PDA

View Full Version : Just for the record


Robibnikoff
11-02-2003, 05:51 AM
In article <20031102032236.05551.00000104@mb-m26.aol.com>, LilMtnCbn says...
snip
Yeah, sure, big revelation. We've all respected, acknowleged, commiseratedwith Robyn's frustration with her reunion/non-reunion. Except for Jackie, who"blaimed" it on Robyn's attitude and hounded Robyn as her new chew toy untilRobyn actually turned the tables. Then Jackie was "offended" and stoppedresponding.Now that you're here, a couple of years after all this was posted...gotanything new to add? We've been there and done that.

Indeed - I sure has hell had no desire to dredge up a conversation that occurred
two years ago. A heck of a lot has gone on since.

Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557

GR
11-02-2003, 02:22 PM
On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 13:51:49 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:

<snip>
Indeed - I sure has hell had no desire to dredge up a conversation that occurredtwo years ago. A heck of a lot has gone on since.

I think that there are things going on now and they are worth looking
at and discussing. You're under no obligation to do so with me or
anyone else, of course.

GR

Robibnikoff
11-02-2003, 04:39 PM
In article <r81bqv0o29b6buh40eg4992qsbuqjq2o8g@4ax.com>, GR says...On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 13:51:49 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>wrote:<snip>Indeed - I sure has hell had no desire to dredge up a conversation that occurredtwo years ago. A heck of a lot has gone on since.I think that there are things going on now and they are worth lookingat and discussing. You're under no obligation to do so with me oranyone else, of course.

Believe me, I really appreciate fresh insight into the situation; however, I
just don't want to rehash the thing with Jackie again. We went down that road
two years ago and there's no reason to do it again.

Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557

Jackie
11-03-2003, 05:44 AM
On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 22:22:43 GMT, GR <gragain@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 13:51:49 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>wrote:<snip>Indeed - I sure has hell had no desire to dredge up a conversation that occurredtwo years ago. A heck of a lot has gone on since.I think that there are things going on now and they are worth lookingat and discussing. You're under no obligation to do so with me oranyone else, of course.


Just for the record I did not dredge that conversation up..

Jeanette brought the post forward..

Jackie

Robibnikoff
11-03-2003, 06:34 AM
In article <8smcqvg92d97u2l90oclgb556tssfv0bpn@4ax.com>, Jackie says...On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 22:22:43 GMT, GR <gragain@earthlink.net> wrote:On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 13:51:49 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>wrote:<snip>Indeed - I sure has hell had no desire to dredge up a conversation that occurredtwo years ago. A heck of a lot has gone on since.I think that there are things going on now and they are worth lookingat and discussing. You're under no obligation to do so with me oranyone else, of course.Just for the record I did not dredge that conversation up..Jeanette brought the post forward..

Maybe you didn't dredge up the original comment, but you sure dived into a
two-year-old conversation with gusto.

Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557

Jackie
11-04-2003, 05:39 AM
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:34:08 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:
Just for the record I did not dredge that conversation up..Jeanette brought the post forward..Maybe you didn't dredge up the original comment, but you sure dived into atwo-year-old conversation with gusto.

Oh I'm sorry... I was not aware that I was not allowed to question
what some people post here..

I guess I am supposed to just sit and be a yard***** and do your
bidding..


Jackie

Robibnikoff
11-04-2003, 06:14 AM
In article <2uafqv46f521gv6p3fj0hl186jk468d3n5@4ax.com>, Jackie says...On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:34:08 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>wrote:Just for the record I did not dredge that conversation up..Jeanette brought the post forward..Maybe you didn't dredge up the original comment, but you sure dived into atwo-year-old conversation with gusto.Oh I'm sorry... I was not aware that I was not allowed to questionwhat some people post here..

Did I say that? No, I didn't.I guess I am supposed to just sit and be a yard***** and do yourbidding..

YOUR words, Jackie - Not mine.

Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557

kat
11-05-2003, 07:09 PM
"Robibnikoff" <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in message
news:rvOpb.26474$cJ5.4270@www.newsranger.com... In article <2uafqv46f521gv6p3fj0hl186jk468d3n5@4ax.com>, Jackie says...On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:34:08 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>wrote:>Just for the record I did not dredge that conversation up..>>Jeanette brought the post forward..Maybe you didn't dredge up the original comment, but you sure dived into
atwo-year-old conversation with gusto.Oh I'm sorry... I was not aware that I was not allowed to questionwhat some people post here.. Did I say that? No, I didn't.I guess I am supposed to just sit and be a yard***** and do yourbidding.. YOUR words, Jackie - Not mine.

As always, as always. . . . .


Kathy 1

Complete Labor Law Poster for $24.95
from www.LaborLawCenter.com, includes
State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements