not > important. It won't change the facts revealed in the letter. (I seldom > ask questions of a bureaucrat when I don't know the answers in > advance)! > After the letter you will find reproductions of relevant parts of two > different birth certificates: one issued in Ohio after the birth of my > son, David, and the other issued in Oregon after the birth of my > grandson, Andrew. They will help the reader visualize the fact that > the "curious practice of mixing real names with fictitious names" is > not unique to Oregon. As nearly as I can determine, it is practiced by > preparers of birth certificates in all states. And it has been going > on for at least 16 years - nationwide. Knowing that, you will also > realize that the source of the command for such a "curious practice" > is at the national, or even the international, level. The practice is > systemic. [Editor; You can receive copies of the birth certificates > from author James Hazel.] > One other thing that is not made perfectly clear in the following > letter is the fact that the "names" of "artificial persons," such as > corporations and "assumed business names," are written in all > UPPERCASE letters. Since they are fictional or fictitious "things," > they require fictitious names. Don't confuse a fictitious name with an > alias (alias dictus). > "Alias" is when one is known by two or more different names. The term > refers only to natural persons, not to artificial "persons." A natural > person may be known by as many names as he chooses, for any lawful > reason - or for no reason. For example: so long as he doesn't use > different names with the intention to commit fraud, "James Smith" may > lawfully also be known as "John Jones." An alias, being a name of a > natural person, is always capitalized. > To the contrary, "a fictitious name is a counterfeit, feigned or > pretended name taken by a person, differing in some particular from > his true name, with the implication that it is meant to deceive and > mislead" (Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition). > A fictitious name may be assumed by a natural person. But the "name" > of an artificial "person" is ALWAYS a fictitious name, and every > attorney will acknowledge that the names of artificial "persons" are > always fictitious names. > Real names are always capitalized, that is, the first letter of the > name is capitalized, and the subsequent letters are written in > lowercase. Fictitious names are generally written in all uppercase > letters, so they can be distinguished from real names. It's common for > typists to improperly write fictitious names in the same "style" as > real names. Sometimes the error is driven by the writer's ignorance, > but often it is motivated by an intent to deceive. > The real name of our friend, John Smith is written (you guessed it!) > "John Smith." "JOHN SMITH" on the other hand, is a fictitious name by > virtue of the fact that it doesn't conform to the rule of grammar > which requires capitalization of names. Except for absence of > capitalization, it is spelled like our friend's name, and it sounds > the same when spoken orally. But it's not the name for John Smith. The > "name" is fictitious in and of itself, since it is not a real name. > If John Smith were to examine the driver license in his wallet, and > the Social Security card he holds, his old military I.D., and every > card, check and statement related to his banking, he would discover > that none of them are in his name. They all concern fictitious names! > If that doesn't alarm John - wait until he learns that his children > and grandchildren: those natural, beautiful flesh, blood and spirit > fruits of his loins - bear fictitious names of THINGS; or "artificial > persons!" > James Hazel > P.O. Box 863 > Mount Angel OR 97362 > December 11, 1995 > Edward Johnson II, > State Registrar of Vital Statistics > P.O. Box 14050 > Portland OR 97214-0050 > Re: Forms for entries of names on birth certificates: REQUEST FOR COPY > OF DIRECTIVE > Dear Registrar Johnson: > > It recently came to my attention, while examining the birth > certificate issued pursuant to the birth of my grandson (copy enclosed > for your reference) that the data entered in the box reserved for > "CHILD-NAME" is inconsistent. The "First and Middle" given, Christian > names are properly capitalized in conformance with the rule of English > grammar which governs the writing of names; i.e. "Names are always > capitalized." But under the section reserved for the "Last" name, > "HAZEL," in all uppercase letters, is entered. > Obviously, "HAZEL" is not a name. > Names for natural persons are, of course, always capitalized; that is, > the initial letter of the word/name stands distinctly higher than the > subsequent letters. Typically, when expressed in type, the initial > letter is taken from the uppercase and the subsequent letters are > taken from the lowercase. The result is that there can be no ambiguity > or confusion as to whether a word is a name/proper noun or a common > word or common noun. > Artificial persons (which are actually contrived things that are > endowed with a few of the legal powers and privileges of natural > persons) are given fictitious names. It is fitting and appropriate > that fictitious "persons," as legal fictions, should be given > fictitious names to distinguish them from other fictional entities, > and from natural persons. > A person may apply to the CORPORATION DIVISION of the office of the > SECRETARY OF STATE, for the establishment and registration of an > ASSUMED BUSINESS NAME. The purpose of such a name is, of course, to > enter into activity for the intention of making a profit. The "name" > that is then established and registered is a fictitious name; not a > real name. > Since it does not conform with the rule of grammar which requires > capitalization of names of persons, places and things, "HAZEL," as it > appears on the birth certificate discussed herein - obviously intended > to be assumed and taken as a family surname - is a fictitious name. > Where the fictitious name (HAZEL) is entered into a box reserved for > "CHILD-NAME," and mixed together in that box with the > correctly-written given, Christian names for the child, the data in > that box is inconsistent . > It would seem to logically follow that, where one-third of the "names" > in a "name context" or box is fictitious, all of the "names," taken > together, are fictitious - sort of by the same principle that "one > rotten apple will spoil the barrel" or "guilt by association." > My concern is that, by some legal mechanism unknown to us, which has > been executed against our interests without full disclosure to us, and > without our knowledge and express or affirmative consent, we may have > been converted into things, possibly to be used as merchandise for the > profit or benefit of an unknown (to us) owner. If that is the case, it > had to happen through our unknowing tacit consent. We would certainly > never consider entering into such an arrangement voluntarily > I have examined birth certificates issued over the past 15 years in > other state jurisdictions, and have found the form of entry of "names" > to be identical with that used on the birth certificate herein under > discussion. > I have talked with county registrars, who have advised me that they > are required to use that form of entry under direction of the State > Registrar. But none could or would provide me with a copy of such a > directive. They referred me to your office for a copy of the > directive. > Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 333-11-016(2)(h) provides that: > Unless otherwise directed by the state Registrar, no certificate shall > be complete and correct and acceptable for registration: that contains > improper or inconsistent data; - > The Rule clearly provides that birth certificates may contain > inconsistent data, such as inconsistent mixing of names with > fictitious names, but only WHEN DIRECTED BY THE STATE REGISTRAR. > Please provide me with a copy of your directive authorizing the mixing > of name-forms on birth certificates. If no such directive has issued > from your office, please provide me with the application for > correcting of false information which appears on a birth certificate. > Yours Truly, > James Hazel > Concluding Remarks > In his Revelation, Saint John labored to describe a Beast which > enslaved Men, and devoured their souls. He exposed the nature and > mentality of the Beast's servants and supporters, of those who - like > attorneys - spoke for the Beast; and those who executed its commands, > and those lukewarm quislings who gave it their moral support - even at > the cost of their children's lives. But Saint John wrote in highly > symbolic terms - farfetched from the normal experiences of men. His > intent may have been to save individuals from their baser instincts, > and raise them to higher levels of consciousness - or to do the same > for humanity as a whole... OR BOTH. The result was a Book, which > however influential and powerful, is esoteric. His general revelations > are profound, but lack the concrete details we need to understand the > schemes the Beast's servants use to manipulate and exploit innocent > men, women and children, to understand sufficiently that we will be > able to defend ourselves against the schemes. > The foregoing Letter to the Registrar is an attempt to layer some > visible flesh onto the Saint John's etheric skeleton. > In his 13th Chapter, Saint John warned his posterity that another > beast would ascend which would execute or nail down the supremacy of > the original Beast which, for lack of an effective scheme, had so far > been unable to convert all Men into virtually inanimate things, a > conversion necessary to directly treat them as merchandise to be > milked and traded in a commercial monopoly. > Saint John predicted that the latter, irresistible scheme would > persuade all Men to believe (worship) the idea that their very lives > depended on their ability to buy and sell; to get a piece of the > action of the only game in town! They might sense that the deck was > stacked, but the deceptive tricks of the magicians who dealt their > hands - being consummate lawyers and symbolaeographers, and dedicated > servants of the Beast - were almost impossible to catch. John revealed > the governing "trick" - in general terms: In order to buy and sell > (and therefore not be killed by poverty), all men must agree to do one > of two things. They must not object to being marked or branded as the > Beast is marked. The Beast, being fictitious and having no real > existence in nature or reality - but existing only in the minds of > gullible men - is marked or branded by Nature Itself to be a > fictitious thing. Begin a fictitious thing, the beast is marked with a > pretend name... a mark that looks like a name, but really isn't. > No beast can speak for itself, but only through lawyers and agents. > The lawyers who administered the schemes of the second Beast, > established the "law" which mandates that no natural person may buy or > sell, or otherwise seek a profit, in his own Name. They define such > activities as business; "Activity entered into with the intent of > making a profit" - and require such persons to assume fictitious names > for purposes related to business. IT IS THE FICTION which is the mark > or brand Saint John warns against! It is the same NUMBER (measure) of > what the Beast is; the precise level at which it resides in reality; > it's status in relationship to every thing else - which is FICTIONAL. > And in accordance with the Rule of English Grammar it is marked or > represented, not by a capitalized name, but by a fictitious "name." > Otherwise "natural persons" who wish to participate in the > Beast-System (a worldwide commercial monopoly), and to buy the labor > and souls of other men, while selling their own to the highest bidder > must receive from the Beast (System), the privilege of using > fictitious names. > Only the managers of the scheme are required to know how the system > functions. It is they who dictate the policies that keep it running > smoothly; who provide for necessary adjustments and refinements to > make the system ever more irresistible. Who determine among themselves > what the short-term and long-term objectives will be. > It is also incumbent on the pivotal lawyers - especially judges - to > learn the deceptive principles which drive the system - so they will > be able to suppress valid challenges to its supremacy. > But it is requisite that members of the common herd be imprisoned in > abject ignorance, never doubting that they are "free and > self-sovereign individuals" who are in full control of their lives and > families, and who can speak freely on any subject they choose, and > worship whatever God their consciences dictate. > And it is especially essential that the soldiers (policy-enforcement > officers), who are required to suppress human activities which tend to > undermine the monopoly business venture, be drawn from the least > imaginative and sensitive humans. While they are chosen for their love > of violence, and must exhibit physical bravery - only intellectual and > spiritual cowards are eligible to become military, executorial, > persons. > The "Latter Beast" appeared in embryonic form barely 100 years ago. > Since its advent, it has matured into the monolithic form we "see" > today. Despite dire predictions of "an impending collapse of society > as we know it today," the Beast (System) will not implode into itself. > It will not self-destruct. It will continue on its course; growing > ever powerful and irresistible. UNLESS IT MEETS AN IMMOVABLE OBJECT > THAT IS DETERMINED TO VAPORIZE IT BACK INTO THE NOTHINGNESS FROM WHICH > IT CAME! > "The System" can be rocked on its axis if numerous real, live, flesh > and blood people will act on relevant FACTS, instead of remaining > paralyzed by delusions. > "The System" cannot totally prevail except by its "legal process" of > affecting individuals by persuading them to let themselves be directly > affected by it. People "volunteer" by assuming that the fictitious > names, held out so temptingly to them, require them to assume > responsibility for everything done in the fictitious names. > Before the fictitious name scheme became a universal syndrome, > individuals could only be directly affected by due process of law > which required a real, named person to accuse him of liability for an > injury committed by the accused. The injury must have been committed > in a particular NAMED venue; i.e. in a particular state and county. > The controversy raised under oath by the accuser, would be tried and > resolved in a particular NAMED court. The accusatory instrument was > required to identify the natural person by his NAME. A typical > accusatory instrument set out all the required names in its caption, > like this: > In the Circuit Court of the State > of Oregon for Marion County > State of Oregon, ) > vs. ) Criminal Complaint > James Hazel ) > Now, under the "Latter Beast System," ALL NAMES in accusatory > instruments are fictitious: > IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION > STATE OF OREGON ) > VS. ) CRIMINAL > JAMES HAZEL ) COMPLAINT > In the final analysis, "government" can only affect you through an > administrative or "judicial" accusation - demanding that you "appear" > and "answer." Regardless of how many times in the past you have > tacitly (albeit innocently and ignorantly) "acknowledged" a fictitious > name, when you insist, your natural being can only be represented by a > REAL CAPITALIZED NAME. Therefore, being addressed or even arrested by > a fictitious name, which does not mark your natural being, there is > nothing for you to answer. You simply say: "The accusation must be > abated, it is void. My name is ("John Jones"; capital J, o, h, n; > capital J, o, n, e, s ). The accused, 'JOHN JONES,' is not an alias; > it is a fictitious name - and not mine." > "Answered" thus, numerous times in fictitious courts and agencies > which pollute the Land - the Latter Beast will begin to tremble... as > does an evil man when death approaches. > Appendix -More about Names > > "My" birth certificate, issued in Montana in 1937, reserved a box for > "Full name of child," with no mention of "first, middle or last > names." The form required entry of both the father's and mother's > "color or race," indicating the subject of the certificate was the > birth of a natural being. > The birth certificate issued in Ohio in 1943, upon my wife's birth, > reserved a box for "(CHILD) NAME," and provided spaces for "First," > "Middle" and "Last." The form required entry of both the father's and > mother's "COLOR OR RACE!" > The birth certificate issued in Ohio in 1980, upon the birth of my > youngest son, reserves a box for: "CHILD-NAME," with spaces for > "First," "Middle" and "Last." The form has no box or space for the > "color" or "race" of either parent. > The birth certificate issued in Oregon in 1989, upon the birth of my > grandson, reserves a box for "CHILD-NAME" with spaces for "First," > "Middle" and "Last" - a form identical to that for "my son's" birth > certificate; and like my son's, does not demand the color or race of > the parents. There is nothing on "their" birth certificates to verify > that the "CHILD-NAME(s)" entered on them, are the names for natural > beings; born of parents having natural color or race. > Another "curious" difference between the forms: The forms for myself, > my wife, and youngest son, each require entry of "THE MOTHER'S MAIDEN > NAME," and are disinterested in the mother's current name. But the > form for my grandson (1989), requires entry of the mother's (current) > name; with a separate box for "MAIDEN SURNAME." His is the only > certificate which mentions "surname." > The four foregoing examples demonstrate very disturbing changes in > birth certificate forms implemented over several decades! > A person's "Christian (christened) or given name" is his primary name. > The so-called "middle name" is superfluous for all legal purposes. A > "surname" is generally assumed to be a family name or the > "patronymic." By legal definition, "surname" means "The last name; the > name common to all members of a family." But technically, "surname" > means a name "which is excessive, extreme; or over, beyond or above > the given (christened) name." > "Last" (regarding the Last Name entered on three of the foregoing > birth certificates) means: "the only remaining part of a collection or > sequence; most recent, latest; highest, greatest or utmost; most > valid, authoritative or conclusive." > The case is prima facie! As far as "the states"' functionaries are > concerned, "your" name stands for a fictional thing intended for use > in commerce. And as a fiction created by a "state," it (and you) are > presumed subject to all of the regulations for commerce; including > regulation and taxation. > Let "the state" do what it wishes with the fictitious names it > creates... until it equates one with YOU. Then, defend your real name, > and your honor, and your self by every means at your command - as if > your life and soul depends on it!

Jimmy, do you really think that the use of capitals changes the SPELLING of
a word? Did you finish, even, elementary? Does it make any difference if I
say stuff yourself, or STUFF YOURSELF? It really doesn't matter, as long as
you do as I am suggesting.
But seriously folks... upper case, lower case, that doesn't affect GRAMMAR
(or grammar, just for Jimmy, or jimmy, or JIMMY, or JiMmY, or whatever) or
spelling. We ALL know that, except for the said Jimmy, JiMMy, etc.
There are, of course, remedial English classes available at your local
college (a.k.a. high school, if you are in Canada).
TaxEase

"Jimmy" <jimmy_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:469f4ba8.0307240433.48ec20b0@posting.google.c om... "TaxEaseForHire" <whydoesyourdogsniffmycrotch@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:<0UETa.26449$xn5.4415762@news0.telusplanet.net>... Garbage arguments about conspiracies surrounding capital letters, or
state abbreviations, or state vs. State are not worthy of response. Anyone
that wd fall for that nonsense is in desperate need of psychiatric help. Same
goes for medical conspiracies and those who refuse to use the zip codes on letters. Get help. SOON. TaxEase There you have it folks. TaxEase doesn't believe grammer and proper spelling make any difference in law. Guess that makes things real easy for him, eh "TaxEase"ForHire? Jimmy "Jimmy" <jimmy_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:469f4ba8.0307220544.2cc82180@posting.google.c om... "TaxEaseForHire" <whydoesyourdogsniffmycrotch@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<Fu0Ta.9264$46.1892173@news2.telusplanet.net>... > One word for Jimmy: RETARD > TaxEase On your word without substance?? Ha! Guess who's the retard. Jimmy > > "Jimmy" <jimmy_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:469f4ba8.0307200557.6d9ca3c1@posting.google.c om... > > Notes About Deceptive All Capitals Names > > > > What follows is a letter to the (Oregon) State Registrar of Vital > > Statistics. It appears to be a request for a particular directive, > > issued by the State Registrar to the various county registrars who > > prepare birth certificates. Don't be fooled by the appearances.
The > > real purpose of the letter is for use as a forum to expose a vital > > truth about how men, women and children are legally converted into > > mere things; HUMAN RESOURCES and raw materials for exploitation to > > profit a relatively few beneficiaries of a perverted government > > monopoly. Whether or not the State Registrar fills my request is
not > > important. It won't change the facts revealed in the letter. (I
seldom > > ask questions of a bureaucrat when I don't know the answers in > > advance)! > > After the letter you will find reproductions of relevant parts of
two > > different birth certificates: one issued in Ohio after the birth
of my > > son, David, and the other issued in Oregon after the birth of my > > grandson, Andrew. They will help the reader visualize the fact
that > > the "curious practice of mixing real names with fictitious names"
is > > not unique to Oregon. As nearly as I can determine, it is
practiced by > > preparers of birth certificates in all states. And it has been
going > > on for at least 16 years - nationwide. Knowing that, you will also > > realize that the source of the command for such a "curious
practice" > > is at the national, or even the international, level. The practice
is > > systemic. [Editor; You can receive copies of the birth
certificates > > from author James Hazel.] > > One other thing that is not made perfectly clear in the following > > letter is the fact that the "names" of "artificial persons," such
as > > corporations and "assumed business names," are written in all > > UPPERCASE letters. Since they are fictional or fictitious
"things," > > they require fictitious names. Don't confuse a fictitious name
with an > > alias (alias dictus). > > "Alias" is when one is known by two or more different names. The
term > > refers only to natural persons, not to artificial "persons." A
natural > > person may be known by as many names as he chooses, for any lawful > > reason - or for no reason. For example: so long as he doesn't use > > different names with the intention to commit fraud, "James Smith"
may > > lawfully also be known as "John Jones." An alias, being a name of
a > > natural person, is always capitalized. > > To the contrary, "a fictitious name is a counterfeit, feigned or > > pretended name taken by a person, differing in some particular
from > > his true name, with the implication that it is meant to deceive
and > > mislead" (Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition). > > A fictitious name may be assumed by a natural person. But the
"name" > > of an artificial "person" is ALWAYS a fictitious name, and every > > attorney will acknowledge that the names of artificial "persons"
are > > always fictitious names. > > Real names are always capitalized, that is, the first letter of
the > > name is capitalized, and the subsequent letters are written in > > lowercase. Fictitious names are generally written in all uppercase > > letters, so they can be distinguished from real names. It's common
for > > typists to improperly write fictitious names in the same "style"
as > > real names. Sometimes the error is driven by the writer's
ignorance, > > but often it is motivated by an intent to deceive. > > The real name of our friend, John Smith is written (you guessed
it!) > > "John Smith." "JOHN SMITH" on the other hand, is a fictitious name
by > > virtue of the fact that it doesn't conform to the rule of grammar > > which requires capitalization of names. Except for absence of > > capitalization, it is spelled like our friend's name, and it
sounds > > the same when spoken orally. But it's not the name for John Smith.
The > > "name" is fictitious in and of itself, since it is not a real
name. > > If John Smith were to examine the driver license in his wallet,
and > > the Social Security card he holds, his old military I.D., and
every > > card, check and statement related to his banking, he would
discover > > that none of them are in his name. They all concern fictitious
names! > > If that doesn't alarm John - wait until he learns that his
children > > and grandchildren: those natural, beautiful flesh, blood and
spirit > > fruits of his loins - bear fictitious names of THINGS; or
"artificial > > persons!" > > James Hazel > > P.O. Box 863 > > Mount Angel OR 97362 > > December 11, 1995 > > Edward Johnson II, > > State Registrar of Vital Statistics > > P.O. Box 14050 > > Portland OR 97214-0050 > > Re: Forms for entries of names on birth certificates: REQUEST FOR
COPY > > OF DIRECTIVE > > Dear Registrar Johnson: > > > > It recently came to my attention, while examining the birth > > certificate issued pursuant to the birth of my grandson (copy
enclosed > > for your reference) that the data entered in the box reserved for > > "CHILD-NAME" is inconsistent. The "First and Middle" given,
Christian > > names are properly capitalized in conformance with the rule of
English > > grammar which governs the writing of names; i.e. "Names are always > > capitalized." But under the section reserved for the "Last" name, > > "HAZEL," in all uppercase letters, is entered. > > Obviously, "HAZEL" is not a name. > > Names for natural persons are, of course, always capitalized; that
is, > > the initial letter of the word/name stands distinctly higher than
the > > subsequent letters. Typically, when expressed in type, the initial > > letter is taken from the uppercase and the subsequent letters are > > taken from the lowercase. The result is that there can be no
ambiguity > > or confusion as to whether a word is a name/proper noun or a
common > > word or common noun. > > Artificial persons (which are actually contrived things that are > > endowed with a few of the legal powers and privileges of natural > > persons) are given fictitious names. It is fitting and appropriate > > that fictitious "persons," as legal fictions, should be given > > fictitious names to distinguish them from other fictional
entities, > > and from natural persons. > > A person may apply to the CORPORATION DIVISION of the office of
the > > SECRETARY OF STATE, for the establishment and registration of an > > ASSUMED BUSINESS NAME. The purpose of such a name is, of course,
to > > enter into activity for the intention of making a profit. The
"name" > > that is then established and registered is a fictitious name; not
a > > real name. > > Since it does not conform with the rule of grammar which requires > > capitalization of names of persons, places and things, "HAZEL," as
it > > appears on the birth certificate discussed herein - obviously
intended > > to be assumed and taken as a family surname - is a fictitious
name. > > Where the fictitious name (HAZEL) is entered into a box reserved
for > > "CHILD-NAME," and mixed together in that box with the > > correctly-written given, Christian names for the child, the data
in > > that box is inconsistent . > > It would seem to logically follow that, where one-third of the
"names" > > in a "name context" or box is fictitious, all of the "names,"
taken > > together, are fictitious - sort of by the same principle that "one > > rotten apple will spoil the barrel" or "guilt by association." > > My concern is that, by some legal mechanism unknown to us, which
has > > been executed against our interests without full disclosure to us,
and > > without our knowledge and express or affirmative consent, we may
have > > been converted into things, possibly to be used as merchandise for
the > > profit or benefit of an unknown (to us) owner. If that is the
case, it > > had to happen through our unknowing tacit consent. We would
certainly > > never consider entering into such an arrangement voluntarily > > I have examined birth certificates issued over the past 15 years
in > > other state jurisdictions, and have found the form of entry of
"names" > > to be identical with that used on the birth certificate herein
under > > discussion. > > I have talked with county registrars, who have advised me that
they > > are required to use that form of entry under direction of the
State > > Registrar. But none could or would provide me with a copy of such
a > > directive. They referred me to your office for a copy of the > > directive. > > Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 333-11-016(2)(h) provides that: > > Unless otherwise directed by the state Registrar, no certificate
shall > > be complete and correct and acceptable for registration: that
contains > > improper or inconsistent data; - > > The Rule clearly provides that birth certificates may contain > > inconsistent data, such as inconsistent mixing of names with > > fictitious names, but only WHEN DIRECTED BY THE STATE REGISTRAR. > > Please provide me with a copy of your directive authorizing the
mixing > > of name-forms on birth certificates. If no such directive has
issued > > from your office, please provide me with the application for > > correcting of false information which appears on a birth
certificate. > > Yours Truly, > > James Hazel > > Concluding Remarks > > In his Revelation, Saint John labored to describe a Beast which > > enslaved Men, and devoured their souls. He exposed the nature and > > mentality of the Beast's servants and supporters, of those who -
like > > attorneys - spoke for the Beast; and those who executed its
commands, > > and those lukewarm quislings who gave it their moral support -
even at > > the cost of their children's lives. But Saint John wrote in highly > > symbolic terms - farfetched from the normal experiences of men.
His > > intent may have been to save individuals from their baser
instincts, > > and raise them to higher levels of consciousness - or to do the
same > > for humanity as a whole... OR BOTH. The result was a Book, which > > however influential and powerful, is esoteric. His general
revelations > > are profound, but lack the concrete details we need to understand
the > > schemes the Beast's servants use to manipulate and exploit
innocent > > men, women and children, to understand sufficiently that we will
be > > able to defend ourselves against the schemes. > > The foregoing Letter to the Registrar is an attempt to layer some > > visible flesh onto the Saint John's etheric skeleton. > > In his 13th Chapter, Saint John warned his posterity that another > > beast would ascend which would execute or nail down the supremacy
of > > the original Beast which, for lack of an effective scheme, had so
far > > been unable to convert all Men into virtually inanimate things, a > > conversion necessary to directly treat them as merchandise to be > > milked and traded in a commercial monopoly. > > Saint John predicted that the latter, irresistible scheme would > > persuade all Men to believe (worship) the idea that their very
lives > > depended on their ability to buy and sell; to get a piece of the > > action of the only game in town! They might sense that the deck
was > > stacked, but the deceptive tricks of the magicians who dealt their > > hands - being consummate lawyers and symbolaeographers, and
dedicated > > servants of the Beast - were almost impossible to catch. John
revealed > > the governing "trick" - in general terms: In order to buy and sell > > (and therefore not be killed by poverty), all men must agree to do
one > > of two things. They must not object to being marked or branded as
the > > Beast is marked. The Beast, being fictitious and having no real > > existence in nature or reality - but existing only in the minds of > > gullible men - is marked or branded by Nature Itself to be a > > fictitious thing. Begin a fictitious thing, the beast is marked
with a > > pretend name... a mark that looks like a name, but really isn't. > > No beast can speak for itself, but only through lawyers and
agents. > > The lawyers who administered the schemes of the second Beast, > > established the "law" which mandates that no natural person may
buy or > > sell, or otherwise seek a profit, in his own Name. They define
such > > activities as business; "Activity entered into with the intent of > > making a profit" - and require such persons to assume fictitious
names > > for purposes related to business. IT IS THE FICTION which is the
mark > > or brand Saint John warns against! It is the same NUMBER (measure)
of > > what the Beast is; the precise level at which it resides in
reality; > > it's status in relationship to every thing else - which is
FICTIONAL. > > And in accordance with the Rule of English Grammar it is marked or > > represented, not by a capitalized name, but by a fictitious
"name." > > Otherwise "natural persons" who wish to participate in the > > Beast-System (a worldwide commercial monopoly), and to buy the
labor > > and souls of other men, while selling their own to the highest
bidder > > must receive from the Beast (System), the privilege of using > > fictitious names. > > Only the managers of the scheme are required to know how the
system > > functions. It is they who dictate the policies that keep it
running > > smoothly; who provide for necessary adjustments and refinements to > > make the system ever more irresistible. Who determine among
themselves > > what the short-term and long-term objectives will be. > > It is also incumbent on the pivotal lawyers - especially judges -
to > > learn the deceptive principles which drive the system - so they
will > > be able to suppress valid challenges to its supremacy. > > But it is requisite that members of the common herd be imprisoned
in > > abject ignorance, never doubting that they are "free and > > self-sovereign individuals" who are in full control of their lives
and > > families, and who can speak freely on any subject they choose, and > > worship whatever God their consciences dictate. > > And it is especially essential that the soldiers
(policy-enforcement > > officers), who are required to suppress human activities which
tend to > > undermine the monopoly business venture, be drawn from the least > > imaginative and sensitive humans. While they are chosen for their
love > > of violence, and must exhibit physical bravery - only intellectual
and > > spiritual cowards are eligible to become military, executorial, > > persons. > > The "Latter Beast" appeared in embryonic form barely 100 years
ago. > > Since its advent, it has matured into the monolithic form we "see" > > today. Despite dire predictions of "an impending collapse of
society > > as we know it today," the Beast (System) will not implode into
itself. > > It will not self-destruct. It will continue on its course; growing > > ever po