PDA

View Full Version : Wells Fargo suspending access to deposits


JoblessDave
11-13-2005, 06:54 PM
Have any of you seen this? I filed a chapter 7 for a client with about
$14,000 in her account, which was scheduled and exempted, but they locked
the client out of her account until the chapter 7 trustee advised them of
his intention regarding the funds. The trustee is going to abandon the
funds, but it's taken over 30 days to get this resolved, during which time
the debtor hasn't had access to her money. I wish I'd heard of this before.

Brett Weiss
11-14-2005, 05:10 PM
Wells Fargo is doing this nationally. It is, IMO, borderline permissible.
Wells Fargo is attempting to avoid a claim by the Trustee that it improperly
and prematurely released funds that might be the property of the bankruptcy
estate.

In 99.9% of cases, they aren't, but that never prevented someone from
guarding against that .1% possibility.

Brett Weiss
lawyer@brettweiss.com
www.brettweiss.com

Maryland, DC and Federal bars
Member, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys

--> Read our Bankruptcy FAQ at www.brettweiss.com/faq/br_faq.htm

Justice consists not in being neutral between right and wrong, but in
finding out the right and upholding it, wherever found, against the
wrong. —Theodore Roosevelt

Required disclosure and notice: We are a federally-designated debt relief
agent, proudly helping people file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code
since 1983. Pursuant to 11 USC § 342 and 527, we are required to provide
certain notices, which may be found at www.brettweiss.com/faq/br_faq.htm.

************************************************** ***************
The Small Print: This response is for discussion purposes only.
It isn't meant to be legal advice and you shouldn't treat it as
such. If you want legal advice, speak with a local lawyer
familiar with your state's laws who can review *all* of the
facts and the law applicable to your situation.
************************************************** ***************

"JoblessDave" <JoblessDave@notlisted.us> wrote in message
news:1%Sdf.39$Xd6.30@fed1read06... Have any of you seen this? I filed a chapter 7 for a client with about $14,000 in her account, which was scheduled and exempted, but they locked the client out of her account until the chapter 7 trustee advised them of his intention regarding the funds. The trustee is going to abandon the funds, but it's taken over 30 days to get this resolved, during which time the debtor hasn't had access to her money. I wish I'd heard of this before.

JoblessDave
11-15-2005, 08:40 AM
"Brett Weiss" <lawyer@brettweiss.com> wrote in message
news:_sqdnURTK5MwqOTeRVn-vg@giganews.com... Wells Fargo is doing this nationally. It is, IMO, borderline permissible. Wells Fargo is attempting to avoid a claim by the Trustee that it improperly and prematurely released funds that might be the property of the bankruptcy estate.

Wells Fargo's letter states that they are "required by Sections 541 and 542
of the Bankruptcy Code to act in good faith to preserve the status quo and
so must follow the trustee's direction with regard to the Estate Funds."
But section 542 provides that an entity, other than a custoidan, in
possession of property that the debtor may exempt, *shall deliver* to the
trustee, and account for, such property.

When I wrote my post the Trustee had promised me an abandonment. That was
days ago, and I still haven't seen it filed. I know I'll have a remedy 30
days after the conclusion of the meeting of creditors, but I don't see a way
to expidite the Trustee's action. I wonder how Wells Fargo or the Trustee
would respond to a demand that funds be *delivered* to the trustee?

Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements