Nightauel
02-23-2006, 02:28 PM
I'm in South Carolina. I work for a company who is using the fluctuating work week method of calculation for overtime payment. They are currently involved in a number of class actions regarding their method of calculating the half time rate, but I'm confused over the legality of the fluctuating work week.
I thought it was intended as a method of making overtime calculations simpler for employees who worked less than forty hours one week and more than forty the next. In my company's case, it is being used strictly as a way to avoid paying proper overtime.
If it was the intent of FSLA to assure that worker bees were paid time and a half for work over forty hours in a week, then scheduling "salaried plus overtime" employees for forty eight plus hours EVERY SINGLE WEEK doesn't seem to fit the spirit of the law.
Can someone explain to me the criteria used to determine who may use this method? Are there no limitations? Are there circumstances under which the Federal government can say "No, you can't do that"?
I've seen several references in some of these class actions where this company is accused of not including some parts of an employee's income when determing the "half time" part of the salary. I've seen bonuses specifically mentioned. What about commissions? And how can those parts of an annual gross be calculated prior to those amounts being paid?
Nightauel
I thought it was intended as a method of making overtime calculations simpler for employees who worked less than forty hours one week and more than forty the next. In my company's case, it is being used strictly as a way to avoid paying proper overtime.
If it was the intent of FSLA to assure that worker bees were paid time and a half for work over forty hours in a week, then scheduling "salaried plus overtime" employees for forty eight plus hours EVERY SINGLE WEEK doesn't seem to fit the spirit of the law.
Can someone explain to me the criteria used to determine who may use this method? Are there no limitations? Are there circumstances under which the Federal government can say "No, you can't do that"?
I've seen several references in some of these class actions where this company is accused of not including some parts of an employee's income when determing the "half time" part of the salary. I've seen bonuses specifically mentioned. What about commissions? And how can those parts of an annual gross be calculated prior to those amounts being paid?
Nightauel
